GameBreaker wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Demar Derozan - most disrespected player
Collapse
X
-
-
OldSkoolCool wrote: View PostWhat I argue is that it isn't a crap shoot. In fact, my argument stats that GOOD TALENT is found at HIGH PICKS. No crap shoot.
Actually from the years I went through the max number of all-stars after 10 was 2....and they were closer to ten than thirty. It still requires a high pick in the draft. Period.
I think that a very good, professional scouting team should be able to pick those players out from the rest of the class, or at least narrow the options down. So I would say the 3/80 stat isn't a set of identical, independent events, but rather a heterogeneous set of picks.
In other words, some picks are good, and some picks are bad, and regardless how they turn out, those good picks will have a different chance of turning into all stars than the bad ones.
Your point is taken that good players are found at the top of the draft, I understand this and it should be self explanatory. I also think that those 'numbers' are not really representative of the true odds of getting an all star player after the 10th pick.
I was more bringing up a technical nit-pick. Your point is valid and taken, I just wanted to comment on the use of those types of stats, which I've seen used on the front page as well.Last edited by stooley; Mon Jan 27, 2014, 10:57 AM."Bruno?
Heh, if he is in the D-league still in a few years I will be surprised.
He's terrible."
-Superjudge, 7/23
Hope you're wrong.
Comment
Comment