Miekenstien wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is There A Scenario -- Loul Deng edition
Collapse
X
-
-
TRex wrote: View PostMeh. Some posters in this forum just don't like DeRozan.
Trading DeRozan straight up for Deng is just flat out STUPID. It's laughable. It's not even worth a debate.
Comment
-
Man DeRozan is really disliked around here...
Trade DeRozan for 15th pick and bad contracts.
Trade DeRozan for Dion Waiters and his 50% TS
Trade DeRozan for Deng (30 next season) who will cost 8 figures a season to re-sign
Thank God some of you aren't the GM of this team. Cleveland would laugh all the way to the bank if we offered them DeRozan for Deng. For all the complaining that people do about DeRozan's inefficiency. He's actually more efficient than Deng (53.0% TS compared to 51.7%) at much higher volume (18FGA to 14FGA and 23ppg compared to 15ppg). Not to mention DD is 5 years younger and on a cheaper deal than what it'll cost to sign Deng.
It's not just this season either, Deng has never been particularly efficient, despite the fact that he's been in a role player role his whole career. Has a career TS% of 52.6% (which coincidentally is the same as DeRozan's). It should be pretty telling that the Bulls actually got better when he was traded. Unlike DeRozan, he doesn't draw double teams and opposing defences don't game plan for him, so he doesn't really benefit the team offensively. He also isn't a good passer at all.
So... on topic --- no I wouldn't trade DeRozan for Deng, nor would I sign Deng even if we had the cap space. The only high-price wing player (obviously LBJ and Melo are not happening) I'd even dare to spend money on this offseason is Gordon Hayward. Might be able to get a bargain on him due to him having a down shooting season, and I'd expect his efficiency to ratchet back up as the 3rd or 4th option on our team as opposed to 1st in Utah.Last edited by imanshumpert; Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:41 AM.
Comment
-
FoxMachine wrote: View Postcap numbers are also not my forte but just throwing it out there that id give up derozan for deng in a heartbeat... too bad cavs have no use for himFoxMachine wrote: View Posti don't care that the trade is stupid or laughable... im not even arguing that we do that trade... all im saying is if deng played the 3 position on this team and ross played the 2 instead of derozan, i think we'd be a much better team on offense and defense lol... i really don't even get how anyone can argue against that. At this point in deng's career it doesn't really make sense and we still would not be championship contenders but the point is id love it if we had a different skill set at the 2. We cant live and die by Derozan's long 2 and pylon defense.
http://www.raptorsrepublic.com/2014/...proved-player/
and this article that was on our front page explains well what demar brings to this team.
Comment
-
Miekenstien wrote: View Postkind of looks like you're saying that exact same thing. even if it isn't by trading
http://www.raptorsrepublic.com/2014/...proved-player/
and this article that was on our front page explains well what demar brings to this team.
Comment
-
imanshumpert wrote: View PostMan DeRozan is really disliked around here...
Trade DeRozan for 15th pick and bad contracts.
Trade DeRozan for Dion Waiters and his 50% TS
Trade DeRozan for Deng (30 next season) who will cost 8 figures a season to re-sign
Thank God some of you aren't the GM of this team. Cleveland would laugh all the way to the bank if we offered them DeRozan for Deng. For all the complaining that people do about DeRozan's inefficiency. He's actually more efficient than Deng (53.0% TS compared to 51.7%) at much higher volume (18FGA to 14FGA and 23ppg compared to 15ppg). Not to mention DD is 5 years younger and on a cheaper deal than what it'll cost to sign Deng.
It's not just this season either, Deng has never been particularly efficient, despite the fact that he's been in a role player role his whole career. Has a career TS% of 52.6% (which coincidentally is the same as DeRozan's). It should be pretty telling that the Bulls actually got better when he was traded. Unlike DeRozan, he doesn't draw double teams and opposing defences don't game plan for him, so he doesn't really benefit the team offensively. He also isn't a good passer at all.
So... on topic --- no I wouldn't trade DeRozan for Deng, nor would I sign Deng even if we had the cap space. The only high-price wing player (obviously LBJ and Melo are not happening) I'd even dare to spend money on this offseason is Gordon Hayward. Might be able to get a bargain on him due to him having a down shooting season, and I'd expect his efficiency to ratchet back up as the 3rd or 4th option on our team as opposed to 1st in Utah.
Only thing I disagree with is signing Hayward. Raps need to use an exception or sign and trade.... Unless you want to renounce Lowry and lose for nothing.
Comment
-
http://www.raptorsrepublic.com/forum...014+free+agent
Based on suggestions in this thread, the link to former thread is appropriate. Money shot:
So what are you willing to sacrifice from this current team to get a $10+M per year player?
..... core guys?
..... depth?
..... draft picks?
..... any combination of the above?
Comment
-
imanshumpert wrote: View Post
Trade DeRozan for 15th pick and bad contracts.
Trade DeRozan for Dion Waiters and his 50% TS
Trade DeRozan for Deng (30 next season) who will cost 8 figures a season to re-sign
And as for Deng I never saw what the fuss was about. He's aging, played a ton of minutes. Chicago has improved with him gone. Pair him with DeRozan and offensively the shooting will be awful, pair him with Ross and the defense would be great but I don't think Ross will be ready to be a guy who has a huge increase in usage.
Ideally it would be nice to have a big small forward to defend those few monsters out there, but I think Derozan and Ross complement each other really well and perhaps the best bet would be to get a back up small forward with size to play in those few situations where it's vital. Unless of course it's for some real game changer, but Deng...nope.
Comment
-
Anyone who would take Deng over Derozan is absolutely delusional.
Deng now is not the Deng of four years ago. His last three seasons he has had a TS% lower than Demar this year, so complaining about Demar's efficiency is preposterous.
Deng has been ground down under Thibs and has played something like 14000 more minutes than Demar.
Demar's defense is vastly improved (check his PPP). I don't know what more people could ask for from a sub-$10mm all-star.
We need more star power, not a creaky fix like Deng. Deng is a BC-type patchwork addition. Better off keeping our powder dry for a better opportunity.
Comment
-
Scraptor wrote: View PostAnyone who would take Deng over Derozan is absolutely delusional.
Deng now is not the Deng of four years ago. His last three seasons he has had a TS% lower than Demar this year, so complaining about Demar's efficiency is preposterous.
Deng has been ground down under Thibs and has played something like 14000 more minutes than Demar.
Demar's defense is vastly improved (check his PPP). I don't know what more people could ask for from a sub-$10mm all-star.
We need more star power, not a creaky fix like Deng. Deng is a BC-type patchwork addition. Better off keeping our powder dry for a better opportunity.
Not. Even. Close.
The stat geeks have always been against Luol, too.
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostSolid points in here.
Only thing I disagree with is signing Hayward. Raps need to use an exception or sign and trade.... Unless you want to renounce Lowry and lose for nothing.
That being said I probably wouldn't sign Hayward anyway. It doesn't put us over the top (a wing rotation of Hayward, DD, Ross would make us better but not a title contender).
I think honestly we just need to keep stockpiling desirable assets. The only way we're going to ascend from 1st/2nd round fodder to title contention at this point is by acquiring a superstar player; whether that's via trade or free agency. Let's make sure we have a ton of picks, desirable players and prospects so that if the opportunity ever arises to acquire a star we can pounce (see Brooklyn with DWill, Houston with Harden, etc).Last edited by imanshumpert; Wed Apr 16, 2014, 12:42 PM.
Comment
-
Scraptor wrote: View PostAnyone who would take Deng over Derozan is absolutely delusional.
Deng now is not the Deng of four years ago. His last three seasons he has had a TS% lower than Demar this year, so complaining about Demar's efficiency is preposterous.
Deng has been ground down under Thibs and has played something like 14000 more minutes than Demar.
Demar's defense is vastly improved (check his PPP). I don't know what more people could ask for from a sub-$10mm all-star.
We need more star power, not a creaky fix like Deng. Deng is a BC-type patchwork addition. Better off keeping our powder dry for a better opportunity.
However, I do agree that we do not need a quick fix. But when the time comes to go all in, I do not expect demar to be here.
Comment
-
FoxMachine wrote: View Posti don't care that the trade is stupid or laughable... im not even arguing that we do that trade... all im saying is if deng played the 3 position on this team and ross played the 2 instead of derozan, i think we'd be a much better team on offense and defense lol... i really don't even get how anyone can argue against that. At this point in deng's career it doesn't really make sense and we still would not be championship contenders but the point is id love it if we had a different skill set at the 2. We cant live and die by Derozan's long 2 and pylon defense.
First of all DeRozan is a better offensive player than Luol Deng, period. There is no argument to be had here. DeRozan has a higher assist rate, lower turnover rate, and scores more efficiently with significantly higher volume. Not to mention he's much more versatile as a scorer than Deng is. Deng is mostly a catch and shoot player/a finisher, he doesn't create a lot of shots. DeRozan on the other hand has the ability to get to the rim and finish, score out of the high or low post, and is the 2nd most efficient pick and roll ball handler (PPP) in the league after Goran Dragic. Those pick and rolls/pops help create a ton of points for guys like Amir and 2Pat, and additionally can shift the defense to help free guys like Ross/Vasquez/Lowry for open 3s. So no, our offense would NOT get better if we traded DeRozan for Deng, it would get significantly worse. That's another guy standing around waiting for somebody to create an open look for him, and that would place the onus on Lowry to create scoring opportunities for the other 4 players on the floor at all times. He's not LeBron or CP3.
Additionally there is no reason whatsoever to double Luol Deng, while opposing coaches double DeRozan on a regular basis. I'm sure you can do math, so it should be easy to see how if DD gets doubled there are now only 3 defenders available to guard the other 4 Raptors players. This makes it easier to score and create offense.
As for the defensive end, I think Deng would only make our defense better against Miami (since we have no one that can guard LBJ one on one really). I actually don't think he would improve our team defensively much overall if at all.
While DeRozan is obviously not a shut-down defender, he doesn't need to be. Ross always guards the superior offensive wing on the other team, and most teams don't have 2 wings that are lethal scoring threats (the only one I can think of is Miami, maybe Brooklyn but PP and JJ are old now). As a result, DD is usually left guarding a role player. As you saw in that link that Miekenstein posted, that is actually why DeRozan is the best isolation defender in the league according to Synergy statistics. Swapping Deng for DeRozan to guard the Kyle Korvers, Mike Dunleavys, Trevor Arizas, MKGs and Iman Shumperts of the world isn't going to do a hell of a lot for us defensively. Even though Deng is a better perimeter defender, the marginal improvement that we'd get defending role players isn't worth what we're losing on the offensive end.
Comment
-
FoxMachine wrote: View Postno stat can excuse how terrible demar is on defense. some games it feels like he is the cause of every basket against us. The guy sends rotations out of whack constantly and cant guard anyone. just watch the game, its obvious.
However, I do agree that we do not need a quick fix. But when the time comes to go all in, I do not expect demar to be here.
Comment
Comment