Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Early Projection of 2015-16 Season

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Early Projection of 2015-16 Season

    Hi all,

    With most of the big moves of free agency having settled down, and even a lot of role players off the market with a few notable exceptions, I thought I'd take a look at how the season projects out.

    I'm using RPM here, ESPN's player impact statistic, and then using net points as a predictor for winning percentage using Pythagorean wins.

    Quick walk through: first, I took the RPM value of every player in the league from last season. Didn't adjust them in any way, didn't project improvement or decay. Just last year's value.

    Then I placed all the players on their current teams based on the off-season so far, and all the rumours I could track. Any players still unsigned I've left off completely for now. Most of them are either low impact or low minutes players so they shouldn't skew this too much.

    I made no adjustments to minutes, or guesses on how playing time will change. I simply listed the players and their MPG from last season for each team. I tried using total minutes, but it became too difficult to adjust for players who missed large chunks of last season. By using MPG that fixes most of those issues (though not all, I'll touch on this later).

    Then, having compiled all the players, their RPM and their minutes based entirely on last season, I created a MPG-weighted average RPM for every player on every team. This creates an automatic adjustment - I'm not taking an approach like WS and simply summing the WS of new players, as if their minutes need to be adjusted those numbers will obviously change. This approach simply assumes that if a team, based on their total MPG from last season, has too few minutes to go around, every player will have their minutes adjusted downwards proportionally. Probably not true, but there aren't any instances where this effect is extreme, so I think this is a reasonable approach.

    This yields, for each team, an average RPM (I actually did dRPM and oRPM separately just for additional information). Those RPM values are then multiplied by 5 (as at any time, a team will effectively have 5 of their average player on the floor impacting the game). That value is added (or subtracted, for dRPM) from the league average ORTG last year (103) to give a predicted ORTG and DRTG for the team.

    Then using the Pythagorean approach, win percentage is calculated (I used a power of 14.5, though 16 has been used as well). Multiply by 82 and you've got your number of wins.

    Here is what the Raptors looked like, for example.

    Player..................Team | MPG | ORPM | DRPM | O-impact | D-impact
    DeMarre Carroll......TOR.....31.3......0.96 -0.25.........30.05 -7.83
    Bismack Biyombo....TOR.....19.4.....-2.58 1.59........-50.05 30.85
    Luis Scola.............TOR.....20.5.....-0.32 0.87..........-6.56 17.84
    Cory Joseph..........TOR.....18.3......0.04 0.96............0.73 17.57
    Kyle Lowry............TOR.....34.5......2.55 1.27..........87.98 43.82
    James Johnson.......TOR.....19.6......0.33 1.66...........6.47 32.54
    Patrick Patterson...TOR.....26.6......2.16 -1.82.........57.46 -48.41
    DeMar DeRozan......TOR.....35.0......0.21 -0.36..........7.35 -12.60
    Jonas Valanciunas...TOR.....26.2.....-1.72 1.05........-45.06 27.51
    Terrence Ross........TOR.....25.5......1.75 -3.77........44.63 -96.14
    Lucas Nogueira.......TOR.....3.8......-0.92 -0.34........-3.50 -1.29
    Bruno Caboclo........TOR.....2.9......-1.43 -1.63........-4.15 -4.73

    Total............................263.6............ ...............125.335 -0.881
    Per player average RPM................0.475 -0.003
    Net impact per 5 players...............2.377 -0.017
    ORTG and DRTG..........................105.4 103.0
    Win % 58%
    Wins 47.7

    (Sorry about the formatting there just can't get the table embedding to work).

    So, I did that for every team. And ended up with these rankings.

    Place |East |ORTG |DRTG |Wins
    1 ATL 106.4 98.9 60.8
    2 CLE 107.7 101.6 57.5
    3 CHI 104.8 101.5 50.3
    4 TOR 105.4 103.0 47.7
    5 WAS 101.1 99.6 45.4
    6 BOS 104.1 102.7 45.2
    7 IND 103.2 104.0 38.7
    8 MIA 103.6 105.3 36.2
    9 DET 103.7 106.5 33.4
    10 CHA 100.0 102.6 33.4
    11 MIL 97.7 102.2 28.0
    12 ORL 100.5 107.0 23.6
    13 BKN 99.3 107.2 20.2
    14 NY 100.2 109.9 16.9
    15 PHI 94.6 106.6 12.3

    Pos West ORTG DRTG Wins
    1 GS 108.9 97.4 68.5
    2 SA 108.1 97.8 66.5
    3 DAL 109.4 103.4 56.8
    4 MEM 105.1 101.0 52.4
    5 OKC 106.9 102.8 52.2
    6 LAC 107.7 103.6 52.2
    7 NO 106.5 103.6 49.2
    8 HOU 104.0 101.2 48.9
    9 SAC 103.8 102.0 46.4
    10 PHX 98.6 98.1 42.5
    11 UTA 101.7 102.4 39.0
    12 POR 101.1 101.9 38.6
    13 DEN 101.6 108.0 24.1
    14 LAL 100.9 110.4 17.5
    15 MIN 98.6 108.2 16.9

    Those results seem reasonable to me.

    Some corrections I thought to make (they are not implemented above, that's the raw data there). Paul George returning to Indy using his RPM and MPG from 2013-14 would mean a jump of 7 wins, up to 5th right behind TOR. Chris Bosh returning to his 2013-14 RPM and MPG would mean a 3 win jump for MIA, which doesn't move them up the standings unless you don't do the Paul George adjustment. Kevin Durant doing the same would add 4 wins to OKC's total, moving them up one spot ahead of MEM. I didn't adjust for Melo, as he had a reasonable number of games and minutes and had his usual impact last season.

    So, a couple promising things for Raptors fans: first, the Raptors project to have a top 10 offence again. And they project to improve to a league average defence. Hopefully they can make even larger strides based on improved systems, but it is heartening that purely on the strength of the personnel they are looking to make a 6-7 spot jump defensively. And it appears that the prediction of a struggling Raptors offence might be a little premature.

    Another very promising consideration: the Raptors own the less valuable of the Knicks and Nuggets first round picks this coming draft. And this system places those two teams 3rd and 7th in the lottery. A 7th overall pick would be a pretty nice return for Andrea Bargnani.

    I hope you liked this little early projection game. I tried to keep my own assumptions and biases completely out of it. Any questions are very welcome.
    twitter.com/dhackett1565

  • #2
    we should trade DeRozan and fire Casey

    I mean the only team that sticks out to me that may progress well beyond what is show here would be Milwuakee
    For still frame photograph of me reading the DeRozan thread please refer to my avatar

    Comment


    • #3
      Demarre is a negative defensively?

      Comment


      • #4
        thead wrote: View Post
        we should trade DeRozan and fire Casey

        I mean the only team that sticks out to me that may progress well beyond what is show here would be Milwuakee
        I noticed that too, assuming it has to do with Monroe

        Comment


        • #5
          By the way, great work yet again Dan. Appreciate the time spent into doing things like these.

          Comment


          • #6
            http://www.si.com/nba/2015/07/16/nba...zers-mavericks

            After the Raptors were unceremoniously swept out of the playoffs by the Wizards, people around the league questioned whether GM Masai Ujiri would blow up the team during the off-season.

            Instead, he made a series of shrewd moves, making Carroll an offer he couldn’t refuse while reconfiguring the team’s bench. Toronto has not yet won 50 games in a season, but that is now a reasonable expectation for the team to have going into the season.

            One factor that could derail the Raptors? Injuries. Toronto was relatively lucky in that regard last season, as DeMar DeRozan and Kyle Lowry’s combined 32 games missed were really the only injuries of note. If center Jonas Valanciunas (team-leading 8.2 win shares in 2014-15) has to sit for a prolonged amount of time, the Raptors could just as easily tumble into the bottom half of the Eastern Conference playoff picture.
            Only one thing matters: We The Champs.

            Comment


            • #7
              Nice bit of work Dan.

              Fans could argue with this any number of ways. A couple of obvious ones are A) young players are likely to improve, older players are likely to get a little worse, therefore the Raptors (with really no "old" players outside of Scola) will probably improve based on more experience and little age related drop off and B) any rational adjustment to minutes played, based on advanced stats, should help the Raps more than others because Casey's management of player's minutes last season was a net negative (assuming any of the coaching staff picked up on that.

              I like that you didn't do that and simply used the numbers as they were. So there is room here for the eternal optimists as well as the Raptocalypse seers.

              Should be a good thread. (Colour me optimistic).

              Comment


              • #8
                Denver will be dumping Galinari and Chandler probably at some point and Lawson will probably never okay again in Denver.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Bonus Jonas wrote: View Post
                  Demarre is a negative defensively?
                  Yeah, but I think it's because of having Sefolosha come off the bench. He replaced Caroll and is a better defender. I don't know how that reflects in DRPM though.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It looks like you have nothing in the east changing except Brooklyn getting a lot worse.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Puffer wrote: View Post
                      Nice bit of work Dan.

                      Fans could argue with this any number of ways. A couple of obvious ones are A) young players are likely to improve, older players are likely to get a little worse, therefore the Raptors (with really no "old" players outside of Scola) will probably improve based on more experience and little age related drop off and B) any rational adjustment to minutes played, based on advanced stats, should help the Raps more than others because Casey's management of player's minutes last season was a net negative (assuming any of the coaching staff picked up on that.

                      I like that you didn't do that and simply used the numbers as they were. So there is room here for the eternal optimists as well as the Raptocalypse seers.

                      Should be a good thread. (Colour me optimistic).
                      Yeah, I tried to stay as hands off as possible. I find whenever I tweak stuff it can easily skew the results, and I wasn't going to go through every team in the league and tweak stuff, so I thought changing as little as possible by hand was the way to go.
                      twitter.com/dhackett1565

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Bonus Jonas wrote: View Post
                        Demarre is a negative defensively?
                        Well, a very slight one. One thing to keep in mind is that RPM has a slight substitution bias - so if a player is usually subbed for a very good defensive player, their DRPM will be suppressed. I think this is happening here a bit, as Thabo came off the bench for ATL a lot and he's a tremendous (+3) defender. In any case, his upgrade over Ross last year (-0.25 vs -3.77) is massive.
                        twitter.com/dhackett1565

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Bonus Jonas wrote: View Post
                          I noticed that too, assuming it has to do with Monroe
                          No, actually, in spite of my not liking his fit there at all.

                          Has more to do with them trading for MCW - he has been just awful impact wise, and their play fell off a cliff after that trade.
                          twitter.com/dhackett1565

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            raptors999 wrote: View Post
                            Denver will be dumping Galinari and Chandler probably at some point and Lawson will probably never okay again in Denver.
                            I agree. And that gives me hope they end up even lower than the 7th worst I predict here, which would leave that pick looking very, very nice.
                            twitter.com/dhackett1565

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              DanH wrote: View Post
                              I agree. And that gives me hope they end up even lower than the 7th worst I predict here, which would leave that pick looking very, very nice.
                              Denver will finish even lower than the Knicks. They are tanking

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X