DogeLover1234 wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything Jakob Poeltl
Collapse
X
-
I think that there's a chance that Poeltl starts at PF, simply because if Patterson starts, that could mean having both Poeltl and Pascal in the game with the bench unit, and not sure Casey would trust the two of them together defensively, at least at the beginning
Of course, I still expect Masai to fill out the roster a bit before the season
Comment
-
Ebonhawke wrote: View PostI think that there's a chance that Poeltl starts at PF, simply because if Patterson starts, that could mean having both Poeltl and Pascal in the game with the bench unit, and not sure Casey would trust the two of them together defensively, at least at the beginning
Of course, I still expect Masai to fill out the roster a bit before the season
Comment
-
blackjitsu wrote: View PostCan people stop with this idea that Poeltl is a PF? In no way, shape, or form is Jakob a power forward. He is ideally a mobile 5. At PF, his mobility is similar or worse than opposing players. The goal should always be to put players in the situation for them to most likely succeed. That spot or him is at Center.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Puffer wrote: View PostThis year, the weight was down, speed up and there didn't appear to be any significant drop off in strength.
Comment
-
blackjitsu wrote: View PostCan people stop with this idea that Poeltl is a PF? In no way, shape, or form is Jakob a power forward. He is ideally a mobile 5. At PF, his mobility is similar or worse than opposing players. The goal should always be to put players in the situation for them to most likely succeed. That spot or him is at Center.
Comment
-
blackjitsu wrote: View PostCan people stop with this idea that Poeltl is a PF? In no way, shape, or form is Jakob a power forward. He is ideally a mobile 5. At PF, his mobility is similar or worse than opposing players. The goal should always be to put players in the situation for them to most likely succeed. That spot or him is at Center.DanH wrote: View PostAt PF, his mobility is similar to opposing players, while his length, rebounding and post scoring and defence is superior. At C his mobility is superior, while his length, rebounding and post play is less of an advantage. Is it really so clear cut that playing him at C is playing to his strengths?
Comment
-
blackjitsu wrote: View PostCan people stop with this idea that Poeltl is a PF? In no way, shape, or form is Jakob a power forward. He is ideally a mobile 5. At PF, his mobility is similar or worse than opposing players. The goal should always be to put players in the situation for them to most likely succeed. That spot or him is at Center.
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostAt PF, his mobility is similar to opposing players, while his length, rebounding and post scoring and defence is superior. At C his mobility is superior, while his length, rebounding and post play is less of an advantage. Is it really so clear cut that playing him at C is playing to his strengths?@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Miekenstien wrote: View Posta team like ours can push the envelope a bit as well. a team that has to play him would feel more pressure to put him into the 5 position but we can see if he can develop into a 4. if he can, he is a much more valuable player. same reasons i think you try to get murray to play the 1, the nuggets won't but i thought we could have.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Really? The people imagining that Poeltl is a PF, have you watched ANY tape of him playing PF at ANY level? Similar speed? You mean having slightly below average speed at PF vs above average at Center. Wingspan? How many 6-10 forwards have massive wingspans.
He's not an anomaly at PF. He is at C. Always put players in the best situation to succeed. Why is that basic idea escaping people? Am I missing something?
Comment
-
blackjitsu wrote: View PostReally? The people imagining that Poeltl is a PF, have you watched ANY tape of him playing PF at ANY level? Similar speed? You mean having slightly below average speed at PF vs above average at Center. Wingspan? How many 6-10 forwards have massive wingspans.
He's not an anomaly at PF. He is at C. Always put players in the best situation to succeed. Why is that basic idea escaping people? Am I missing something?
Porzingas is a center but played the 4 this year. KATs....
He can guard out on the perimeter.
Not saying he will be a full time 4 or is a better 4 then a 5. I am saying he can switch between the two. I don't think it will kill spacing as it would have playing Biz and JV. Nothing wrong with having two low post guys who can score, rebound, roll and have a soft touch. The kid will be just fine. Casey even said he will play the 4 some.
Comment
-
blackjitsu wrote: View PostReally? The people imagining that Poeltl is a PF, have you watched ANY tape of him playing PF at ANY level? Similar speed? You mean having slightly below average speed at PF vs above average at Center. Wingspan? How many 6-10 forwards have massive wingspans.
He's not an anomaly at PF. He is at C. Always put players in the best situation to succeed. Why is that basic idea escaping people? Am I missing something?
He's very much an anomaly at PF with his low post ability and length/height.
Yes, I watched the game he played PF for the Austrian national team when they played a friendly against JV's Lithuanian squad last summer. That was the game he dropped 27 that Ujiri referenced, and he played more at PF that game than C (guarded often by Sabonis) and he was plenty quick enough in that game, and had a big advantage with his size at the position.
Comment
-
Mess wrote: View PostCan we just put a temporary ban on the PFvC debate until the regular season comes around? Even Summer League won't really be that informative I imagine.
Comment
Comment