I know its early, but here is my question for everyone. Lets say we could have had Paul Millsap for T-Ross+2Pat+2017 first rounder. Would you rather have traded for him or for Ibaka given what we gave up for Ibaka. I am asking this running under the assumption that we resign ibaka and would have resigned Millsap.
Additionally, Remember that Masai has said that the MLSE has given him the green light to go into the luxury tax.
Personally I would rather go for Serge.
He helps us spread the floor more than Millsap would have. He is younger than Paul. So assuming we would have signed both for 5 years we would be getting a 37 year old Millsap vs a 33 year old Ibaka. Serge has a better history of being an all nba defender. Even though Paul Millsap is a 4 time all star.
Yes Millsap is better right now, but will he be better in 2 years from now?
Additionally, Remember that Masai has said that the MLSE has given him the green light to go into the luxury tax.
Personally I would rather go for Serge.
He helps us spread the floor more than Millsap would have. He is younger than Paul. So assuming we would have signed both for 5 years we would be getting a 37 year old Millsap vs a 33 year old Ibaka. Serge has a better history of being an all nba defender. Even though Paul Millsap is a 4 time all star.
Yes Millsap is better right now, but will he be better in 2 years from now?
Comment