Looking at the roster from our division winning team of 2006-07 and comparing it to our current one leaves me to feel optimistic on how we can turn this ship around and get back on track.

Keep in mind that how terrible most feel we have been to start this season was pretty much exactly how we started the 2006-07. Schedules for the most part could also be considered similar too.

Now I realize there a lots deficiencies that come in to factor (ie coaching, injuries, etc.) but taking that into consideration is it still realistic to think that this team can come close to winning 47 games like that squad did 3 years ago?

So that being said, on paper which roster do you think is better? 2006-06 or the current 2009-10 one?

2006-07 Roster

7 Andrea Bargnani F
4 Chris Bosh F-C
8 Jose Calderon G
3 Juan Dixon G
11 T.J. Ford G
15 Jorge Garbajosa F
14 Joey Graham F
43 Kris Humphries F
6 Luke Jackson F
20 Fred Jones G-F
2 Darrick Martin G
12 Rasho Nesterovic C
18 Anthony Parker G
24 Morris Peterson F
10 Uros Slokar F
9 Pape Sow F
1 P.J. Tucker F

2009-10 Roster

3 Marcus Banks G
7 Andrea Bargnani F
0 Marco Belinelli G
4 Chris Bosh F-C
8 Jose Calderon G
10 DeMar DeRozan G
1 Jarrett Jack G
15 Amir Johnson F
44 Pops Mensah-Bonsu F
12 Rasho Nesterovic C
13 Patrick O'Bryant C
26 Hedo Turkoglu F
24 Sonny Weems G
21 Antoine Wright G-F