Hi everyone, this is my first time starting a thread.
Here's the article from the bleacher report....
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/5...rd-controversy
I HIGHLY disagree with wanting to start Bayless over Calderon, this is not a lost season and Bayless still hasn't developed to being that much better than Calderon. Calderon is still a better true PG, he's a better distributer than Bayless.
Also, although Bayless scored the most and had some key plays near the end of the 4th, it was Barbosa who got us back into the game, but I don't think he should start either.
I know no one else has really said anything about this, but we've had this stupid "Who starts at PG?" controversy since 2006, and it's ridiculous and poisonous to the whole team and organization.
When Jose comes back, lets just give him the starting job back right away REGARDLESS of how he may perform, and someone on the coaching staff should just remind Bayless that he's here to develop and learn off the bench.
What do you guys think?
Here's the article from the bleacher report....
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/5...rd-controversy
I HIGHLY disagree with wanting to start Bayless over Calderon, this is not a lost season and Bayless still hasn't developed to being that much better than Calderon. Calderon is still a better true PG, he's a better distributer than Bayless.
Also, although Bayless scored the most and had some key plays near the end of the 4th, it was Barbosa who got us back into the game, but I don't think he should start either.
I know no one else has really said anything about this, but we've had this stupid "Who starts at PG?" controversy since 2006, and it's ridiculous and poisonous to the whole team and organization.
When Jose comes back, lets just give him the starting job back right away REGARDLESS of how he may perform, and someone on the coaching staff should just remind Bayless that he's here to develop and learn off the bench.
What do you guys think?
Comment