What BC Needs to Do to Keep a Smile On My Face.

[LBF]

jose i don't want to rip[ on you, but, it's time to go.


plus, we can't get rid of a guy who has the audacity, the balls to tuck the ball under his armpit, bend down and tie his shoe in the middle of the game.

i mean, there is just no comparison.

[Apollo]

They're very different players. Parker is obviously a better player, but is not the distributor that Jose is, either. I think you're completely underrating Calderon. He's not exciting, but he knows how to run an offense and make his teammates better. Quite simply, the Raptors played better when he was on the floor (as the earlier thread showed).

Jose plays not to lose, Tony plays to win. It comes down to basketball philosophy. I want the aggressor.

[Tim W.]

Jose plays not to lose, Tony plays to win. It comes down to basketball philosophy. I want the aggressor.

If it's a choice between the two, obviously you take Parker. But it's not, is it? We're not arguing who is the better player, because, hands down, it's Parker. The argument is whether Calderon could start on a contender, which he can. He has a very efficient offensive game, makes his teammates better and is a hard nosed player. I mean, he's certainly no worse than Derek FIsher, BJ Armstrong or John Paxson.