Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The East is going to be much stronger this year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • My prediction

    1a Raptors
    1b Bulls
    3 Cavs
    4a Wizards
    4b Pacers
    6a Hornets
    6b Hawks
    6c Heat

    Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

    Comment


    • My listing:

      1. Bulls
      2. Cavs
      3. Raptors
      4. Washington
      5. Pacers
      6. Hawks
      7. Heat
      8. Hornets
      _________

      9. Magic
      10. NY
      11. Brooklyn
      12. Bucks
      13. Pistons
      14. Celtics
      15. Sixers
      The Baltic Beast is unstoppable!

      Comment


      • enlightenment wrote: View Post
        My listing:

        1. Bulls
        2. Cavs
        3. Raptors
        4. Washington
        5. Pacers
        6. Hawks
        7. Heat
        8. Hornets
        _________

        9. Magic
        10. NY
        11. Brooklyn
        12. Bucks
        13. Pistons
        14. Celtics
        15. Sixers
        You accidently put the Cavs in 2nd...I understand mistakes happen. You should edit to put them in 8 or 9
        For still frame photograph of me reading the DeRozan thread please refer to my avatar

        Comment


        • Primer wrote: View Post
          Actually, yes way. He specifically added an opt out after year one to his 2 year deal. Did he do this for shits and giggles, or so that he had the option to leave Cleveland after this year? I'm leaning towards the latter.
          He added it to maximize his leverage as the cap grows. Lebron pays good money to financial advisors. This is what they advised him to do.

          Primer wrote: View Post
          Irrelevant to the opt out clause after year one. The new TV deal isn't until 2016, so he's justified in the 2 year deal, but not in the year 1 opt out clause, as it will only be 2015 then and the new TV deal will still be a year away.
          Completely relevant. Financial acumen isn't random. Its calculated. This opt out is a calculated move to maximize his earnings in an expanding market.

          Primer wrote: View Post
          2.) Lockout possibility is even further in the future. The next CBA discussion is set for ten years or if necessary in 2017. Lebron's contract ends a year before that, and his opt out clause in 2015 is 2 years before that.

          Neither of your points are valid reasons for an opt out after year one, they literally have no bearing at all.

          The only logical reason Lebron added the opt out clause after year one is so that if things are going the way he likes he can opt out and leave Cleveland. If he had any real loyalty to Cleveland he wouldn't have an opt out after year one.
          Primes your just dead ass wrong. Who ever wrote that letter to Lee Jenkins did a good job of ghost writing what Lebron feels. He is taking his family home to Akron. He is going to stay in Cleveland and he wants to be paid as the best player of his generation. By giving yourself the option to renegotiate your compenstation upwards each and every year in a growing market is smart business. Going home is personal business. The two are mutually exclusive.

          Primer wrote: View Post
          He added it to maximize his leverage as the cap grows.
          Agree. You always want to maximize your leverage in any negotiation. Lebron's advisors have done that.
          There's no such thing as a 2nd round bust.
          - TGO

          Comment



          • Comment


            • FoxMachine wrote: View Post

              Resent to 29 other teams with the team name changed. Equivalent to going to concert and hearing the cities name.

              Comment


              • thead wrote: View Post
                You accidently put the Cavs in 2nd...I understand mistakes happen. You should edit to put them in 8 or 9
                So Lebron's team doesn't automatically get home court advantage? Don't you feel this Cavs team is better than Lebron's previous Cavs teams?
                The Baltic Beast is unstoppable!

                Comment


                • enlightenment wrote: View Post
                  So Lebron's team doesn't automatically get home court advantage? Don't you feel this Cavs team is better than Lebron's previous Cavs teams?
                  nope...I've said it elsewhere...unless they trade some pieces this is a 8th seed.

                  Dion Waiters has already started complaining that he is not coming off the bench.

                  Thompson has plateaued, Wiggins is a rookie and Bennet might as well be. Verajao hasn't played a full healthy season in like 5 years... So barring a trade this is an 8th seed.

                  Irving is a ball dominant PG, Waiters is a ball dominant SG and James is a ball dominant SF...the last time I checked there was only 1 basketball. This team is setup to implode and if they don't trade for complimentary pieces now they certainly will by the trade deadline.
                  For still frame photograph of me reading the DeRozan thread please refer to my avatar

                  Comment


                  • the players are more individually talented than his last cleveland team...but that can sometimes be a problem...egos, roles all matter.

                    THIS CAVS TEAM DOES NOT FIT
                    For still frame photograph of me reading the DeRozan thread please refer to my avatar

                    Comment


                    • thead wrote: View Post
                      nope...I've said it elsewhere...unless they trade some pieces this is a 8th seed.

                      Dion Waiters has already started complaining that he is not coming off the bench.

                      Thompson has plateaued, Wiggins is a rookie and Bennet might as well be. Verajao hasn't played a full healthy season in like 5 years... So barring a trade this is an 8th seed.

                      Irving is a ball dominant PG, Waiters is a ball dominant SG and James is a ball dominant SF...the last time I checked there was only 1 basketball. This team is setup to implode and if they don't trade for complimentary pieces now they certainly will by the trade deadline.
                      I just think it's hard to judge until they get on the court, but given the talent, they could end up anywhere in the playoff picture. And then what if they make a trade or two for pieces that fit better? They could be very scary.

                      Either way I think whatever position they finish in, they probably aren't faves to win the conference because that's hard for any team to do the first year they're together. What works in their favour though is that there is no clear-cut conference favourite at the moment. There's a lot of ifs with many teams.

                      Comment


                      • absolutely if the CAVS make some trades by the deadline they could finish anywhere. The east is wide open. But I promise you, as they are currently constructed they will not be that great
                        For still frame photograph of me reading the DeRozan thread please refer to my avatar

                        Comment


                        • thead wrote: View Post
                          nope...I've said it elsewhere...unless they trade some pieces this is a 8th seed.

                          Dion Waiters has already started complaining that he is not coming off the bench.

                          Thompson has plateaued, Wiggins is a rookie and Bennet might as well be. Verajao hasn't played a full healthy season in like 5 years... So barring a trade this is an 8th seed.

                          Irving is a ball dominant PG, Waiters is a ball dominant SG and James is a ball dominant SF...the last time I checked there was only 1 basketball. This team is setup to implode and if they don't trade for complimentary pieces now they certainly will by the trade deadline.
                          Just wanted to compare a younger Lebrons Final run with the 2006-2007 Cavs team:

                          Larry Hughes - Damon Jones
                          Sasha Pavlovic - Daniel Gibson
                          Lebron James - Ira Newble
                          Drew Gooden - Donyell Marshall
                          Ilgauskas - Varajao

                          = 50 wins, 2nd seed, made it to the NBA Finals


                          This years Cavs team:

                          Irving - Joe Harris
                          Wiggins - Dion Waiters
                          Lebron - Mike Miller
                          Tristan - Anthony Bennet
                          Varajao - Haywood

                          Lets do a comparison, position to position, and bench vs bench.

                          Irving > Hughes
                          Wiggins > Pavlovic (albeit, Pavlovic is good for a spot up 3, and Wiggins is a rookie. Yet, Wiggins will still bring more to the table)
                          Championship Lebron > Young Lebron
                          Tristan = Gooden
                          Varajao < Ilgauskas

                          Really the 2 most important improvements are Irving, and an older Lebron. Wiggins will show flashes in some games that would make this Cavs team overpreform.

                          Both benches are an utter wash. However, at least this years bench has scorers and Mike Miller.

                          Now I understand this is now a different conference (2006 was the year Raps made 3rd seed), but this Cavs team will likely be a lot better than the Cavs that made the finals in 2006.
                          The Baltic Beast is unstoppable!

                          Comment


                          • thead wrote: View Post
                            absolutely if the CAVS make some trades by the deadline they could finish anywhere. The east is wide open. But I promise you, as they are currently constructed they will not be that great
                            They could finish anywhere regardless of trades. Trades would just make it far more likely they're a top 4 seed in the East.

                            Comment


                            • thead wrote: View Post
                              the players are more individually talented than his last cleveland team...but that can sometimes be a problem...egos, roles all matter.

                              THIS CAVS TEAM DOES NOT FIT
                              Fair enough. And it could be argued that the 2006 Cavs team had a better front court, and enough back court shooters to hide their deficiencies in that regard.

                              This years Cavs are however unbalanced, with ball dominant wings next to Lebron, and a weaker front court. So even though individually there is probably more talent on this years team, it could be argued that they aren't likely to work cohesively.

                              However, if things dont work out by midseason, expect a big trade.
                              The Baltic Beast is unstoppable!

                              Comment


                              • Enlightenment you can't compare player to player because its a false representation. If you are saying this team is more talented I 100% agree with you.

                                What I am saying is there are 4 Michael's and no Scottie. They are also not deep. My issue with this CAVS team is not talent but fit. and I don't think Irving or Waiters have it in themselves to submit to lesser roles. Wiggins might but that's not necessarily ideal for him
                                For still frame photograph of me reading the DeRozan thread please refer to my avatar

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X