Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Liston at Sportnet.ca spreading the OPTIMISM!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Liston at Sportnet.ca spreading the OPTIMISM!



    And then there is Jesus... er, I mean Jonas:





    http://www.sportsnet.ca/basketball/n...immer-of-hope/



    Like the Grinch, I think my heart has swelled three sizes today.

  • #2
    If JV was a religion, I'd convert...

    Comment


    • #3
      Matt52 wrote: View Post
      Like the Grinch, I think my heart has swelled three sizes today.
      Hah If you had read this before the "How Optimistic Are You?" thread, would it have improved your score?

      white men can't jump wrote: View Post
      If JV was a religion, I'd convert...
      Jonas Christ? For sure.

      Comment


      • #4
        joey_hesketh wrote: View Post
        Jonas Christ? For sure.
        No, I'd take the chance to resurrect a more polytheistic/pagan style of religion. With JV as the head/father god of a new pantheon, with some of his teammates, who live up to what's needed to help bring the team to the promised land, given the positions of gods alongside him.

        Comment


        • #5
          joey_hesketh wrote: View Post
          Hah If you had read this before the "How Optimistic Are You?" thread, would it have improved your score?



          Jonas Christ? For sure.
          Sadly, no.

          I have no faith in BC. I use to think he had a plan but now he just reminds me of a collared chicken running around with its head cut off.

          Comment


          • #6
            As much as we wont BC gone, these stats show that the Gay trade was definitely an improvement (what, no Jose line-up combo?) for the team and that JV was a great value pick at #5 last year.

            If we can have a starting line-up in the top 10, let alone top 5, and the natural progression of JV along the lines of those players; then we are significantly better than we were 2 years ago. Do we still have issues? Absolutely. We have a flawed roster for max money, but this at least shows that perhaps not all of BC's moves were completely bone-headed.

            Optimism +1
            Heir, Prince of Cambridge

            If you see KeonClark in the wasteland, please share your food and water with him.

            Comment


            • #7
              "Toronto’s starting lineup in the last part of the year of Lowry/DeRozan/Gay/ Johnson/Valanciunas was the fifth, yes fifth, best lineup in the league. You can find the complete list here at basketball-reference.com."

              I was excited until I read the bolded part of that statement. If this was a stat pulled during a part of the season which mattered then it would mean something, but the end of the season was garbage minutes....Gay and DeRozan bombing 3's like there's no tomorrow....nobody was playing defense.

              I'm still optimistic about next season though. Other wise there would be no point in following the team.

              Comment


              • #8
                Mediumcore wrote: View Post
                "Toronto’s starting lineup in the last part of the year of Lowry/DeRozan/Gay/ Johnson/Valanciunas was the fifth, yes fifth, best lineup in the league. You can find the complete list here at basketball-reference.com."

                I was excited until I read the bolded part of that statement. If this was a stat pulled during a part of the season which mattered then it would mean something, but the end of the season was garbage minutes....Gay and DeRozan bombing 3's like there's no tomorrow....nobody was playing defense.

                I'm still optimistic about next season though. Other wise there would be no point in following the team.
                Actually, I don't think that the Stats were just of the last part of the year. I think that the writer meant that this was the Raptors starting line-up during the last part of the year (i.e. after acquiring Gay and when JV returned to the starting line-up). The stats are taken over a fairly large sample.

                Sadly, no.

                I have no faith in BC. I use to think he had a plan but now he just reminds me of a collared chicken running around with its head cut off.
                I see. So BC has deliberately put together a starting 5 that is fifth in the NBA in net points/min but you "have no faith" in him. Putting together an effective starting lineup is obviously his first task. So he drafted DD and JV, and traded for Amir, Gay and Lowry. Objectively, that starting 5 has performed well.

                The Raptors need more depth, with a better back-up PG, another effective big, and reliable scoring. I'll bet that BC and Casey are secretly hoping that Bargnani will somehow convert into an effective bench player for instant offense. I have my doubts about that, but if they are only offered crap for Bargnani I think we might see him as the Raptors' 6th man at the beginning of next season.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Mediumcore wrote: View Post
                  "Toronto’s starting lineup in the last part of the year of Lowry/DeRozan/Gay/ Johnson/Valanciunas was the fifth, yes fifth, best lineup in the league. You can find the complete list here at basketball-reference.com."

                  I was excited until I read the bolded part of that statement. If this was a stat pulled during a part of the season which mattered then it would mean something, but the end of the season was garbage minutes....Gay and DeRozan bombing 3's like there's no tomorrow....nobody was playing defense.

                  I'm still optimistic about next season though. Other wise there would be no point in following the team.
                  I clicked on Liston's link in the article to play with the criteria. I used 42nd-82nd games of season. This lineup played together in 25 games. I don't think the number of games is the issue, it is the minutes (343) or 13.7mpg. Some interesting stuff came up.

                  There were 18 lineups that met criteria.

                  In terms of minutes played together, Raptors were 12th.

                  Net points (per 100 possessions) Raptors were 1st at +14.2. 5th with just 22 more minutes played together was LBJ-Wade-Haslem-Bosh-Chalmers at +10.9.

                  Per 48 minutes net point differential the lineup came 3rd at +11.9.

                  In straight up net points they were 4th at +85.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Well then, that does make things more interesting doesn't it?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Mediumcore wrote: View Post
                      Well then, that does make things more interesting doesn't it?
                      It does.

                      If anything Casey should be criticized for not playing them together enough.

                      The OKC/IND/MEM lineups played 37/32/31 games together for an average of 17.9/20.2/18.0 minutes per game.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Mediumcore wrote: View Post
                        Well then, that does make things more interesting doesn't it?
                        Maybe. I have a bad feeling that next year is going to play out like the 2002-2004 seasons where the whole was not as good as some of the parts and the team got mired in 30s-win seasons.

                        I'm a huge fan of the 5-man unit stats but these results seem illusory to me. Hope I'm wrong.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Matt52 wrote: View Post
                          It does.

                          If anything Casey should be criticized for not playing them together enough.

                          The OKC/IND/MEM lineups played 37/32/31 games together for an average of 17.9/20.2/18.0 minutes per game.

                          I think Casey definitely had a strategy of keeping at least one of DeRozan and Gay on the court at any time, which limited the amount of time they actually play together. And there's some logic to that on paper, as either of those guys should be the focal point on offense when the other one isn't on the floor, and so it should be possible to get them matchups against the opposing team's bench players. The big problem is that with a couple shot-happy guys on our bench, our starters wouldn't be that focal point when on the floor alongside backups, and there isn't enough ball movement to get them favorable matchups.

                          Perhaps it's the better strategy to join DeRozan and Gay at the hip, and let the second unit wing players try to weather their minutes without those guys. But Fields and Ross don't really have complementary games for playing long stretches together, especially when the offense is as stagnant as our second unit. Put in a pass-first PG in the second unit and it might be a different matter.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            octothorp wrote: View Post
                            I think Casey definitely had a strategy of keeping at least one of DeRozan and Gay on the court at any time, which limited the amount of time they actually play together. And there's some logic to that on paper, as either of those guys should be the focal point on offense when the other one isn't on the floor, and so it should be possible to get them matchups against the opposing team's bench players. The big problem is that with a couple shot-happy guys on our bench, our starters wouldn't be that focal point when on the floor alongside backups, and there isn't enough ball movement to get them favorable matchups.

                            Perhaps it's the better strategy to join DeRozan and Gay at the hip, and let the second unit wing players try to weather their minutes without those guys. But Fields and Ross don't really have complementary games for playing long stretches together, especially when the offense is as stagnant as our second unit. Put in a pass-first PG in the second unit and it might be a different matter.
                            Barring injury or foul trouble, first 8 mins to start game, first 8 mins to start 2nd half, last 6 mins of the game gives you 20 mins together and is easy enough to do.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X