Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wouldn't it make more sense to play Lin instead of FVV at this point..?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wouldn't it make more sense to play Lin instead of FVV at this point..?

    Experts told me that the reason why Lin has been sitting on the bench is because he was bad.

    But could Lin possibly be worse than FVV at this point..?

    Isn't Lin also a better defender than FVV?

  • S.R.
    replied
    KeonClark wrote: View Post

    The heat are a different animal. They're like a mafia, Haslem is a capo in the Mickey arison family
    This is a man who falls asleep every night with The Godfather on TV:

    Leave a comment:


  • KeonClark
    replied
    golden wrote: View Post

    Neither here nor there, but the Heat just waived a young guy to make room for 39 yr. old Udonis Haslem. lol.
    The heat are a different animal. They're like a mafia, Haslem is a capo in the Mickey arison family

    Leave a comment:


  • golden
    replied
    S.R. wrote: View Post
    What Jeremy Lin is running into now is the salary cap trend where far more teams would rather fill out their roster with cheap young guys, even G-League level guys or raw prospects that may never pan out, rather than multi-million dollar vets who are likely to play very little anyway. It used to be the opposite, but you have to save cap space for your stars now partially by just not paying vets and also by finding young prospects on cheap contracts that you can burn minutes on. The days of say, a 38 year old Kurt Thomas getting 20+ mpg and occasional starts to put up 4 points and 6 rebounds and be a "locker room presence" are long, long gone.
    Neither here nor there, but the Heat just waived a young guy to make room for 39 yr. old Udonis Haslem. lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • S.R.
    replied
    What Jeremy Lin is running into now is the salary cap trend where far more teams would rather fill out their roster with cheap young guys, even G-League level guys or raw prospects that may never pan out, rather than multi-million dollar vets who are likely to play very little anyway. It used to be the opposite, but you have to save cap space for your stars now partially by just not paying vets and also by finding young prospects on cheap contracts that you can burn minutes on. The days of say, a 38 year old Kurt Thomas getting 20+ mpg and occasional starts to put up 4 points and 6 rebounds and be a "locker room presence" are long, long gone.
    Last edited by S.R.; Tue Jul 30th, 2019, 10:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • golden
    replied
    Puffer wrote: View Post

    Not above trading either of these guys for players or picks if there is a good chance to improve, but deciding if there is a chance is the problem. The other question is what is the chance either player improves?

    Freddy is not a great facilitator. He might not even be a "good" one. His shooting is strong, plays very good defense and is overall a heads up player, but every team looking at him will remember the games where is height was a problem. They will also be well aware of his ability to act as a PG. I think this will limit what anybody would offer. I don't have a clue what next season's draft class looks like. Masai and company have shown a good ability to find gems in the draft, or at least rotation players. What kind of a pick would Freddy bring back? Considering the average career for an NBA player is 6 years (as of 2010 - it's been trending upward), a lot of draft picks washout. What pick would you take back for Freddy and what pick would reasonably be offered? 20-25?

    Norm is more or less a different case from my perspective. It seems like he kind of woke up. He might now be at a place where he can put "Bad Norm" away and only pull out "Good Norm." Good Norm is a player I would want on my team. Good D, strong drive to the hoop if he does it under control and he is a 3 pt shooter, which this team is going to need several of to get the most effective use out of Gasol. Or whoever replaces him next season. Again, it's a question of what you can get back. Not sure why another team would give you high picks, or even an equal player back.
    This article thinks that Fred's free agent value will be fairly high....

    The best NBA free agents in 2020, ranked
    https://www.sbnation.com/nba/2019/7/...wn-buddy-hield

    Leave a comment:


  • Puffer
    replied
    golden wrote: View Post
    ...If you want to "I told you so" on me for anything, it's that I suggested in the Sixers and Bucks series that most of Fred's minutes should go to Powell - which is what Nurse ended up doing until Fred Jr. arrived. Go back and look at my rotation suggestions - Lin is nowhere in sight. And Playoff Norm showed up this year, so I don't see anything wrong with either Powell or FVV.

    Sell high.
    Not above trading either of these guys for players or picks if there is a good chance to improve, but deciding if there is a chance is the problem. The other question is what is the chance either player improves?

    Freddy is not a great facilitator. He might not even be a "good" one. His shooting is strong, plays very good defense and is overall a heads up player, but every team looking at him will remember the games where is height was a problem. They will also be well aware of his ability to act as a PG. I think this will limit what anybody would offer. I don't have a clue what next season's draft class looks like. Masai and company have shown a good ability to find gems in the draft, or at least rotation players. What kind of a pick would Freddy bring back? Considering the average career for an NBA player is 6 years (as of 2010 - it's been trending upward), a lot of draft picks washout. What pick would you take back for Freddy and what pick would reasonably be offered? 20-25?

    Norm is more or less a different case from my perspective. It seems like he kind of woke up. He might now be at a place where he can put "Bad Norm" away and only pull out "Good Norm." Good Norm is a player I would want on my team. Good D, strong drive to the hoop if he does it under control and he is a 3 pt shooter, which this team is going to need several of to get the most effective use out of Gasol. Or whoever replaces him next season. Again, it's a question of what you can get back. Not sure why another team would give you high picks, or even an equal player back.

    Leave a comment:


  • GOLDBLUM
    replied
    golden wrote: View Post

    lol. Looking back, I'm not even sure what Dan and I were arguing about, tbh, because we were agreeing on like 90% of the main issue, which was how FVV was being used by Nurse at the time (i.e. way beyond his capabilities). I suppose the main flashpoint was that I was saying that FVV's limitations rendered him a replaceable player, which we saw in the Orlando and Sixers series and half of the Bucks series. FVV was definitely exposed vs. length, and we will continue to see that in certain matchups going forward.
    Be that as it may, it's very possible we don't win the Championship without him.
    He showed out when it mattered and then some.
    (...not that you're suggesting otherwise, necessarily.)

    Leave a comment:


  • golden
    replied
    Puffer wrote: View Post

    LOL. Right you are, it was a shoot from the hip snark. I was simply referencing the statement at the top of this page, "DanH has been exposed badly in these playoffs - just like FVV. Almost everything his stats predict or suggest we should do is turning out wrong." Fred was having a terrible shooting stretch in the playoffs. But a lot of folks thought he was playing well defensively. Dan insisted that his impact was positive overall, significantly moreso than could be expected from Lin, who was a disaster in his time playing with the Raptors in the regular season. I would say Dan was bang on with that observation.

    My comment was a playful potshot. Glad you took it that way.

    Have a good day.
    lol. Looking back, I'm not even sure what Dan and I were arguing about, tbh, because we were agreeing on like 90% of the main issue, which was how FVV was being used by Nurse at the time (i.e. way beyond his capabilities). I suppose the main flashpoint was that I was saying that FVV's limitations rendered him a replaceable player, which we saw in the Orlando and Sixers series and half of the Bucks series. FVV was definitely exposed vs. length, and we will continue to see that in certain matchups going forward.

    Leave a comment:


  • Puffer
    replied
    golden wrote: View Post

    lol. You got the wrong guy here, Puff. I never said Lin should replace Fred in the lineup. More that, FVV simply sucked, in part because Nurse was trying to make him be a point guard, which he isn't and also because of his physical limitations. I kept pointing out that Lin sucked ever since coming here (more than any other time in his career), and I thought it was because he couldn't adapt to Nurse' giving his player's more freedom. My point was, and still is, that FVV can be replaced with backup PGs like DJ Augustin and that ilk. And that Fred is unplayable in certain matchups. Both of those things are still true.

    If you want to "I told you so" on me for anything, it's that I suggested in the Sixers and Bucks series that most of Fred's minutes should go to Powell - which is what Nurse ended up doing until Fred Jr. arrived. Go back and look at my rotation suggestions - Lin is nowhere in sight. And Playoff Norm showed up this year, so I don't see anything wrong with either Powell or FVV.

    Sell high.
    LOL. Right you are, it was a shoot from the hip snark. I was simply referencing the statement at the top of this page, "DanH has been exposed badly in these playoffs - just like FVV. Almost everything his stats predict or suggest we should do is turning out wrong." Fred was having a terrible shooting stretch in the playoffs. But a lot of folks thought he was playing well defensively. Dan insisted that his impact was positive overall, significantly moreso than could be expected from Lin, who was a disaster in his time playing with the Raptors in the regular season. I would say Dan was bang on with that observation.

    My comment was a playful potshot. Glad you took it that way.

    Have a good day.

    Leave a comment:


  • golden
    replied
    Puffer wrote: View Post

    Maybe Dan H was correct about the merits of Freddy vs Lin. Hotfuzz, Golden, where are you?
    lol. You got the wrong guy here, Puff. I never said Lin should replace Fred in the lineup. More that, FVV simply sucked, in part because Nurse was trying to make him be a point guard, which he isn't and also because of his physical limitations. I kept pointing out that Lin sucked ever since coming here (more than any other time in his career), and I thought it was because he couldn't adapt to Nurse' giving his player's more freedom. My point was, and still is, that FVV can be replaced with backup PGs like DJ Augustin and that ilk. And that Fred is unplayable in certain matchups. Both of those things are still true.

    If you want to "I told you so" on me for anything, it's that I suggested in the Sixers and Bucks series that most of Fred's minutes should go to Powell - which is what Nurse ended up doing until Fred Jr. arrived. Go back and look at my rotation suggestions - Lin is nowhere in sight. And Playoff Norm showed up this year, so I don't see anything wrong with either Powell or FVV.

    Sell high.

    Leave a comment:


  • MixxAOR
    replied
    DanH wrote: View Post

    I don't really feel like making the argument that we should play the actual NBA rotation player over the guy who was decidedly not that should qualify as "correct." I love patting myself on the back on the rare occasion where I'm right but this one doesn't exactly feel earned.
    What a flex lol

    Leave a comment:


  • DanH
    replied
    Puffer wrote: View Post

    Maybe Dan H was correct about the merits of Freddy vs Lin. Hotfuzz, Golden, where are you?
    I don't really feel like making the argument that we should play the actual NBA rotation player over the guy who was decidedly not that should qualify as "correct." I love patting myself on the back on the rare occasion where I'm right but this one doesn't exactly feel earned.

    Leave a comment:


  • Puffer
    replied
    Kawhisexual wrote: View Post

    yup it did not haha, Fredy sure made up for his early struggles during playoffs
    Maybe Dan H was correct about the merits of Freddy vs Lin. Hotfuzz, Golden, where are you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kawhisexual
    replied
    GOLDBLUM wrote: View Post
    Eek... this thread didn’t age well. Lol.
    yup it did not haha, Fredy sure made up for his early struggles during playoffs

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X