slaw wrote:
View Post
Shaolin is probably trying to view things without that existing framework. Removing the way things are done now, why does it make sense to have a system where two parties sign a contract, but only one party has the power to move that contract off when they don't want it anymore?
If teams are free to trade players, why wouldn't players be free to request trades? It's not like free agency is the balance to this, where the player can force a team to sign him if they don't want to, while players are free to choose their teams. In free agency, players can choose their teams, and teams can choose their players. In trades, by the rules, teams get to choose their players, while players don't have any choice.
One can certainly argue that it's what they sign up for when they sign their contracts, and, sure. That is indeed the way the system is now. But the way the system is now is also the system that is very accommodating toward those trade requests. So if we're talking about changing the system to prevent this stuff from happening, then the larger discussion of which way it SHOULD be seems to be more relevant.
Comment