We lost a superstar.. most teams that lose a superstar fall into the lottery. I don't think we're going to be that bad.. but most people who analyze the NBA aren't very good at their jobs.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Where Do The Raptors Rank In The East?
Collapse
X
-
KeonClark wrote: View Post
We lost Danny green and some other guy in LA that I hear was pretty good, and replaced them with fringe scrubs. It's a prove em year once again for the underdogs up north.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
slaw wrote: View Post
Are they that much worse than the 15/16, 16/17, 17/18 Raps? Those teams won almost 170 games. I get that everything is relative to the opponents but you go back and look at those rosters and the 12-man group this year's roster looks just fine in comparison.
Comment
-
slaw wrote: View PostMan, reading some of the ECF previews. Does anyone like this Raps team? I mean, geez, they've still got Lowry, Siakam, Gasol and Ibaka. They've got a bunch of decent young guys as well and..... they won't make the playoffs? I'll be shocked if they miss the playoffs. Man, I'll be a little surprised if they don't have home court. Perhaps I am underrating a bunch of teams but outside of the Bucks and Sixers and maybe the Celts (ugh), I don't see any other ECF as being materially better than Toronto and Boston is a wildcard.
Now next year - when KD and Oladipo are healthy and the Nets and Pacers move up the standings, the East projects to be a lot more competitive. But for now there's still a big drop off after the first couple of teams and Toronto's as talented or more talented than the bulk of the East by almost any objective analysis."We're playing in a building." -- Kawhi Leonard
- 3 likes
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View PostWe lost a superstar.. most teams that lose a superstar fall into the lottery. I don't think we're going to be that bad.. but most people who analyze the NBA aren't very good at their jobs.
Comment
-
slaw wrote: View Post
Are they that much worse than the 15/16, 16/17, 17/18 Raps? Those teams won almost 170 games. I get that everything is relative to the opponents but you go back and look at those rosters and the 12-man group this year's roster looks just fine in comparison.9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
-
SkywalkerAC wrote: View Post
Thanks, but did any of those teams win the title that year previous?
Didn't the Heat also lose Bosh and Ray Allen? (Bosh only played 44 games apparently)
From my perspective it's essentially the same team as the Casey/DeMar/Lowry era. We just swapped DeMar with Pascal and have a new head coach. Only thing that will knock us down a peg or two is the championship hangover.
Comment
-
bertarapsfan wrote: View PostSpeaking of Harden has anyone seen his new move he has been working on over the summer? I didn't know if it was just a summer workout video gag but it looks like its going to be a real thing he just whipped it out in the first preseason game. Its basically a 1 legged variation of his step back.
Comment
-
We'll be fine.
Only teams that I see are clearly more stacked than us are the Sixers and Bucks.
I think the Nets will also surprise and probably sneak ahead of us, but as long as we have a healthy year I see us slotting in as the 4th seed.
Comment
-
Scraptor wrote: View PostWe'll be fine.
Only teams that I see are clearly more stacked than us are the Sixers and Bucks.
I think the Nets will also surprise and probably sneak ahead of us, but as long as we have a healthy year I see us slotting in as the 4th seed.
The Nets are going to be interesting...I agree they could sneak in as high as 3 but for me they slot more to 5 or 6.
Irving had Horford last year in Chowdertown. This year he has a declining Jordan. The lobs and corresponding dunks will be epic highlight reel stuff.. but DeAndre Jordan isn't in the same snack bracket as Al Horford from my cheap seat. Horford could play inside on the PnR and stretch the floor and make 3's. Old man river is the complete package. Jordan while good to me isn't as multi faceted as old man river.
It depends on your view on if you rate the Levert and Dinwidde combo being better or worse or same than Smart and Brown... Say its a wash.... but the wings in Brooklyn right now...Prince and Harris prolly aren't as good as the Hayward/Tatum duo.
To me.. sans Durant... the Nets are this years wild card...
If Irving can get them to 3 it will be his best reg season year... but.. and there is always a but.... Irving is injury prone and likely won't play more than 65 games. He has had 3 knee procedures...
Virtual beer that they finish closer to 6 than 3.There's no such thing as a 2nd round bust.
- TGO
Comment
-
Demographic Shift wrote: View Post
Agree we are going to be fine... maybe more than fine.
The Nets are going to be interesting...I agree they could sneak in as high as 3 but for me they slot more to 5 or 6.
Irving had Horford last year in Chowdertown. This year he has a declining Jordan. The lobs and corresponding dunks will be epic highlight reel stuff.. but DeAndre Jordan isn't in the same snack bracket as Al Horford from my cheap seat. Horford could play inside on the PnR and stretch the floor and make 3's. Old man river is the complete package. Jordan while good to me isn't as multi faceted as old man river.
It depends on your view on if you rate the Levert and Dinwidde combo being better or worse or same than Smart and Brown... Say its a wash.... but the wings in Brooklyn right now...Prince and Harris prolly aren't as good as the Hayward/Tatum duo.
To me.. sans Durant... the Nets are this years wild card...
If Irving can get them to 3 it will be his best reg season year... but.. and there is always a but.... Irving is injury prone and likely won't play more than 65 games. He has had 3 knee procedures...
Virtual beer that they finish closer to 6 than 3.
Comment
Comment