I agree with you hannibal, I would love to see Beal on our squad but who do we give up if he is even available??
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything NBA 2020-21
Collapse
X
-
JawsGT wrote: View Post
The raps started 2-8 dude. You said yourself they squandered a bunch of winnable games. If they were 5-5 in that stretch, they would be 15-11 right now and in 3rd place basically tied with the nets. They are better than their record, but probably not a threat to the best in the league. But better than the knicks.
The rest of the season, the schedule gets harder and harder and this team hasn’t show any consistency doing anything in over 27 games now.Last edited by iblastoff; Sun Feb 14, 2021, 11:42 PM.
Comment
-
NBA franchise valuations, per Forbes:- New York Knicks: $5 billion
- Golden State Warriors: $4.7 billion
- Los Angeles Lakers: $4.6 billion
- Chicago Bulls: $3.3 billion
- Boston Celtics: $3.2 billion
- Los Angeles Clippers: $2.75 billion
- Brooklyn Nets: $2.65 billion
- Houston Rockets: $2.5 billion
- Dallas Mavericks: $2.45 billion
- Toronto Raptors: $2.15 billion
- Philadelphia 76ers: $2.075 billion
- Miami Heat: $2 billion
- Portland Trail Blazers: $1.9 billion
- San Antonio Spurs: $1.85 billion
- Sacramento Kings: $1.825 billion
- Washington Wizards: $1.8 billion
- Phoenix Suns: $1.7 billion
- Utah Jazz: $1.66 billion
- Denver Nuggets: $1.65 billion
- Milwaukee Bucks: $1.625 billion
- Oklahoma City Thunder: $1.575 billion
- Cleveland Cavaliers: $1.56 billion
- Indiana Pacers: $1.55 billion
- Atlanta Hawks: $1.52 billion
- Charlotte Hornets: $1.5 billion
- Orlando Magic: $1.46 billion
- Detroit Pistons: $1.45 billion
- Minnesota Timberwolves: $1.4 billion
- New Orleans Pelicans: $1.35 billion
- Memphis Grizzlies: $1.3 billion
Comment
-
Yuri Gagarin wrote: View PostNBA franchise valuations, per Forbes:- New York Knicks: $5 billion
- Golden State Warriors: $4.7 billion
- Los Angeles Lakers: $4.6 billion
- Chicago Bulls: $3.3 billion
- Boston Celtics: $3.2 billion
- Los Angeles Clippers: $2.75 billion
- Brooklyn Nets: $2.65 billion
- Houston Rockets: $2.5 billion
- Dallas Mavericks: $2.45 billion
- Toronto Raptors: $2.15 billion
- Philadelphia 76ers: $2.075 billion
- Miami Heat: $2 billion
- Portland Trail Blazers: $1.9 billion
- San Antonio Spurs: $1.85 billion
- Sacramento Kings: $1.825 billion
- Washington Wizards: $1.8 billion
- Phoenix Suns: $1.7 billion
- Utah Jazz: $1.66 billion
- Denver Nuggets: $1.65 billion
- Milwaukee Bucks: $1.625 billion
- Oklahoma City Thunder: $1.575 billion
- Cleveland Cavaliers: $1.56 billion
- Indiana Pacers: $1.55 billion
- Atlanta Hawks: $1.52 billion
- Charlotte Hornets: $1.5 billion
- Orlando Magic: $1.46 billion
- Detroit Pistons: $1.45 billion
- Minnesota Timberwolves: $1.4 billion
- New Orleans Pelicans: $1.35 billion
- Memphis Grizzlies: $1.3 billion
I don't think the GSW are valued higher than the lakers.
Same for Clippers above the Nets or for that matter, Raptors above the Heat (culture)
Comment
-
Yuri Gagarin wrote: View PostNBA franchise valuations, per Forbes:- New York Knicks: $5 billion
- Golden State Warriors: $4.7 billion
- Los Angeles Lakers: $4.6 billion
- Chicago Bulls: $3.3 billion
- Boston Celtics: $3.2 billion
- Los Angeles Clippers: $2.75 billion
- Brooklyn Nets: $2.65 billion
- Houston Rockets: $2.5 billion
- Dallas Mavericks: $2.45 billion
- Toronto Raptors: $2.15 billion
- Philadelphia 76ers: $2.075 billion
- Miami Heat: $2 billion
- Portland Trail Blazers: $1.9 billion
- San Antonio Spurs: $1.85 billion
- Sacramento Kings: $1.825 billion
- Washington Wizards: $1.8 billion
- Phoenix Suns: $1.7 billion
- Utah Jazz: $1.66 billion
- Denver Nuggets: $1.65 billion
- Milwaukee Bucks: $1.625 billion
- Oklahoma City Thunder: $1.575 billion
- Cleveland Cavaliers: $1.56 billion
- Indiana Pacers: $1.55 billion
- Atlanta Hawks: $1.52 billion
- Charlotte Hornets: $1.5 billion
- Orlando Magic: $1.46 billion
- Detroit Pistons: $1.45 billion
- Minnesota Timberwolves: $1.4 billion
- New Orleans Pelicans: $1.35 billion
- Memphis Grizzlies: $1.3 billion
That's How much a ring costs.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnb...n-pay-off.html
Comment
-
can't teach wingspan wrote: View PostI'm not buying these rumours about Drummond and the Raps. Personally, I'm holding out for Vucevic. Orlando is through this season with their injury troubles and are likely to sell at the deadline."Never apologize for coming to me. Office hours are for patients.
My kitchen is always open to friends"
Comment
-
The Great One wrote: View PostNot sure where to find "clutch" stats or if there's even a website for it. But i'm pretty sure Zach LaVine is #1 in clutch made field goals this year. Dude has been unbelievable. And I gotta go with Dame #2(not really shocking though).
lavine this year is shooting 36.4% from the field and 27.3% from 3, which is not very good at all, though he is getting to the line. i dunno maybe you're bit bias? he fares quite a bit better on this other site that defines clutch differently then NBA.com, where he's on par with fred vanvleet.
Comment
-
S.R. wrote: View Post
The only knock on MJ here is how relatively short his peak was compared to these other guys, especially with the time out due to retirement. I mean MJ was starting his Washington Wizards stint - with a potbelly after 2 retirements - when he was the age Lebron and Brady now are. Lebron and Brady are still winning championships, MJ had taken 3.5 years off in the meantime and was still unquestionably done at this stage of his career.
This debate is getting dumber and dumber every day though. Wade on TNT last week mentioned Serena Williams as the GOAT of all GOAT lol. The argument for Serena is she has won 23 grand slams. First of all tennis players have 4 chances every year to win a grand slam. You only get one in football. And does Wade know that Margaret Court has won 24 grand slams? Steffi Graf has 22. Are they better than Brady too? so how about Roger Federer and Rafa Nadal? both have 20 grand slams. Are they better than Brady too? Djokovic has 17. Djokovic > Brady? Why only mention Serena?
Shaq on the other hand mentioned Floyd Mayweather as the GOAT of GOAT which actually is the dumber argument. His argument is that Floyd retired undefeated. I'm not sure he's aware that there are a BUNCH of boxers that retired undefeated not just Floyd lol. In boxing there are only 2 names that you need to know: Ali and Sugar Ray Robinson. That's it. Hell i'd take Pacquiao over Floyd too. Pacquiao is the only 8 division champion in boxing history.
Mamba Mentality
Comment
-
The Great One wrote: View Post
Jordan is the only guy that can make a legit argument that he's the GOAT North American athlete of all time and not Brady. The others? nah. It's Brady and Jordan. That's it. Maybe add LeBron if he wins a couple more rings.
This debate is getting dumber and dumber every day though. Wade on TNT last week mentioned Serena Williams as the GOAT of all GOAT lol. The argument for Serena is she has won 23 grand slams. First of all tennis players have 4 chances every year to win a grand slam. You only get one in football. And does Wade know that Margaret Court has won 24 grand slams? Steffi Graf has 22. Are they better than Brady too? so how about Roger Federer and Rafa Nadal? both have 20 grand slams. Are they better than Brady too? Djokovic has 17. Djokovic > Brady? Why only mention Serena?
Shaq on the other hand mentioned Floyd Mayweather as the GOAT of GOAT which actually is the dumber argument. His argument is that Floyd retired undefeated. I'm not sure he's aware that there are a BUNCH of boxers that retired undefeated not just Floyd lol. In boxing there are only 2 names that you need to know: Ali and Sugar Ray Robinson. That's it. Hell i'd take Pacquiao over Floyd too. Pacquiao is the only 8 division champion in boxing history.
Look at the great players a Gretzky had to get by to win Stanley Cups in a yearly war of attrition. Including the 2-4 greatest players of all time. Dozens of other Hall of Famers.
Look at the other all time great quarterbacks Brady has had to get by every season.
Same for Federer. Hell, he's playing Nadal and Djokovic at the same time, two guys who would be in the conversation for tennis GOAT by themselves lol.
Serena? Played a bunch of short career tiny no-talents by comparison.
Comment
-
The Great One wrote: View Post
This debate is getting dumber and dumber every day though.
look at the intensity
- 4 likes
Comment
-
G__Deane wrote: View Post
Serena Williams faced the weakest competition of any elite athlete in the history of the planet. Who was her main competition over the last 10 years? Nobody but her own injuries. Maybe not her fault but that's why she can't be included in any GOAT of GOAT of goat discussions.
Look at the great players a Gretzky had to get by to win Stanley Cups in a yearly war of attrition. Including the 2-4 greatest players of all time. Dozens of other Hall of Famers.
Look at the other all time great quarterbacks Brady has had to get by every season.
Same for Federer. Hell, he's playing Nadal and Djokovic at the same time, two guys who would be in the conversation for tennis GOAT by themselves lol.
Serena? Played a bunch of short career tiny no-talents by comparison.
Roger Federer is the greatest tennis player of all time. Forget the 20 grand slams. His peak was higher than Nadal and Djokovic and Serena. Also, look at the competition. Everytime he makes the finals it's always against Djokovic or Nadal lol. Those 2 imo are second and third greatest men's tennis player of all time.
Mamba Mentality
Comment
Comment