Bonga had some moments but again I think that we already have a lot of... "projects" on the main squad right now. So maybe this is one too many projects. He is young but I would say Ish over him. It comes down to Bonga vs Dekker I guess. Did you all see enough from Dekker to think that he can be better than just a tall Matt Thomas
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Raptors 2021-2022 Preseason + Training Camp
Collapse
X
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View Post
If I am remembering correctly Oshae Brissett had an injury at that time so we had to go with someone who could play on the actual team.Last edited by blackjitsu; Fri Oct 15, 2021, 02:33 PM.
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View PostBonga had some moments but again I think that we already have a lot of... "projects" on the main squad right now. So maybe this is one too many projects. He is young but I would say Ish over him. It comes down to Bonga vs Dekker I guess. Did you all see enough from Dekker to think that he can be better than just a tall Matt Thomas
Comment
-
blackjitsu wrote: View Post
He used to be more athletic than Thomas, but a tall Matt Thomas has job in the NBA. Height is a big reason why Thomas sometimes struggled to get his shot off. If Dekker works with the staff he should get some of that athleticism back. And his length allows him to play some zone. For deep bench, tall Matt Thomas is a decent player
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View PostBonga had some moments but again I think that we already have a lot of... "projects" on the main squad right now. So maybe this is one too many projects. He is young but I would say Ish over him. It comes down to Bonga vs Dekker I guess. Did you all see enough from Dekker to think that he can be better than just a tall Matt Thomas
Bonga has more upside, Dekker is who he is more or less.
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View PostBonga had some moments but again I think that we already have a lot of... "projects" on the main squad right now. So maybe this is one too many projects. He is young but I would say Ish over him. It comes down to Bonga vs Dekker I guess. Did you all see enough from Dekker to think that he can be better than just a tall Matt Thomas
Now granted, like any shooter, there will be games he'll go 0-4. That comes from the attention the opposing defence will have to devote to guard him, but because of that extra attention, that usually means someone else on the team is going off, as the floor is stretched out.
Dekker is like one of those random guys the raptors often run into that murder us from 3. The Korkmazes, Mike Scott's, McDermott's and Ojelyes of he world. We always run into those guys, and I always ask myself the same two questions: 1. Who the heck is this guy? and 2. How come we never have a guy like that?
I hope we keep Dekker, so when we're bogged down on the half court without Lowry and nothing else is working, we throw him out there for a spark. We'll keep Bonga instead though, because he's an average defender and we're obsessed with energy bigs that can't shoot. He'll be a non-entity at the end of the bench because he doesn't bring anything different from what's already abundant in the rest of the roster. Then another team will pick up Dekker, he'll go 3 for 6 on us from deep, and we'll wonder what could have been.
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View Post
If I am remembering correctly Oshae Brissett had an injury at that time so we had to go with someone who could play on the actual team.
I could see us cutting Dekker, him finding a place somewhere in the league, and averaging over 40% from 3 and finding a place on some teams bench. We have good scouts. There is a reason why Sam, Ish and Isaac made our camp. We see something in all three of them. And that makes them all sort of valuable.
Comment
-
For the people who watched the preseason closely:
- Did anything surprise you? Good or bad.
- Did anything happen that materially changed your expectations for the team?
- Did anything happen that materially changed your expectations for a player?
- Based on preseason, do you think this is a playoff team?
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
Yeah I believe he got cut because he got hurt. In hindsight would have been better off cutting someone like McCaw, Johnson, Bembry or Thomas (although he might have had a guaranteed deal the following year). But like I said, you win some and lose some.
I could see us cutting Dekker, him finding a place somewhere in the league, and averaging over 40% from 3 and finding a place on some teams bench. We have good scouts. There is a reason why Sam, Ish and Isaac made our camp. We see something in all three of them. And that makes them all sort of valuable.
Long story short there are guys we should have opted to cut over Oshae, however, it would have lead to the cutting of Yuta first more than likely. It was bad luck honestly. I go back and forth on Dekk and Bonga. I get the argument for Dekker over Bonga, because we could use more offense if a guy like Yuta goes down and we end up trading Boucher.
Comment
-
slaw wrote: View PostFor the people who watched the preseason closely:
- Did anything surprise you? Good or bad.
- Did anything happen that materially changed your expectations for the team?
- Did anything happen that materially changed your expectations for a player?
- Based on preseason, do you think this is a playoff team?
Playoffs... I was impressed at how close of a game we played against Boston. It appeared guys were trying in that game. We were playing without Siakam, Boucher, and Birch and they didn't have Brown, or Schoder... which is a wash IMO. Many media members are predicting that the Celtics are a top 6 team(not to put too much stock in media opinion), I think we are on equal ground with them.
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View Post
Long story short there are guys we should have opted to cut over Oshae, however, it would have lead to the cutting of Yuta first more than likely. It was bad luck honestly. I go back and forth on Dekk and Bonga. I get the argument for Dekker over Bonga, because we could use more offense if a guy like Yuta goes down and we end up trading Boucher.
Bonga provides many of the things other guys already on the team provide like defense on every position and playmaking. If we were able to select Bonga as a 2nd round pick as he is today, I would be thrilled cause I know in a season or two under our coaching development staff he will probably be a good roleplayer on this team and not be such a black hole on offence (he is only 22 years old this season).
So for this season and next Dekker is the guy but in two years it might be Bonga as the guy.
Comment
-
slaw wrote: View PostFor the people who watched the preseason closely:
- Did anything surprise you? Good or bad.
- Did anything happen that materially changed your expectations for the team?
- Did anything happen that materially changed your expectations for a player?
- Based on preseason, do you think this is a playoff team?
- No, I still think they are still fringe playoff team.
- I think Siakam can take it easier and play off of OG and Barnes now.
- They have potential to be 8th seedOnly one thing matters: We The Champs.
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View PostBonga had some moments but again I think that we already have a lot of... "projects" on the main squad right now. So maybe this is one too many projects. He is young but I would say Ish over him. It comes down to Bonga vs Dekker I guess. Did you all see enough from Dekker to think that he can be better than just a tall Matt Thomas
The 15th roster spot should absolutely be used on a project because they won't get any minutes. Bonga has a lot of potential so I hope it's him. We pay him the min and develop him on the 905 and maybe he's an absolute steal in a year. Dekker is what he is, a streaky shooter who flunked out of the NBA. He may go off like he did our last pre-season game, and he may miss every single shot like he did the game before that. You can't depend on him at this level. If we go with Dekker I won't be pissed because it's the 15th spot and ultimately doesn't matter but I don't see any good reason for it to be Dekker.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Primer wrote: View Post
If we go with Dekker I won't be pissed because it's the 15th spot and ultimately doesn't matter but I don't see any good reason for it to be Dekker.
The Raptors aren't planning to compete for a championship for at least 2 years given their roster and current NBA landscape. The only reason to keep Dekker might be as a throw in sweetner for a packaged trade this trade deadline for a team looking for shooting at the 4 spot come playoffs time. Maybe it would help with Dallas meeting the Raptors trade demand if Dekker had a good season.
Comment
Comment