Hotshot wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Raptors Offseason 2022
Collapse
X
-
I'm sure Malachi and Banton will get their chances, but I have my doubts about either really claiming a top 9 spot (we probably won't run consistently 10 deep). Same for Koloko, unless he really surprises.
You'll have one primary (Fred/Scottie/Pascal) or sometimes two with the bench so no real need for a Flynn or Banton. And the rest of the bench group should be a) Trent, scorer to be the finisher and off ball threat for whichever starter is anchoring the lineup, and b) as many wacky big 6'9" guys as they can manage - in other words, Otto, Boucher and Thad, more often than not.
- 3 likes
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostI'm sure Malachi and Banton will get their chances, but I have my doubts about either really claiming a top 9 spot (we probably won't run consistently 10 deep). Same for Koloko, unless he really surprises.
You'll have one primary (Fred/Scottie/Pascal) or sometimes two with the bench so no real need for a Flynn or Banton. And the rest of the bench group should be a) Trent, scorer to be the finisher and off ball threat for whichever starter is anchoring the lineup, and b) as many wacky big 6'9" guys as they can manage - in other words, Otto, Boucher and Thad, more often than not.
And so less staggering of those guys and more trust in Dalano and Malachi should be in order. If we don't trust those two kids, well then that's the way it goes. Just sucks that we didn't get some veteran playmaker to help us out in case they do suck this year.
Comment
-
-
DanH wrote: View PostI'm sure Malachi and Banton will get their chances, but I have my doubts about either really claiming a top 9 spot (we probably won't run consistently 10 deep). Same for Koloko, unless he really surprises.
You'll have one primary (Fred/Scottie/Pascal) or sometimes two with the bench so no real need for a Flynn or Banton. And the rest of the bench group should be a) Trent, scorer to be the finisher and off ball threat for whichever starter is anchoring the lineup, and b) as many wacky big 6'9" guys as they can manage - in other words, Otto, Boucher and Thad, more often than not.
I agree with thad, otto, and boucher being more essential for the system
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
Coach Thibs (I mean Nick) will have no issues playing our guys 40+ mpg. But the better scenario for all would be to see him reduce those minutes down to around 35mpg. Fred's injuries going into the playoffs were pretty bad, and likely due to wear and tear through all those hard minutes he played.
And so less staggering of those guys and more trust in Dalano and Malachi should be in order. If we don't trust those two kids, well then that's the way it goes. Just sucks that we didn't get some veteran playmaker to help us out in case they do suck this year.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View Post
I’m all for guys playing fewer minutes and the good news is we can easily do that by staggering guys. No need to go ten deep to reduce the load. So long as we are 8-9 deep instead of 6 deep like much of last year that’s a problem that should be easy to resolve.
The first 12 games of the season are going to be very difficult before the schedule eases up, i can see the top 6 getting heavy minutes to start the year.
Comment
-
Well the Lakers are signing Schroder for 1 year $2.4 million. My guess if the Raptors were in on it, they would have offered him a bit more for 1 year to shore up the bench unit. I don't think Schroder likes playing defense as he didn't do as well in the Celtics system but on the Lakers he can chuck away and hope some sucker team will pay him that big contract he turned away over a year ago.
Comment
-
Hotshot wrote: View PostWell the Lakers are signing Schroder for 1 year $2.4 million. My guess if the Raptors were in on it, they would have offered him a bit more for 1 year to shore up the bench unit. I don't think Schroder likes playing defense as he didn't do as well in the Celtics system but on the Lakers he can chuck away and hope some sucker team will pay him that big contract he turned away over a year ago.
I mean, there are still reasons one might go to the Lakers anyway, I suppose, but surely there were better spots on other teams for him if he was signing this contract with the goal of playing for his next contract?
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View Post
I’m all for guys playing fewer minutes and the good news is we can easily do that by staggering guys. No need to go ten deep to reduce the load. So long as we are 8-9 deep instead of 6 deep like much of last year that’s a problem that should be easy to resolve.
Knock on wood we have a healthier season then the last 2-3. Its a big reason why I have them #1 in the East since I have this feeling that the injury gods will be coming through for us this season.
Comment
-
TheWaterboy wrote: View Post
The Lakers are kind of an odd choice of landing spot for a player that's ostensibly a point guard or perhaps a combo guard, given that Lebron is going to be the primary ball-handler and initiator much/most of the time, and Westbrook will likely eat up a lot of minutes in the point guard/shooting guard role being ball dominant as well. (I don't think the Lakers will be able to trade him away, either.)
I mean, there are still reasons one might go to the Lakers anyway, I suppose, but surely there were better spots on other teams for him if he was signing this contract with the goal of playing for his next contract?
I suspect he feels he could get back to that level he was at in 2020-2021 by going back to the same team that once offered him $84M.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Hotshot wrote: View PostWell the Lakers are signing Schroder for 1 year $2.4 million. My guess if the Raptors were in on it, they would have offered him a bit more for 1 year to shore up the bench unit. I don't think Schroder likes playing defense as he didn't do as well in the Celtics system but on the Lakers he can chuck away and hope some sucker team will pay him that big contract he turned away over a year ago.
Mamba Mentality
Comment
Comment