bertarapsfan wrote:
View Post
I'm a little curious why you see 6th as wildly better than 7th to the point that you would have preferred an entirely different roster approach based on that difference alone. If the team is even within striking distance of 6th considering their starting point that should indicate they are performing like a home court team the rest of the way, which is exceedingly promising for next year. Assuming they don't, like, trade a core piece for whatever junk offers there are our there just for the sake of making a move.
Comment