Not sure how long ago you had the arguement with Grange Tom, but kudos to the mention again. 
It does open one's eyes a bit too and wonder.
Source - Click here

It does open one's eyes a bit too and wonder.

My overwhelming thought watching the Raptors somehow lose to Golden State the other day was this: Why didn’t the Raptors draft Stephen Curry?
It’s pretty clear on the strength of his play this year he’s going to be a very special player. Is he the bundle of athletic potential that Derrick Rose is? No. But neither is Steve Nash, and he gets by pretty well. Watching Curry live, that’s what came to mind. He’s nowhere near the ball-handler Nash is yet. And it’s probably a reach to suggest he’ll ever be quite the passer Nash has proven to be. But he plays with the same calm, focused intensity. He’s much quicker and more athletic than his jumping ability (above average, but not great spectacular) would lead people to believe. And my God can he shoot, which in the case of each player compliments everything they do, rather defines it. And plus he likes the city and his girlfriend’s family is from here.
The easy answer to the question is that the Raptors were picking ninth and Curry was taken seventh.
But I’m also curious why the Raptors didn’t draft Ricky Rubio (taken fifth)? Or even Tyreke Evans, who went fourth?
This is nothing against DeMar DeRozan exactly. He’s been just as advertised: A very athletic player with limited elite basketball experience who has at time shone in his first NBA season but more often has been kind of meh. He’s no Sonny Weems, in other words. He’s put in a lot of time on his game and will surely become the player he’s destined to be, it’s just yet to be determined what kind of player that is.
But wouldn’t the tone of the discussion right now be a little different if the Raptors had a rookie in the fold who not only was significant, game-changing talent, but quite likely a potential star?
Can we agree on that?
Which brings me to myself. A year ago the Raptors were on a winning streak, one that ended up with them finishing 9-4 in their last 13 games. What a waste.
This is what I wrote then in response to Tom Liston of Raptors Republic who – as a season ticket holder – objected to my argument then on the merits of tanking.
“Presuming the Raptors scouting staff would never get this wrong, they should get a better player picking 5th than 9th, or 8th than 9th, for that matter. And I guess my view is that if you're going to miss the playoffs or just make them and get crushed in the first round, better to pick fifth than 13th, or 16th. But hey, easy for me to say.”
It’s pretty clear on the strength of his play this year he’s going to be a very special player. Is he the bundle of athletic potential that Derrick Rose is? No. But neither is Steve Nash, and he gets by pretty well. Watching Curry live, that’s what came to mind. He’s nowhere near the ball-handler Nash is yet. And it’s probably a reach to suggest he’ll ever be quite the passer Nash has proven to be. But he plays with the same calm, focused intensity. He’s much quicker and more athletic than his jumping ability (above average, but not great spectacular) would lead people to believe. And my God can he shoot, which in the case of each player compliments everything they do, rather defines it. And plus he likes the city and his girlfriend’s family is from here.
The easy answer to the question is that the Raptors were picking ninth and Curry was taken seventh.
But I’m also curious why the Raptors didn’t draft Ricky Rubio (taken fifth)? Or even Tyreke Evans, who went fourth?
This is nothing against DeMar DeRozan exactly. He’s been just as advertised: A very athletic player with limited elite basketball experience who has at time shone in his first NBA season but more often has been kind of meh. He’s no Sonny Weems, in other words. He’s put in a lot of time on his game and will surely become the player he’s destined to be, it’s just yet to be determined what kind of player that is.
But wouldn’t the tone of the discussion right now be a little different if the Raptors had a rookie in the fold who not only was significant, game-changing talent, but quite likely a potential star?
Can we agree on that?
Which brings me to myself. A year ago the Raptors were on a winning streak, one that ended up with them finishing 9-4 in their last 13 games. What a waste.
This is what I wrote then in response to Tom Liston of Raptors Republic who – as a season ticket holder – objected to my argument then on the merits of tanking.
“Presuming the Raptors scouting staff would never get this wrong, they should get a better player picking 5th than 9th, or 8th than 9th, for that matter. And I guess my view is that if you're going to miss the playoffs or just make them and get crushed in the first round, better to pick fifth than 13th, or 16th. But hey, easy for me to say.”
Comment