3inthekeon wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything 2024 Draft
Collapse
X
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View Post
gradey has much higher upside than a role player though. You can see he has already flashed 3 level scoring potential and as long as he defends at an above averaege rate there is a lot of things he can do.
In terms of our front office and drafting. I am neutral. There are some bad ones and good ones. I think developmentally we have tried to get too many high ceiling low floor players who are out right... raw. I dont want raw players. Gradey is the highest skill floored prospect we have ever drafted.. how sad is that. That isn't shade against Gradey either ... instead its what we have focused on.. we thought we could teach anyone how to play but when the developmental run way has so long to go to get to a functional level you waste two years. Ryan dunn is a good example. He could be something great but he needs the right developmental situation to get it out of him because his offense is pretty subpar.
OG is an elite role player but realistically came in during a different era where the overall team was better giving you more runway to give guys shots...
we have drafted guys who don't have a ton of skill barnes included.If we knew half as much about coaching an NBA team as we think, we"d know twice as much as we do.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
3inthekeon wrote: View Post
lol. I'm 100% convinced you just made this up to make yourself seem like the smartest guy in the room in order to win your argument with Primer.
Comment
-
Primer wrote: View Post
If we get guys who stick in the league for 5+ years at every pick I'll be pleasantly surprised. If we get more than 1 starting caliber player I will be pleasantly surprised. If we don't keep our top 6 pick I don't think we'll get a starting caliber player out of this draft.
Comment
-
Great article on young Boban (2018) and why he can't get more minutes, despite being the most efficient scorer in the NBA. Sounds a lot like the Edey draft discussions, that are hot & heavy right now.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...-on-the-bench/
DETROIT — What if I told you that in today’s stats-obsessed league — where everything, including the arc of a shooter’s jump shot and the length of a player’s stride, can be spliced and measured — perhaps the most efficient scorer in modern NBA history couldn’t get off the bench most nights?
That’s the reality for 7-foot-3 Pistons center Boban Marjanovic, who scores with unprecedented efficiency when he is on the court.1 Among players who’ve averaged 30 points per 100 possessions and played in at least 100 regular-season games, no player has been able to match Marjanovic in points per shot attempt, and those who have come closest are either already in the Hall of Fame or likely will be one day. He also currently leads the NBA2 by a wide margin in points per touch, according to data from Second SpectrumStill, even with that sort of offensive firepower, the Heat — who drilled 17 threes, tied for the most Detroit’s allowed all season — were able to chase Boban off the floor whenever they downsized by playing Kelly Olynyk at center. In fact, Olynyk reeled off eight consecutive points to put Miami on an 8-0 run within two minutes of that shift; the run prompted Pistons coach Stan Van Gundy to call time and subsequently limit Marjanovic’s minutes to whenever Olynyk wasn’t playing at the 5.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View Post
gradey has much higher upside than a role player though. You can see he has already flashed 3 level scoring potential and as long as he defends at an above averaege rate there is a lot of things he can do.
In terms of our front office and drafting. I am neutral. There are some bad ones and good ones. I think developmentally we have tried to get too many high ceiling low floor players who are out right... raw. I dont want raw players. Gradey is the highest skill floored prospect we have ever drafted.. how sad is that. That isn't shade against Gradey either ... instead its what we have focused on.. we thought we could teach anyone how to play but when the developmental run way has so long to go to get to a functional level you waste two years. Ryan dunn is a good example. He could be something great but he needs the right developmental situation to get it out of him because his offense is pretty subpar.
OG is an elite role player but realistically came in during a different era where the overall team was better giving you more runway to give guys shots...
we have drafted guys who don't have a ton of skill barnes included.
Either way why can't there be a Gradey Dick type of talent in this draft? There are guys in this draft that flash 3 level scoring.
And what do you mean by not drafting any type of skill? What skills? You have to be pretty specific here. Like shooting? Dribbling? Passing? Rebounding? I mean what do you mean by skills? It's rare to find the perfect athlete.. and when you do they usually go #1 overalll.
Ryan Dunn is an elite defensive wing in college. Is he more than that? Who knows.. but he has skills. A guy averaging 3.5 stocks a game as a wing has skills. But because of his offense being limited it means he could end up as a second rounder. And that's a decision teams will make during the draft. Teams need to figure out what skills need priority over others.. and which kids show promise so that they can learn other skills.
We asked OG to guard the best player on the other team as a rookie and he took that challenge and got better at it. That's part of development. And it doesn't matter if the team was better or not. He could have been stapled to the bench. But Dwayne had him out there guarding Lebron in the playoffs.
Comment
-
golden wrote: View PostGreat article on young Boban (2018) and why he can't get more minutes, despite being the most efficient scorer in the NBA. Sounds a lot like the Edey draft discussions, that are hot & heavy right now.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...-on-the-bench/
Edey does not even fit in Darko's system where players constantly move around.
Is he suddenly going to change that style to accommodate a slow rookie?
Not a chance.
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
I'm glad you didn't say all-star or super star. I think we could easily draft a guy like Gary or Ochai in the 15-30 range in this draft. And those two are starting caliber players.
Comment
-
Primer wrote: View Post
It's certainly possible but odds are a lot lower this year than any other year.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
How do you know that? The top part of this draft is what's considered "weak". Not the entire draft class. I've watched some NCAA games. I've seen some draft profiles. Its the same as any other year. If you want to focus on who will be an all-star and only that, then yeah maybe be disappointed. But we're not doing that. We're talking about role players who can be starters. Lots of those in this draft.
I'll be disappointed if we don't get a top 6 pick this year, but not that disappointed because I'd love to have a pick next year.Last edited by Primer; Wed Apr 3, 2024, 04:49 PM.
Comment
-
Primer wrote: View Post
The whole class is weak, not just the top, top to bottom. Once again sticking your head in the sand and pretending this draft is just as good as any other. That's fine, we gotta cope with the fact we have lots of picks this year and admitting its a bad draft makes that a tough pill to swallow.
What makes it weak is that there are no sure fire #1 players. It's an interesting draft because guys are mocked all over and those mocks change constantly. But it's not really weak. Just different. And no I'm not just saying that because we have multiple picks. I'm saying that because I'm doing my homework.
There are at least 10-12 guys that I like and I have even done a deep, deep dive which I will do in May/June when we have an idea as to where we pick. There are some really good big men. Guys that can shoot. Some really good defenders. Good point guards. It's lacking in wings. And there are no big stars potentially. But the class is pretty deep. Teams in the playoffs will likely get a good player out of this draft as guys slip and fall.
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
How do you know that? The top part of this draft is what's considered "weak". Not the entire draft class. I've watched some NCAA games. I've seen some draft profiles. Its the same as any other year. If you want to focus on who will be an all-star and only that, then yeah maybe be disappointed. But we're not doing that. We're talking about role players who can be starters. Lots of those in this draft.If we knew half as much about coaching an NBA team as we think, we"d know twice as much as we do.
- 1 like
Comment
-
3inthekeon wrote: View Post
Thank you. Reporters post hot takes on the weakest draft. Having the least chance at star power at the top makes no difference for most teams. Utah didn't trade for that late 20's pick to get a career G-leaguer.
Comment
Comment