TrueTorontoFan wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
dwayne Wade
Collapse
X
-
mcHAPPY wrote: View PostThe only risk with JV is he signs QO and pulls a Monroe/Ben Gordon.....even that gives him 2 more years though.
But I don't see that as likely considering he had to pay his own hefty buyout to leave Lithuania team and it is his first big nba contract.
Comment
-
Primer wrote: View PostMonroe only signed the QO because Detroit wouldn't offer him enough, and other teams wouldn't either. That won't be the case with JV. I see us resigning him for around $18M, which is roughly equivalent to what Vucevic got from Orlando when increased to reflect the new cap.9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
KeonClark wrote: View PostVucevic is so much better than JV though. I dunno that just seems like such a ridiculous number I understand the cap is going up but its so hard to stomach that JV is worth that kind of money at this point in his career.
Comment
-
Wade is a pipe dream for Toronto, he's not leaving Miami, this is probably all part of strategy for his contract negotiations...if he really can't work it out with Miami only team I see him going to is his hometown Chicago like last season. Butler gets moved to SF and Wade steps into SG. Chi town is looking to move one of their big 4 big men (likely Taj Gibson) so with some slick GM moves they could make it work.
Comment
-
-
JWash wrote: View PostNo it won't be.
In 2016 the cap is projected to increase to 89M, assuming nothing changes the max for a player with JV's experience is 25% of the cap. Meaning he'd be able to make a deal starting at 22M.
For the record, I'm of the belief that if we have to max Jonas we should (not sure about DeRozan his max is higher, closer to 24-25M).
JV's max will be ~19.5M, under 20M.
Comment
-
Bonus Jonas wrote: View PostMy mistake, my scales were wrong. It's not 17M but it's also not 22M. The max scale isn't actually 25, 30 and 35 percent, those are rough figures.
JV's max will be ~19.5M, under 20M.
The projected cap is $89M, 25% of that is 22.25M. Is there some kind of exception or rule that prevents him (and others) from getting the full 25%?
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View PostNot saying you're wrong, but why is it 19.5M?
The projected cap is $89M, 25% of that is 22.25M. Is there some kind of exception or rule that prevents him (and others) from getting the full 25%?
They use a different cap calculation to determine the maximum salaries, which is based on 42.14% of projected BRI rather than 44.74%. In 2005 the sides negotiated a different formula for setting the salary cap but not maximum salaries, so the two became decoupled, and this continued in the 2011 agreement. For this reason the maximum salaries are not actually 25%, 30% or 35% of the cap, and instead are a slightly lower amount. For example, even though the salary cap for 2011-12 is $58.044 million and 25% of this amount is $14.511 million, the 0-6 year maximum salary is actually $12,922,194. In addition, for 2012-13 a 5.8% increase in maximum salaries was agreed to, even though the salary cap stayed the same as 2011-12.
Comment
Comment