Chr1s1anL wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Looking Ahead: 2016 Free Agency
Collapse
X
-
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostI wouldn't be surprised. He signed a 9.5 mil deal while all his peers were geting 12 mil.
almost everyone was crucifying Colangelo for that contract at the time. Derozan was, quite frankly, not actually a very good player when he signed that deal.
Stop making up bullshit
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostYeah, they all got more money than him. That's why I wouldn't be surprised if he took a discount.
He was a high-volume chucker, and not a good one. So his contract was entirely on upside. Which he mostly fulfilled this year, to his credit. But he didn't have a great resume when he signed that extension. Now he has 2 All-Star teams to his credit and a much better resume.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
KHD wrote: View Postholy shit, this isn't even remotely true.
almost everyone was crucifying Colangelo for that contract at the time. Derozan was, quite frankly, not actually a very good player when he signed that deal.
Stop making up bullshit@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostBrandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, Steph(couldn't stay on the court) etc.
Comment
-
By PER and WS/48, this is the list of DeMar's comparables from 2011/12, the year before his extension:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...t=&order_by=wstwitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostDeMar was also a long way from an All-Star at that point. The season before his extension he had a 12.8 PER and .054 WS/48 on 25% usage.
He was a high-volume chucker, and not a good one. So his contract was entirely on upside. Which he mostly fulfilled this year, to his credit. But he didn't have a great resume when he signed that extension. Now he has 2 All-Star teams to his credit and a much better resume.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
I don't know why everyone is getting upset about me agreeing that DD could take a discount? Doesn't seem like a guy that cares all that much about money. Not saying he'll sign for less than 20 mill but, would I be surprised if he left a couple mill on the table? No.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostThey all signed extensions based on potential. Second contract your paying for what a player might do.
2011 numbers for all:
DeMar: 16/3/2 on 42/26/81 shooting splits, -8 net rating, 12.8 PER, .054 WS/48
Curry: 14/3/6 on 49/45/80 shooting splits, +4 net rating, 21.2 PER, .144 WS/48
Jennings: 19/3/5 on 41/33/80 shooting splits, -1 net rating, 18.4 PER, .114 WS/48
Lawson: 16/3/6 on 48/36/82 shooting splits, +8 net rating, 19.4 PER, .157 WS/48
They weren't comparable!
The other guys were already really good players.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostThey all signed extensions based on potential. Second contract your paying for what a player might do.
he worked very hard to prevent his contract from being another Bargnani extension.
Comment
-
Player value seems to be assessed like real estate. When a house on your street goes for x amount of dollars, all the houses on the same street are valued around the same. Doesn't matter which ones are renovated and which ones a dump.
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostI don't know why everyone is getting upset about me agreeing that DD could take a discount? Doesn't seem like a guy that cares all that much about money. Not saying he'll sign for less than 20 mill but, would I be surprised if he left a couple mill on the table? No.
Comment
Comment