Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Everything Jamal Murray

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Snooch wrote: View Post
    That is inredibly competetive.

    Add in the return from trades....

    I still think demar and ppat for mirotic and noah and ride that till deadline....of course casey fired as well

    Lowry\wright
    Joseph\ross\powell
    Carroll\jj\bruno
    Mirotic\scola
    Jv\noah\biyombo
    So you actually are advocating starting CoJo at SG? Ugh.


    Aside from that glaring problem, we have no chance to prying Noah AND Mirotic away from Chicago. Especially not with a package of Demar and PP.

    Its so weird, but those who criticize Demar on a daily basis seem to think he has far more value on the trade market and in Free Agency than those who actually support him. I don't understand it. You guys completely shit on the guy every opportunity you get, and then go on to suggest he will be given multiple Max Offers by all these GMs who are salivating over a "low efficiency ball hog", or that GMs will trade their top Prospects and Vets away for him. I don't get it.

    Comment


    • #77
      Joey wrote: View Post
      So you actually are advocating starting CoJo at SG? Ugh.


      Aside from that glaring problem, we have no chance to prying Noah AND Mirotic away from Chicago. Especially not with a package of Demar and PP.

      Its so weird, but those who criticize Demar on a daily basis seem to think he has far more value on the trade market and in Free Agency than those who actually support him. I don't understand it. You guys completely shit on the guy every opportunity you get, and then go on to suggest he will be given multiple Max Offers by all these GMs who are salivating over a "low efficiency ball hog", or that GMs will trade their top Prospects and Vets away for him. I don't get it.
      Chicago hardly plays Noah, and noah is unhappy about it.

      And mirotics numbers have consistantly been dropping...as has his minutes...as has his role, which now has been relegated to spot up 3 point shooter(27% from three and 77% of his shots coming of NO dribbles) A quick google search will show you there is alot of doubt right now with Mirotic in Chicago.

      And there has been talks in Chicago that Taj should be starting with Pau, as Gibson has looked like he is regaining his old self.

      noah is not part of Chicagos plans anymore, is hurt...alot... and doesnt get much burn.


      Add to that, Chicago has been looking for consistant wing help for a while now, as Butler has been shouldering the entire load for a while now, Butler or Demar could easily switch to sf and Chicago has its wing scoring. Patterson spreads the floor off the bench for them.


      And the duo of Joseph and Lowry is temporary, but so far this season has performed admirably.

      Comment


      • #78
        Snooch wrote: View Post
        Chicago hardly plays Noah, and noah is unhappy about it.

        And mirotics numbers have consistantly been dropping...as has his minutes...as has his role, which now has been relegated to spot up 3 point shooter(27% from three and 77% of his shots coming of NO dribbles) A quick google search will show you there is alot of doubt right now with Mirotic in Chicago.

        And there has been talks in Chicago that Taj should be starting with Pau, as Gibson has looked like he is regaining his old self.

        noah is not part of Chicagos plans anymore, is hurt...alot... and doesnt get much burn.


        Add to that, Chicago has been looking for consistant wing help for a while now, as Butler has been shouldering the entire load for a while now, Butler or Demar could easily switch to sf and Chicago has its wing scoring. Patterson spreads the floor off the bench for them.


        And the duo of Joseph and Lowry is temporary, but so far this season has performed admirably.
        Wouldnt mind Noah but dont think it would cost Demar to get him

        Comment


        • #79
          2 nba games on the dish but I will be checking Jamal out prior to our wounded raps taking on laker's

          Comment


          • #80
            and this what to do with Murray?

            Comment


            • #81
              Snooch wrote: View Post
              Chicqgo has been wanting another wing for a while now

              Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk
              McBuckets is $19M per year cheaper than Derozan and spreads the floor. They have zero need for Derozan.

              Comment


              • #82
                Superjudge wrote: View Post
                and this what to do with Murray?
                Nothing.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Frick missed the game how did Jamal look tonight?

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    rightsideup wrote: View Post
                    Frick missed the game how did Jamal look tonight?
                    Tyler Ulis dominates the ball, so Murray looks so-so in UK's offense. He's playing off-ball, but is at his best with the ball in his hands, ala Steph Curry / Brandon Roy. Hopefully, that will cause his draft stock to drop.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      golden wrote: View Post
                      Tyler Ulis dominates the ball, so Murray looks so-so in UK's offense. He's playing off-ball, but is at his best with the ball in his hands, ala Steph Curry / Brandon Roy. Hopefully, that will cause his draft stock to drop.
                      thanks in the Duke game he shared the ballhandling duties and a course filled the stat sheet.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        rightsideup wrote: View Post
                        Frick missed the game how did Jamal look tonight?
                        13pts, 6 reb, 1 ast. Only got 4 FG attempts, but went a perfect 10-10 from the line.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Coach Cal is not afraid to bench Jamal

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            octothorp wrote: View Post
                            We also potentially have two first-rounders next year, so we can add a future first-rounder to the mix as well. Although it's complicated, because we can't trade away all our first-rounders next year. So the best draft pick package we could offer is the NYK/Denver 2016 pick, our own 2016 pick, whichever is higher of our pick or the Clippers 2017 pick or the rights to the Clippers pick if Clippers miss the playoffs in 2017. Add in a prospect or two (Delon Wright probably has no place going forward on the team if we're targetting Murray) and that's a package that a lot of high lottery teams would need to take seriously. But it is so all-in that there's a significant risk there.
                            This isn't to agree or disagree with the plan, but thought I would add that it is possible for Raptors to trade both 2016 picks (Raps and Nugs/Knicks) and both 2017 picks (Raps and Clips). It would just need to be done on during the draft.

                            For example, let's say we get the Knicks pick at 10 and Raptors are picking at their traditional 18, with a plan an agreement to trade to 7 with (for sake of argument) Denver.

                            Denver would make their pick on behalf of the Raptors. Raptors would then pick 10 and 20 on behalf of Denver. As soon as Raptors use their selection at 10, they have fulfilled their draft requirement for the year and can then include both 2017 picks.

                            The rule only looks forward. As soon as Raptors make a 2016 pick, they could trade all four picks.
                            http://twitter.com/m_shantz

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Shantz wrote: View Post
                              This isn't to agree or disagree with the plan, but thought I would add that it is possible for Raptors to trade both 2016 picks (Raps and Nugs/Knicks) and both 2017 picks (Raps and Clips). It would just need to be done on during the draft.

                              For example, let's say we get the Knicks pick at 10 and Raptors are picking at their traditional 18, with a plan an agreement to trade to 7 with (for sake of argument) Denver.

                              Denver would make their pick on behalf of the Raptors. Raptors would then pick 10 and 20 on behalf of Denver. As soon as Raptors use their selection at 10, they have fulfilled their draft requirement for the year and can then include both 2017 picks.

                              The rule only looks forward. As soon as Raptors make a 2016 pick, they could trade all four picks.
                              Too complicated. Just wait 7-8 years like Wiggins. It barely a decade

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                33 points and 7 3's yesterday. Nice to see him doing well.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X