Eliza wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game #34: Toronto Raptors 104 - Charlotte Hornets 94
Collapse
X
-
-
mcHAPPY wrote: View PostThat is a perfect example of the danger of the whole "all these NBA coaches know best"
How many people were on these boards last year begging and pleading for a shift in defensive philosophy - yet Casey continued to pound that rock.
Well well well...... Who knew?
MU moved out some of the shittiest defenders(Vasquez, Lou, Hans), but also allowed the best and most effective hedger to leave (Amir). Also brought in a terrific defender, but a poor hedger in Biz.If we knew half as much about coaching an NBA team as we think, we"d know twice as much as we do.
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostIt's on individual possession basis - so the offensive efficiency numbers are how many points scored per 100 offensive possessions, while the defensive efficiency is per 100 defensive possessions. Net rating is the difference. So if you played one offensive possession and scored 2 points (200 ORTG) and played 100 defensive possessions and allowed 2 points (2 DRTG), your net rating would not be based on 2 points scored minus 2 points allowed equals 0, it would be 200 - 2 = 198 net rating. So, short answer, no, defence-offence subs would not impact the numbers.
In any case, those sorts of subs make up maybe 3 or 4 possessions in a game, and most games they aren't even made, and on a scale of 75 or so minutes played (or more for BB) you are looking at about 150 possessions played (each way), so even if subs worked like that it would be an error on the scale of 1 or 2 %. But they don't anyway.
That's also why net rating is a far superior statistic to simple plus-minus. Plus minus will penalize players who play more defensive possessions than offensive ones (based on regular sub patterns and of course offence-defence subs at the end of games). Net rating takes the ratio of possession types out of the equation and just presents the difference in value provided on each end.There's no such thing as a 2nd round bust.
- TGO
Comment
-
JV vs. BB is going to make the forums insufferable for the entire season."Stop eating your sushi."
"I do actually have a pair of Uggs."
"I've had three cups of green tea tonight. I'm wired. I'm absolutely wired."
- Jack Armstrong
Comment
-
3inthekeon wrote: View PostHow much of the issue was system and how much the players?
MU moved out some of the shittiest defenders(Vasquez, Lou, Hans), but also allowed the best and most effective hedger to leave (Amir). Also brought in a terrific defender, but a poor hedger in Biz.
They were one of worst defensive teams in the league coaches by a defensive guru who refused to adapt....and was adamnent, steadfast, and defiant to criticism throughout the entire season, playoffs, and post season presser.
I'm not sure how much more telling it can be that the bloggers view was more inline with reality.
Comment
-
-
-
thead wrote: View Postyeah BB is playing himself into a 5 - 8 million dollar deal (the new 3 to 5 as it were) and Bebe still has two years on the rook scale.
Comment
-
mcHAPPY wrote: View PostThe players and the system changed.
They were one of worst defensive teams in the league coaches by a defensive guru who refused to adapt....and was adamnent, steadfast, and defiant to criticism throughout the entire season, playoffs, and post season presser.
I'm not sure how much more telling it can be that the bloggers view was more inline with reality.If we knew half as much about coaching an NBA team as we think, we"d know twice as much as we do.
Comment
-
3inthekeon wrote: View PostNo system would have worked last year when we had the worst perimeter defenders in the NBA.
When Vasquez was off the court last season, the team had a 104.9 DRTG. With Lou on the bench, a 105.1 DRTG. These are not good numbers. Methinks your blame is misplaced. The system was absolute garbage.
Comment
Comment