I expect Masai to offer him the full max, if for no other reason than that if he doesn't, and LA comes in with a full max and the offer of filling Kobe's shoes, DeMar could feel insulted that we didn't extend the same.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Think Again: Would You Give DeMar $22M+ for 5 years?
Collapse
X
-
Yeah, 5/125 is probably what you hope for. Whether that is 25 flat or 22 with max raises (actually comes in at 126), not really important. If we are giving him a PO, I'd prefer the backloaded deal (to incentivize him opting in, or maximize savings if he opts out). But either way, you probably aren't getting him for less than 125M total guarantee.
I do disagree about the construct of the question though - I'd prefer if you just put yes or no, as I voted yes but not even remotely for the reason attached to yes.
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostI expect Masai to offer him the full max, if for no other reason than that if he doesn't, and LA comes in with a full max and the offer of filling Kobe's shoes, DeMar could feel insulted that we didn't extend the same.
But I was impressed with DanH's discussion of a $25M starting figure massaged over 5 years, to match other GM's potential 4-year offers, while saving some $ and scaling for future flexibility.
But I think it's obvious that the RR membership has changed its view ... and I was getting awfully tired of looking at the former poll results. Misleading, now ...Last edited by Wild-ling#1; Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:47 PM.
Comment
-
I don't want DeRo back.
As much as people don't claim this, Casey's contract will continue to exist as long as DeRozan's around. Our offense is built for him to put up the best numbers possible, and he's done that.
Letting DD go allows us to get other key FA's at SG or draft a SG whose NBA-ready with the NYK/DEN pick.Axel wrote:Now Cody can stop posting about this guy and we have a poster to blame if anything goes wrong!!KeonClark wrote:We won't hear back from him. He dissapears into thin air and reappears when you least expect it. Ten is an enigma. Ten is a legend. Ten for the motherfucking win.KeonClark wrote:I can't wait until the playoffs start.
Until then, opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one and they most often stink
Comment
-
-
KHD wrote: View PostI imagine the PA has a bigger issue with guys like David West leaving $12M in one season on the table. It's the mid-range guys who are most affected by and have the most effect on that kind of thing, not the stars.
I know that the MLB pa has been quite open about this stance and they are the gold standard which all sports unions seek to aspire to.
Comment
-
Wild-ling#1 wrote: View PostA few of us have asked for this: So here it is ...
I picked a figure of $22M+ to go over the original poll number, but reflect the desire for some sort of discount (in exchange for a 5th year ... of pure DeRozan growth and bliss! )
Comment
-
Bendit wrote: View PostI beg to differ. What West did has been going on for a while now...chasing a ring at the end of their careers at the vet minimum. Understandable and short term. It is precisely the "star" f/a signing that they would be concerned about (on the discounting) since that sets a bench mark number for others.
I know that the MLB pa has been quite open about this stance and they are the gold standard which all sports unions seek to aspire to.
The stars will get the max, regardless, unless they want to take a discount to sign other players.
I see no evidence that superstar contracts have set any benchmark for average players.
On the other hand, when guys like West, who have lots to offer still, take the minimum, it's one less spot for Joe AveragePlayer to earn his league average contract.
The players union's "ideal outcome" theoretically would be for every player to be earning the same salary, and that it be as high as possible.Last edited by KHD; Thu Jan 21, 2016, 04:20 PM.
Comment
-
KHD wrote: View PostI don't really think that's true.
The stars will get the max, regardless, unless they want to take a discount to sign other players.
I see no evidence that superstar contracts have set any benchmark for average players.
On the other hand, when guys like West, who have lots to offer still, take the minimum, it's one less spot for Joe AveragePlayer to earn his league average contract.
The players union's "ideal outcome" theoretically would be for every player to be earning the same salary, and that it be as high as possible.
Comment
Comment