Also I hope you guys are right about us not being that bad statistically in tight close games because the eye test to me is saying something completely different.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game #52: Toronto Raptors 112 - Minnesota Timberwolves 117
Collapse
X
-
Barolt wrote: View PostI've been arguing for more than a month that the best place to use JV at this point is at the elbow, and he should get more touches there. Perfect place for him to make passes to DeMar/Ross/DeMarre on back cuts, or punish the defense if they sag off him, or initiate a set for a 3pt shot.I relish negativity and disappointment. It is not healthy. Somebody buy me a pony.
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostI've been arguing for more than a month that the best place to use JV at this point is at the elbow, and he should get more touches there. Perfect place for him to make passes to DeMar/Ross/DeMarre on back cuts, or punish the defense if they sag off him, or initiate a set for a 3pt shot.Two beer away from being two beers away.
Comment
-
breakin_ankles wrote: View PostAlso ignoring the fact that the pieces we would he required to send would completely change the team that is currently 2nd in the east. Most likely completely depleting our most useful asset, the bench.
Regardless, this roster needs to be improved somehow/some way if we really want to make any noise come April.
Comment
-
-
-
Mess wrote: View PostAnd that's not possible right now? Or you'd like it to be a certainty as if such a thing were possible?
All we're dealing with are probabilities, and I'd like to increase said probabilities of being one of the last 4 teams standing.
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostLike S.R. mentioned, I think Horford is the type of talent that could have a meaningful impact on this team's ability to "contend" (ignoring the risk associated with acquiring a free agent to be).
Losing JV to get Horford significantly reduces the gains, and might not push us that far, AND narrows the window for our core. The whole point of getting Horford is to play him at PF beside JV.
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostHorford is the type of talent that if we added him to our current core of DD, KL, DC and JV, we could significantly improve our ability to contend.
Losing JV to get Horford significantly reduces the gains, and might not push us that far, AND narrows the window for our core. The whole point of getting Horford is to play him at PF beside JV.
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostI don't disagree. If there's a way to get Horford while keeping DeRozan, Lowry and Jonas in tact, I'm all for it. But that seems like a pipe dream.
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostYeah, well what I'm saying is you don't trade for an expiring contract on the hope he re-signs and at the cost of several major assets unless you are achieving a pipe dream.
Comment
Comment