Barolt wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game 58 - Toronto Raptors 101 - Detroit Pistons 114
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Barolt wrote: View PostOur current starting lineup struggles against all matchups. So the only way to find out if we can improve on it, is to try something different.
Comment
-
Demographic Shift wrote: View PostNot being a full fledged Hinkiebot but does the data suggest at a cursory glance that possibly the mix of the other 4 guys on the floor with Scola have some impact on how things go as well ? That its just not one guy out of 5 ?
Comment
-
tDotted wrote: View PostSO! It looks like Scola is only a positive playing with the bench players (as seen by the lineup of Ross and Bismack). Hmm... maybe we could just bring the whole bench unit into the starting lineup every night. That way Scola can actually produce like an NBA player! #StartScola82GamesNoMatterWhat
Comment
-
ogi wrote: View PostBut that lineup features both Lowry and Derozan. Also without the date restrictions this lineup has a slight net negative ratingtwitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
tDotted wrote: View PostSO! It looks like Scola is only a positive playing with the bench players (as seen by the lineup of Ross and Bismack). Hmm... maybe we could just bring the whole bench unit into the starting lineup every night. That way Scola can actually produce like an NBA player! #StartScola82GamesNoMatterWhat
Comment
-
-
Barolt wrote: View PostSo the question is... if putting Ross and Patterson in the starting lineup makes our starting lineup better than the Lowry+Bench group, what's the excuse for Scola and JJ starting?
Every team needs a sixth man, and Ross is that sixth man for us.
Comment
-
A.I wrote: View PostI'm okay with keeping JJ in the starting lineup. If you add Patterson and Ross, our bench will become total crap.
Every team needs a sixth man, and Ross is that sixth man for us.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
CNinja26 wrote: View PostI refuse to believe that the fan base is smarter than the collective Raptors staff. People can throw around stats, but that doesn't make anyone experts like the... actual experts.
I'm fairly certain the Raptors staff have a very comprehensive understanding of all the numbers thrown around and make their decisions in spite of them. Why? Not everything comes down to numbers. Managing a team of players is far more complex and dynamic than what +/- or advanced stats say. They're in the business of W's and L's, yes (which looks damn good at the moment). They're also in the business of managing men with egos, psyches, personalities, families, ambitions, interpersonal relationships and a plethora of things that aren't measured in the NBA.com stats tab.
I'm not saying the numbers can't tell a story, nor that people here can't criticize or give their two cents on what the Raptors staff should do, or how this team can be better on paper. I mostly get annoyed when I hear regular joes who watch a game and read a few articles and manipulate a few stat lines show complete disregard for and insult a man who has spent his entire life doing one thing: basketball. Believe me, Casey knows more than we do, whether we like to admit it or not.
So I'm actually going to side with Democratic Shift on this subject matter.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostVery well put. If we know as much as Casey we wouldn't be posting on here.
They aren't infallible.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Comment