Chr1s1anL wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game 59 - Utah Jazz 94 - Toronto Raptors 104
Collapse
X
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostYour wrong. He was good for us at the beginning of the year. +/- does not define good basketball. There's more to the game than stats.
Because, ignoring +/-, even when Scola's been good ... the team's been better without him on the court. Something that is also visibly seen with the eye test. Yes, there's more to basketball then +/- ... but by literally [almost] every empirical measure as well as the eye test, Scola hasn't been good.
Is he a bad player? Absolutely not. Is he being placed in a role that people have been saying would be a bad fit for him since the pre-season? Yes.Last edited by Just Is; Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:58 PM."My biggest concern as a coach is to not confuse winning with progress." - Steve Kerr
"If it's unacceptable in defeat, it's unacceptable in victory." - Jeff Van Gundy
Comment
-
Just Is wrote: View PostJust out of curiousity; what measurement should be used?
Because, ignoring +/-, even when Scola's been good ... the team's been better with him on the court. Something that is also visibly seen with the eye test. Yes, there's more to basketball then +/- ... but by literally [almost] every empirical measure as well as the eye test, Scola hasn't been good.
Is he a bad player? Absolutely not. Is he being placed in a role that people have been saying would be a bad fit for him since the pre-season? Yes.
So Scola's bad stats don't matter, but Patterson's bad stats TOTALLY matter.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View PostI don't have them in the finals personally. Idk why, no logic just a gut feeling but I think they're going to choke.
I'm taking the field.9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
-
JWash wrote: View PostI don't have them in the finals personally. Idk why, no logic just a gut feeling but I think they're going to choke.
I'm taking the field.9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
-
-
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostCause everybody here has the platform to talk about pro coaching? Do we have some retired pro coaches that post here?9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
KeonClark wrote: View PostDo you have to be an nba player to talk about the players? Do you have to be a professional rapper to comment on a drake or eminem album? Do you have to be to a politician to give your view on Trudeau?If we knew half as much about coaching an NBA team as we think, we"d know twice as much as we do.
Comment
-
-
KeonClark wrote: View PostNo because you have to at least have a basic understanding of those examples I mentioned to comment on themIf we knew half as much about coaching an NBA team as we think, we"d know twice as much as we do.
Comment
Comment