slaw wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything VanVleet
Collapse
X
-
-
A.I wrote: View Post
The fortunate part was winning a championship in the first year of Kawhi, but stars get traded fairly often. Its also rare for a star to bolt after winning a championship.
The Raptors' philosophy of developing and winning while retaining assets worked perfectly for Kawhi because they still had a good enough team to win a title with Kawhi.
Raps currently have assets, but unfortunately the developing players and winning has been lacking.
Comment
-
golden wrote: View Post
In hindsight, the Raptors had the perfect excuse to go into that rebuild cycle.... one micro-second after Kawhi left. The smart move would have been to sell high on Ibaka, Gasol & Lowry while the championship glow was the brightest. And maybe Danny Green (if a sign & trade scenario was available which also benefited the Lakers). I will also add selling high on Fred to that list, even though he was a young player.
- 1 like
Comment
-
slaw wrote: View Post
All organizations go up and down. It’s cyclical. Spurs were at the top for a long time now they suck. This is every North American sports organization with very few exceptions (Yankees and…. that’s about it.) Winning it all takes an incredible amount of good fortune. Even amazing teams have very short timelines 3-5 years) and they are done. The odd dynasty is the result of a generational player but once he is gone (Brady, Gretzky, Jordan) those teams fade back to the pack. Not sure why you think Toronto would be or should be the Yankees of the NBA.
I don't necessarily want the Raptors to be the Yankees of the NBA.
I just don't want them to be the Minnesota Timberwolves or the Cavs sans lebron and I think that's where we're heading. Without that one magical season, that's more what we've been (if you're counting ECF's or Chips as the goal) not just a winning organization, which they've been recently.
Comment
-
G__Deane wrote: View Post
You got the point exactly backwards
I don't necessarily want the Raptors to be the Yankees of the NBA.
I just don't want them to be the Minnesota Timberwolves or the Cavs sans lebron and I think that's where we're heading. Without that one magical season, that's more what we've been (if you're counting ECF's or Chips as the goal) not just a winning organization, which they've been recently.
Like, you're worried about the organization now? The 2022 Raptors look like the 80s Lakers compared to the 1995-2013 Raptors.
- 3 likes
Comment
-
golden wrote: View Post
In hindsight, the Raptors had the perfect excuse to go into that rebuild cycle.... one micro-second after Kawhi left. The smart move would have been to sell high on Ibaka, Gasol & Lowry while the championship glow was the brightest. And maybe Danny Green (if a sign & trade scenario was available which also benefited the Lakers). I will also add selling high on Fred to that list, even though he was a young player.
It was the right call to go for it.. that team still was great.
- 3 likes
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
That 2020 team without Kawhi was a contender.. and unfortunately they ran into a pandemic. Pascal turned into a shell of what he was earlier in the year. Gasol got really old. And we lost home court advantage. Still got to the second round easily and made it interesting, despite being down 3-0.
It was the right call to go for it.. that team still was great.
And no, Pascal would never have been able to carry that team.
Comment
-
Jclaw wrote: View Post
I'll be definitely praying 2 lord 2 get rid Of Nameless 23...every night until his bum a#@ is gone.."Never apologize for coming to me. Office hours are for patients.
My kitchen is always open to friends"
Comment
-
Kagemusha wrote: View Post
Every team was affected by the pandemic, not just the Raptors, not just Pascal.
And no, Pascal would never have been able to carry that team.
You are maybe misremembering how good that 2020 team was. Our bench was awesome that year.
Comment
-
Kagemusha wrote: View Post
Every team was affected by the pandemic, not just the Raptors, not just Pascal.
And no, Pascal would never have been able to carry that team.
It affected players in different ways. Whatever PG and Pascal went through mentally, then you had Murray and Mitchell averaging 40 while playing without a crowd. Nuggets also made two 3-1 comebacks. It was a weird time.Last edited by A.I; Wed Jan 4, 2023, 08:43 PM.
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
I don't really agree. We played the Lakers well in the regular season. Heat weren't that great. Celtics were tough and if we had home court we would have beaten them. The toughest team would have been the Bucks. They lost to the Heat in the bubble. Maybe that doesn't happen outside a bubble. But we would have had a good game plan for Giannis again.
You are maybe misremembering how good that 2020 team was. Our bench was awesome that year.
Pascal was never that guy, especially at that point in his career, and even up to now.
We all know that a deep bench is useful in the regular season, it shortens significantly in the playoffs.
Comment
-
Kagemusha wrote: View Post
My point is that if we are thinking that Pascal would be THE guy that replaced Kawhi, and who would have been tasked to carry the team the way Kawhi did, then we are seriously over valuing him.
Pascal was never that guy, especially at that point in his career, and even up to now.
We all know that a deep bench is useful in the regular season, it shortens significantly in the playoffs.
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
That team was more about the sum of its parts.. like the 2004 Pistons. The East was there for the taking. Tatum and Giannis still didn't have "it". And Butler was the lone guy in Miami with up and comers in Bam and Herro. No super teams except out West with the Lakers. Warriors were a lottery team that year too.
Comment
Comment