Chr1s1anL wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything Trade Chatter
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Jclaw wrote: View PostI've said this before but I keep hearing the same thing come up. In an article by E Koreen the other day. On the radio with James Herbert. "We may be targeting a certain free agent but we can't compete with the riches the Celtics can offer". But we are looking for a PF and the Celtics are looking for every position except for that (and maybe PG). I don't think whatever guy we are looking for would play alongside Horford. That should take them out of the bidding. Am I wrong?
Comment
-
slaw wrote: View PostCause you want to see a lot of Jakob Poeltl? Cause you're only getting Noel when he's healthy which is about once every three years...
Also, we've seen a lot of discussion around jvs struggles attributed to injury as a possible reason.
Comment
-
lewro wrote: View PostI will also just add to this that we have no guarantee than jv doesn't go down for the season or playoffs at any point. We could be in the muck of .500 teams vying for #8
Also, we've seen a lot of discussion around jvs struggles attributed to injury as a possible reason.
Comment
-
KHD wrote: View Postso? we have no guarantee that lowry won't go down either. we don't and can't have fail-safes for everything. this is the nba, not a nuclear power plant.
Bebe is 25 games out of the dleague, yak should in the dleague and we don't know what we have in Sully.
You prefer to have fvv and delon filling roster spots on the bench? We've got Bruno for that.
There's no need to be over dramatic about power plants. We can have a mature discussion about hypothetical possibilities without over reacting.
Comment
-
lewro wrote: View PostWe are 4 deep at that position.
Bebe is 25 games out of the dleague, yak should in the dleague and we don't know what we have in Sully.
You prefer to have fvv and delon filling roster spots on the bench? We've got Bruno for that.
There's no need to be over dramatic about power plants. We can have a mature discussion about hypothetical possibilities without over reacting.
my point was that "JV might have a season ending injury" is not an argument that holds water, because we would be just as, or more, screwed if someone like Demar or Lowry had one. reality of the NBA, if you lose a key guy you lose a season, basically.
If anything we're more thin at the 4-spot and therefore should be acquiring depth there.
Comment
-
KHD wrote: View Postwho is overreacting?
my point was that "JV might have a season ending injury" is not an argument that holds water, because we would be just as, or more, screwed if someone like Demar or Lowry had one. reality of the NBA, if you lose a key guy you lose a season, basically.
If anything we're more thin at the 4-spot and therefore should be acquiring depth there.
Yes, we are thin at the 4. Open to talking about it, not a nuclear explosion.
Yes, we'd be in trouble to lose Kyle and demar. Jv is not our 1,2. We could still be #2 seed with noel and no jv imo. Good teams like gsw are rumoured to noel bc it can help get you over the hump.
For some here, it seems there is a consideration as potentially more than just a depth move, it potentially could allow us to take a step forward and i think that's really what bothers the JV fanboys. Personally, I'd consider the depth to have more weapons bc we need it and still have plenty of assets to address the 4, if and when one becomes available. Nothing on market atm. Been looking for 2 yrs. In the unlikely event a deal is made, id watch them play to make up my mind.
Comment
Comment