Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How do we fix our defense?
Collapse
X
-
Lupe wrote: View PostRight now our best lineup that plays a lot of minutes every game is our starters with Siakam swapped out for 2Pat so Lowry-DeMar-Carroll-2Pat-Valanciunas. +33.4 netRTG, 3 points higher than the Lowry+Bench unit.
However when you swap out JV for Bebe and Carroll for Powell you get a +69.9 netRTG.
Also our starters with JV replaced for Bebe (Lowry-DD-Carroll-Siakam-Bebe) have a +41.8 netRTG.
Pretty hard to say those latter two units aren't "playing against starters", and they have the highest netRTGs of our 11 most used lineups. Small sample size at this point in the season though.
The fact they've been used so little is also commentary on what Casey thinks - he clearly recognizes he is better off with Pat than Siakam (same for Scola last year) which is why Pat gets such a huge sample of minutes with the starters even when he doesn't start. Can't say the same for BeBe - even Casey recognizes that he's better off playing JV against starters, so he doesn't give BeBe many minutes with the starting or closing lineups, unless he's riding the bench with a lead.
Leave a comment:
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostYou make it seem like he is just playing decent. The guy was leading the league in Net rating and leading the team Def rating. So far his short sample size shows his the best back up Center in the league.
Sent from my LG-H831 using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
Lupe wrote: View PostRight now our best lineup that plays a lot of minutes every game is our starters with Siakam swapped out for 2Pat so Lowry-DeMar-Carroll-2Pat-Valanciunas. +33.4 netRTG, 3 points higher than the Lowry+Bench unit.
However when you swap out JV for Bebe and Carroll for Powell you get a +69.9 netRTG.
Also our starters with JV replaced for Bebe (Lowry-DD-Carroll-Siakam-Bebe) have a +41.8 netRTG.
Pretty hard to say those latter two units aren't "playing against starters", and they have the highest netRTGs of our 11 most used lineups. Small sample size at this point in the season though.
Everybody wants norm and Pat to start (I think?). That kinda makes siakam and Carroll scola starters.
Which questions to a degree the merit of a starter and matchups. Most of the time the starters are the best players but we have a great bench and they are playing meaningful minutes vs our opponents. Our team has played 1200 mins and 250 mins of that belong to the starters as a unit. Somewhere in those 1000 mins I gotta assume that our backups have played vs the top players in the sport and succeeded. I think it's reductive to blame all the problems of the starters on siakam or reduce the accomplishments of our backups to inferior competition. Some of that is happening and some of it is problems with all of our players and our system. Some of it is just other teams are better or better that night.
That said, I blame jv 😉
Leave a comment:
-
If I say DD sucks on D it seems the response is that he needs to try harder. If I saw the same thing about jv then it seems some of the response is that it's siakams fault, pat needs to start, the scheme is wrong, etc.
Yes, adjustments can be made but they both suck on D. Jv is the anchor. Demar has some physical potential to be better. I'm not sure jv does outside of certain matchups and I'm not sure either jv or demar have the bball IQ to improve reads/positioning.
I'm more interested to find solutions of how to improve the team than I am in favouring an individual on the team or winning an argument.
When I posted video breakdown of noel, it includes highlights and lowlights. I'm very skeptical that a deal gets done for good reason but I'm also desperate to improve our team. IMO we need more talent/improve fit and it's very hard to acquire.
Leave a comment:
-
DanH wrote: View PostIt is very possible that if BeBe was a starting quality C, he might fit better with the way Lowry/DD play. Sadly, he is not, so it is irrelevant.
In the past 5 yrs the league has only gotten faster and produces more and more mismatches for jv as a younger and different breed of player enters the league. Young players like kanter, vuc and nurkic are finding diminishing roles.
Personally I'd rather get out in front of this ASAP.
Leave a comment:
-
DanH wrote: View PostIf fit is the concern, we are discussing the wrong position. JV fits fine (read: great) with the stars so long as you have a floor stretching PF on the floor.
Leave a comment:
-
DanH wrote: View PostYou don't think Biz getting starter's minutes while JV was out had something to do with his higher minutes averages?
Just look at the playoffs in the first 10 games before JV was hurt. Biz averaged 17.5 MPG.
Jv also got hurt and we needed to biz. If we face Drummond or Dwight we will need jv but Tristan/love/Frye or horford is a different look for jv.
Also our guards struggled on offense. No guarantee jv gets the ball if they play our current offense. We need jv to anchor the D regardless. Pat and Bebe are the anchor ATM.
Leave a comment:
-
DanH wrote: View PostBeBe has literally only played in 4 games in the clutch this year. Valanciunas has played in 10.
When he's closing out games, it's because we have a big lead. So, yes, we do win more often when we have huge leads in the 4th. Shocker.
Bebe has played until the 4-6 mark and Pat has closed. Let's make sure the game is within single digits before we call it clutch.
The fact that jv doesn't close every game as our #3 player and most important defender in favour of a dleague call up is already alarming for a supposed contender.
Leave a comment:
-
DanH wrote: View PostAgain, if we can convince the opposition to play their bench players 4 more minutes a game too, that logic holds up.
We need jv to guard our direct rivals like horford and Tristan. He struggles. At the very least we need him to matchup vs a big like Dwight. He struggles vs guards like kemba and Kyrie. Or perimter bigs like love, Frye, Millsap, etc.
We don't even use jvs offensive to punish these matchups.
Leave a comment:
-
DanH wrote: View PostIf he played against starters, which he doesn't, sure.
However when you swap out JV for Bebe and Carroll for Powell you get a +69.9 netRTG.
Also our starters with JV replaced for Bebe (Lowry-DD-Carroll-Siakam-Bebe) have a +41.8 netRTG.
Pretty hard to say those latter two units aren't "playing against starters", and they have the highest netRTGs of our 11 most used lineups. Small sample size at this point in the season though.
Leave a comment:
-
DanH wrote: View PostIf he played against starters, which he doesn't, sure.
Sent from my LG-H831 using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
DanH wrote: View PostYeah, except Pat has a season and a half of time with closing lineups against the opposition's best players in clutch game winning situations that suggests he would kill as a starter, and he has a raw rookie who doesn't fit with the starters in front of him, while Nogueira has basically zero data on him against non-backup opposition and has an established starting C in front of him.
Yeah, that's totally the same thing.
Sent from my LG-H831 using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: