I wonder if someone like the Nets would bite on Carroll + Bebe instead of Carroll + pick
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything 2017 Off-Season
Collapse
X
-
If we're treading water as a top 3 team in the East until Lebron starts to decline we might as well just hang on to Carroll and our draft picks and let Tucker walk, only bringing back Lowry and Ibaka. Could do CoJo + Bebe for a future 1st or something to cut more salary.
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View PostOk you are going to all think I am joking but I am dead serious. What if collectivetly as a fan base we each donate 5 bucks to pay lebron to retire and play for the Cleveland Browns for 2 years? Similar to Jordan. It at least gives us a shot.
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View PostOk you are going to all think I am joking but I am dead serious. What if collectivetly as a fan base we each donate 5 bucks to pay lebron to retire and play for the Cleveland Browns for 2 years? Similar to Jordan. It at least gives us a shot.
Comment
-
-
JV + DW for Murray and Gasol (to mach salaries) makes so much sence for both sides.
And i'm really concerned about brunging PJ Tucker back. He can't drible, shot 32% from 3 in a postseason though being open a lot of times...
Yeah he's critical for D...but maybe Ibaka and Powell will be enough, and Masai can spend some money on more reliable offensive player.No new friends (c)
Comment
-
MoscowRussia wrote: View PostJV + DW for Murray and Gasol (to mach salaries) makes so much sence for both sides.
And i'm really concerned about brunging PJ Tucker back. He can't drible, shot 32% from 3 in a postseason though being open a lot of times...
Yeah he's critical for D...but maybe Ibaka and Powell will be enough, and Masai can spend some money on more reliable offensive player.
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostKeep in mind, the Raptors can spend money to keep Tucker because they have his rights. Unless the "more reliable offensive player" is Patterson, letting Tucker go doesn't really free up money to spend elsewhere.
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostKeep in mind, the Raptors can spend money to keep Tucker because they have his rights. Unless the "more reliable offensive player" is Patterson, letting Tucker go doesn't really free up money to spend elsewhere.
Still it sound a bit like "pay him because you can" instead of "pay him because you need him"No new friends (c)
Comment
-
MoscowRussia wrote: View PostCan't Raptors sign "somebody" staying under the cap and then sign Ibaka and Lowry using there rights??
Still it sound a bit like "pay him because you can" instead of "pay him because you need him"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
Comment