Does anyone believe our offence would be where it's at if we had Carroll, Siakam and Biz starting?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything (2016-2017) Regular Season Game Threads
Collapse
X
-
Jangles wrote: View PostDoes anyone believe our offence would be where it's at if we had Carroll, Siakam and Biz starting?
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
white men can't jump wrote: View PostWould our D really even be better? Did nobody notice how badly Pat and Bebe got "burned" in space coming to help on the p'n'r and on penetration? JV is not the problem. In general the C position is not the issue.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
white men can't jump wrote: View PostWould our D really even be better? Did nobody notice how badly Pat and Bebe got "burned" in space coming to help on the p'n'r and on penetration? JV is not the problem. In general the C position is not the issue.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Jangles wrote: View PostI think it would be a little better, but certainly not a difference maker. Biz's mobility would help some. The other drawback with that starting line up is that our guards would get blown by even more because of the extra energy they would need to expend on scoring the ball.
I honestly just think it's time to discard this notion that Casey is a defensive coach. Does he try to be? Maybe. However our D only looked sustainable one year while he's been here, and that was last year when someone else was in charge of designing it.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
white men can't jump wrote: View PostYeah but again, last night Pat and Bebe struggled, and a lot of that was a lack of rotations to help them. They are both more mobile than Biz...even if you argue Bebe isnt his superior length/reach more than make up any difference.
I honestly just think it's time to discard this notion that Casey is a defensive coach. Does he try to be? Maybe. However our D only looked sustainable one year while he's been here, and that was last year when someone else was in charge of designing it.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Axel wrote: View PostShot blocking isn't the issue, it's the lack of help when a big does step up, no one rotates to cover them. You could have Prime Dikembe and it wouldn't help because weakside help (could be another big or guard or wing - so no indictment of an individual Raptor) isn't rotating to cover his man.
If we can't stop the penetration then we need better rotations to cover off the help that comes. Ideally we would do better stopping the penetration but I don't think that is happening with the players we have in the rotation right now.
Yes, dikembe would help.
Comment
-
lewro wrote: View PostA good shot blocker might only block 5℅ of shots but changing shots, deflections and shots that aren't taken all add up. It's not the only part of defense but it's a big one.
Yes, dikembe would help.Heir, Prince of Cambridge
If you see KeonClark in the wasteland, please share your food and water with him.
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostPretty hilarious people think that this D wouldn't be better with Biz. He is really the only thing missing.
Sent from my LG-H831 using Tapatalk
It's Greer they say.... Where's Greer now? How's his current team doing defensively?
Personnel matter people!
Comment
-
lewro wrote: View PostA good shot blocker might only block 5℅ of shots but changing shots, deflections and shots that aren't taken all add up. It's not the only part of defense but it's a big one.
Yes, dikembe would help.
Comment
-
special1 wrote: View PostThis is what some people don't seem to understand.... it's not only about blocking shots. It's also the presence.
We generally get effort from most guys. Communication seems to be inconsistent. Accountability is pretty much non-existent. And our scheme has seen some slippage compared to last year. And we dont always play with good pace, sometimes trying too hard to run.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
Comment