planetmars wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything Pascal Siakam
Collapse
X
-
golden wrote: View Post
Almost every team is mediocre this year. Only a few teams have records that are leaps & bounds ahead than the Raptors. It's all just degrees of mediocre. I dunno how much you can weight team record this season.
There really is no science to the vote. It's a feeling and I'm analyzing who I think makes the team based on feelings. Nobody pays attention to Toronto.. especially since they've been pretty bad all year (except for maybe the past month or so - and even then not much love).
I brought up DeMar earlier. He's pretty much a lock. But Toronto could surpass Chicago quite easily before the season ends. Is DeMar that much better than Pascal? By the stats they are pretty even. Give DeMar the edge on a few advanced stats.. but Pascal on most counting stats (except for ppg which matters). Plus he was an all-star starter. Pascal didn't even make it to the game. Not even as an injury replacement.
DeMar however was on a better team for a lot longer than Pascal was, and that will sway voters. Plus DeMar was mentioned along side Michael Jordan for some point streaks that he had during the year.
Pascal has been a foot note. I bet most media members would still consider Fred as the MVP to the Raptors this year and not Pascal. Would anyone really be surprised if Fred got more votes than Pascal did when it was all over?
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
There are degrees for sure.. but someone like Jimmy would get more votes than Pascal simply by being on what was for most of the season the #1 team in the East. Pascal was for the majority of the season was on a play-in team.
There really is no science to the vote. It's a feeling and I'm analyzing who I think makes the team based on feelings. Nobody pays attention to Toronto.. especially since they've been pretty bad all year (except for maybe the past month or so - and even then not much love).
I brought up DeMar earlier. He's pretty much a lock. But Toronto could surpass Chicago quite easily before the season ends. Is DeMar that much better than Pascal? By the stats they are pretty even. Give DeMar the edge on a few advanced stats.. but Pascal on most counting stats (except for ppg which matters). Plus he was an all-star starter. Pascal didn't even make it to the game. Not even as an injury replacement.
DeMar however was on a better team for a lot longer than Pascal was, and that will sway voters. Plus DeMar was mentioned along side Michael Jordan for some point streaks that he had during the year.
Pascal has been a foot note. I bet most media members would still consider Fred as the MVP to the Raptors this year and not Pascal. Would anyone really be surprised if Fred got more votes than Pascal did when it was all over?
Comment
-
golden wrote: View Post
Butler has only played 53 games, so that's another criteria that needs to be mentioned. Durant has only played 48 games. Is there a minimum games played to even qualify for All-NBA, like there are for stats?
Most recent was Lebron who played 45 games last year (out of 72). Wade in 2012 who played 49 games (out of 62). But for an 82 game schedule, Yao Ming played in 49 games and made it.
So I'd say that's a pretty good barometer. KD will clear that easily.
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View Post
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/lea...e-all-nba-team
Most recent was Lebron who played 45 games last year (out of 72). Wade in 2012 who played 49 games (out of 62). But for an 82 game schedule, Yao Ming played in 49 games and made it.
So I'd say that's a pretty good barometer. KD will clear that easily.
Comment
-
chris wrote: View Postjokic, embiid, giannis, and tatum are locks for frontcourt spots on the first two teams.
can pascal make it over durant, lebron, derozan, butler, or bam? he's got a case but i suspect voters will go with the institutions of durant and lebron despite the missed games for the former and poor record of the latter.
honestly i'll be shocked if he even makes third team. he deserves to, but that doesn't mean anything9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
KeonClark wrote: View Post
Embiid was 2nd team Center last year. I suspect he will be again, voters actual vote C/F/Guard again.
so voters can vote them both embiid and jokic onto the first team, but if they pick the wrong position they could end up missing out on all-nba altogether.
Comment
-
chris wrote: View Post
there's a bit of a controversy about this this year based on this tweet from marc stein:
so voters can vote them both embiid and jokic onto the first team, but if they pick the wrong position they could end up missing out on all-nba altogether.
A guy like derozan it's murkier and could really fuck up his all nba placement (to me he's a 2nd team all nba small forward, I got giannis and KD team 1 and lebron and demar team 2). This would also trickle down to effect Pascal, we got guys like Tatum and Butler still not on a team. Pascal could get (wrongfully) snubbed again.9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
KeonClark wrote: View Post
What that tells me is they're both gonna get mostly all center votes, and be first and 2nd team center, just like last year, since they're both clearly centers. They play 100% center, there's no grey area. Just the nba is making it muddier than it needs to be as usual.
A guy like derozan it's murkier and could really fuck up his all nba placement (to me he's a 2nd team all nba small forward, I got giannis and KD team 1 and lebron and demar team 2). This would also trickle down to effect Pascal, we got guys like Tatum and Butler still not on a team. Pascal could get (wrongfully) snubbed again.
and if that is how it shakes out, i think tatum has a pretty good shot at first team alongside giannis and will at least make second team. if i can set aside my blind hatred for the celtics for a second, i would say i think he has a better case than derozan at least, as they're about a draw on offence but tatum is also an excellent defender and on the better team.
Comment
Comment