Other Scott wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would you trade...
Collapse
X
-
-
Other Scott wrote: View PostLet's be real, getting out from Carroll was to dodge the luxury tax. Powell getting a bigger role was a nice side effect, but there was nothing preventing the team from relegating Carroll to the end of the bench role, or like give him the Landry Fields "Break in case of emergency" treatment.
And Powell (AND Wright) getting a bigger role was not a "side effect", it was the plan. You draft these guys to one day play and become the new role player over the more expensive older vets on the bench. That's how you maintain flexibility going forward.9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View PostSucked not having a pick in 2013.. pretty good talent all around. Although I wonder too if Masai would have selected Giannis over someone like Olynyk if he had the #12 pick still.
He may not have wanted to pass up on a Canadian kid in his first tenure as a Raptor GM. Either way it's too bad BC didn't give up the 2014 pick for Lowry instead of the 2013 pick.
Comment
-
Keeping Carroll would have been terrible. It does only take one player to torpedo team chemistry.
Everybody agrees that it sucks that a) the signing didn't work out in the first place, and b) it cost a late first to dump him and move on. I'm sure Masai is first in line acknowledging that this is a less than ideal outcome. But at the same time, he took a poor situation, pulled several positives out of it, and the roster is now better for it. That's a GM's job. He is not going to bat a thousand, but this was a decent recovery. He had a lot of other moving parts this summer, evidently at the end of the day the pick was what it cost to get rid of Carroll."We're playing in a building." -- Kawhi Leonard
Comment
-
JamesNaismith wrote: View PostSorry I'm never a fan of trading 1st rounders to dump salary (period).
A "late 1st rounder" is exactly what OG Anunoby is and he is by far out of all the younger talent we have the most intriguing and best upside imo. You really have no idea who happens to be available at your pick. Despite as much as I love Lowry, I'd much rather have the pick back to be able to have had Giannis right now. The last thing you want is situation exactly like the Giannis pick where we were absolutely desperate to get in where we should have been able to just draft him ourselves but are unable to do so just look at what that cost us...truly franchise altering.
Of course I'm very happy with swapping out the flaming pile of dogshit Carroll was and McDribbles for CJ and for additional playing time for Norm but not a fan of losing a 1st in order to do so, sorry.
Going back to my original point. In order to develop rookies (we have the 905 to help) you want them to get minutes at the professional level. Bruno not included we have Bebe, Poetl (who was the right pick and best pick in my opinion), Powell, Delon, and Siakam that all factor in some way in the future. This is why we traded cojo and Demarre. Not only to get under the tax but to also give these players a chance to shine. Cojo was good but long term he wasn't a solution to start and he would have demanded starters wages... that would have put us way above the tax. Remember we had him on a value contract of around 6-8 million a year for 3 years. Cojo played the SG spot and the PG spot so that takes away norm AND delons minutes. Same with Demarre. Does CJ miles go counter to that argument... partially but he is a much more serviceable player for cheaper.
Again missing out on developing a player this year when we will have a pick at 20 something ... unless another OG situation comes up it will not be that big of a missed opportunity and it will be difficult to find minutes to those develop that person. Sometimes in order to correct you need to do this. It isn't a mistake .They did this trade knowing full well what they are doing. Again it fits into the time line. They still have the assets that if they succeed they will be able to go all in and push the chips into the center of the table for the next two years to see what happens. If not in year 3 you can do a soft tank and trade all of your expiring deals. You will get young decent players/ midround picks for lowry... same with derozan... same with ibaka. Perhaps even lottery picks and players for all that.
In 3 years that gives our current crew of young players enough time to develop to see whose worth keeping around and they will be entering their primes at that point in time. I hope we keep demar because ...loyalty and all that but we will see what happens. It really isn't a bad situation at all considering where we were and as we project into the future.
Comment
-
TrueTorontoFan wrote: View Postits also possible that we may have had an even better pick
Comment
-
CalibreMC wrote: View PostSpeaking of trades...
JV and future second for Bledsoe??
Thoughts...
1. You don't think Phoenix can get better than that for Bledsoe?
2. Do the Suns need or want another big man?
3. Suns need plus defenders and a PG to replace Bledsoe.If we knew half as much about coaching an NBA team as we think, we"d know twice as much as we do.
Comment
-
planetmars wrote: View PostLike if we didn't trade for Lowry at all you mean? Lowry wasn't "LOWRY" until the year after (and after the Delon said no to the trade). He was decent (and played poorly at times) but definitely was not extraordinary. We may have been the 10th or 11th worst team instead of the 12th I guess.. but I don't think we would have been in the top 8/9.
Comment
-
Comment