Red and White wrote:
View Post
Last year, with the core guys being DeRozan-Turkoglu-Bosh-Bargnani plus a point guard, Jack et al surprisingly only put up 1.02 ppp (points per possession) for, while giving up 1.15 ppp (http://www.82games.com/0910/09TOR3.HTM#5man), for a -99 overall. Calderon et al put up 1.14 ppp for and gave up 1.14 ppp as well (http://www.82games.com/0910/09TOR1.HTM#5man), for a -8 overall over a similar number of minutes. Does this mean Calderon or Jack was better with the starting unit last year?
This year, assuming the core guys are DeRozan-Weems-Johnson-Bargnani plus a point guard (it's not like we have data for a lineup with Kleiza, etc), Jack *seems* like a better fit because last year that lineup posted 1.17 ppp for and 0.90 ppp against, for an overall +16. Calderon with the same guys (and over similar minutes) posted 1.18 ppp for and 1.09 ppp against, for an overall +1 (indicating the other team somehow had more possessions over those minutes). Mind you, the sample size for this lineup is like 10% the size of the main lineup, so I'm curious where you find your "numerous stats showing that calderon (though talented) dosnt work with this team as much as jack"?
Leave a comment: