Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In defense of Sonny Weems

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arsenalist
    replied
    I pegged him to average between 12-15 ppg and he was doing just fine until his injuries hit. I like him as a talent and as a potential bench player, I do question his motor and desire. Can't have him floating around playing hard on every third possession. I say there are others out there who will bring the same with more consistency and better effort..

    Leave a comment:


  • footarez
    replied
    Maleko wrote: View Post
    I like and I don't like Weems. As a cheap bench guy, and that would mean $1.5M in my mind, perhaps. He would have to learn to pick his shots, and I like the 'idea' of him as a defensive 2, and I do think he can be that kind of player, but he has to prove it before he can even be a $2-3M guy. His defensive numbers aside, saying he is a better 3pt shooter is not painting the whole picture, since as WJF said, he shot under 28% (for a career average of 24.1%), and that is horrible. Sure he's not Shaq shooting a 3, but not someone you want to be shooting it.

    If he can stay within his game (which he did at the end of last year), work on his 3pt shooting...a LOT, and focus on being a defensive 2 (not a chucker 2), then I say a 1+1 contract (second 1 being a team option) in the $1M range first year and $2M in his second say, as an incentive to play within his game and improve the areas he needs to for the TEAM is warranted.

    My opinion, is $3M is too much for him right now.
    I agree.Playing him at the 3 was something I couldn't understand cause doesn't make sense to me.He can be good.He isn't that bad right now.Considering his injury this season for that price he is actually great bench player + I really do believe he will be a lot better next season.

    Leave a comment:


  • RaptorsFan4Life
    replied
    This thread is pretty poinless. Almost everyone here here is a Weems haters.

    Leave a comment:


  • raptorsking
    replied
    i feel bad for weems he gets bashed by his own fans on twitter.lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • ezz_bee
    replied
    Interesting thread, I am also someone who was high on Sonny last year and low on him now. I would be okay with bringing him back on a reasonable contract if we move him over to the 2 spot. However I would still play him behind leandhro if he exercises his player option. I agree that most of Barbs points come "out of the offense" but I don't think that they are necessarily a bad thing. I do think that his "one man fast breaks" do add some energy to the bench and put the opposing defense on their heels and change the momentum. However, it is hit and miss so at the end it is probably a wash. However, a wash is better than having someone come in who only makes a negative impact. Even if barbosa opts in he should be a trade-able asset. I'd be nice to see a
    DeRozen/Barbosa/Weems
    Line up next year, maybe we can Slide Barbosa over to the point in certain situations (especially in the case of an injury to Calderon/Bayless) to give Sonny a little more burn at the 2. If he steps it up package Barbs in w/ Calderon and/or Barg's to get a serviceable PG/SF/C (Filling holes that weren't addressed at the draft). If Sonny doesn't work keep barbs and draft a sg with our mid first round pick next year (i'm assuming we will still be in the lottery but not near the bottom like we are this year)

    Leave a comment:


  • e2thed
    replied
    As for Sonny Weems , like the great Jack Armstrong would say , "GIT THAT GAARBAGE OUTTA HEA"

    Leave a comment:


  • jeff_hostetler
    replied
    I use 82games.com to find the player's PER/Opp.PER - these are adjusted to 48 minutes/game. But since PER is minutes independent (ie, it shouldn't change depending on how many minutes played, the 48 min adjustment is irrelevant.)

    I get the other stats, like steals per game, 3pt%, etc, from espn.

    Leave a comment:


  • Maleko
    replied
    Tim W. wrote: View Post
    Just out of interest, whe are you getting those numbers from?
    RaptorsFan4Life wrote: View Post
    Thabo Sefolosha | 5.1 PT | .471 of 4.2 FG | .747 of 1.0 FT | .275 of 1.3 3P | 4.4/0.8 RB | 1.41 AS | 0.48 BL | 1.23 ST | 0.70 TO | 2.16 PF | 25.9 MN | 79/79 GS

    I'm guessing he's getting the #s from BasketballReference.
    I would say from 82games.com, which does draw/refer basketballreference.

    Leave a comment:


  • RaptorsFan4Life
    replied
    Tim W. wrote: View Post
    Just out of interest, whe are you getting those numbers from?
    Thabo Sefolosha | 5.1 PT | .471 of 4.2 FG | .747 of 1.0 FT | .275 of 1.3 3P | 4.4/0.8 RB | 1.41 AS | 0.48 BL | 1.23 ST | 0.70 TO | 2.16 PF | 25.9 MN | 79/79 GS

    I'm guessing he's getting the #s from BasketballReference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tim W.
    replied
    jeff_hostetler wrote: View Post
    Just to throw it out there, I'm going to compare Sonny Weems' numbers as a SG this year to those of Aaron Afflalo and Thabo Sefolosha: two young SG's well known for good/excellent defensive play.

    PER/Opp. PER/StlsPG
    Weems: 14.6/12/0.6
    Afflalo: 13.7/16.2/0.5
    Sefalosha: 11.6/13.2/1.2

    Weems' offensive PER is not only better than both of theirs, but his defensive PER is as well. Sefalosha gets more steals and can defend the 3 very well (Opp. PER of 10.7). But he's basically got zero offense (PER at the 3 = 10.1).
    Afflalo is a great 3 point shooter, but his defensive numbers aren't actually that good.

    So? Is it heresy to call it a wash?

    Weems is not only younger than both of them, but he has less experience. His 3 point shooting percentages - while not very good right now - have increased significantly each year, and are basically on par with Sefalosha. Both Afflalo and Sefalosha are starters for playoff teams in the West. A number of people here don't even want Weems back.

    What am I saying? Perception is a funny thing.
    Just out of interest, whe are you getting those numbers from?

    Leave a comment:


  • Raptor4Ever
    replied
    Tim W. wrote: View Post
    I did the exact same thing, so you're not alone.
    Wow, Congrats Timmi. You are talking about something that is not related to AB !!! Are you sure that this is the RIGHT thing to do ?
    I think you should keep your focus on how bad of rebounder is AB. We need you there Pal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tim W.
    replied
    Maleko wrote: View Post
    Thanks Jeff, I was reading the PER line. Ha! Sorry bout that.
    I did the exact same thing, so you're not alone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raptor4Ever
    replied
    Sonny needs to hang out more with Amir, maybe get Liston to write few articles about him on RR, hire Buddah fan to hype him up and the FreeAmir on tweeter guy from last year to do free Sonny

    I don't know what happened there with Sonny but he was high on everyone's list last year and suddenly now , no one is willing to give him a chance. I remember people on this board were talking about a 5 year 20 million for sonny this time last year.

    Leave a comment:


  • RaptorsFan4Life
    replied
    Raptors_ wrote: View Post
    i know this is kinda stupid but what does PER mean?
    wiki wrote:
    The Player Efficiency Rating is ESPN Insider writer John Hollinger's all-in-one basketball rating, which attempts to boil down all of a player's contributions into one number. Using a detailed formula, Hollinger developed a system that rates every player's statistical performance.
    Wiki wrote:
    All calculations begin with what is called unadjusted PER (uPER). The formula is:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/7...a8dd22fca8.png

    Where




    Once uPER is calculated, it must be adjusted for team pace and normalized to the league to become PER:


    This final step takes away the advantage held by players whose teams play a fastbreak style (and therefore have more possessions and more opportunities to do things on offense), and then sets the league average to 15.00.
    Also note that it is impossible to calculate PER (at least in the conventional manner described above) for NBA seasons prior to 1978, as the league did not keep track of turnovers before that year.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_Efficiency_Rating

    Leave a comment:


  • Raptors_
    replied
    i know this is kinda stupid but what does PER mean?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X