Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lester Hudson PG
Collapse
X
-
I don't understand where all you people are coming from! Toronto is trying to find a backup PG so they bring in 10 contracts that being Ben Uzoh and Justin Dentmon; so tell me so far has any of these 2 guys stood out and said sign me to a contract for next year at all? Now you look at Lester Hudson and what he has done with his 10 day contracts stands out a lot more and says sign me! You can only judge with what they all do on the court and what I have seen with Lester over Ben and Justin I would say Lester is a has a better chance of being signed then either of the Toronto PG's. Remember we are looking especially for a backup PG. Lester is putting up good numbers in comparison to Ben and Justin!!
-
draftedraptor wrote: View PostLets go head to head with Andrea Bargnani's career year for you to appreciate Hudson's contributions.
Andrea vs Hudson
18 shots/ game shooting 45% as a 7-footer vs hudson's 6-3 with 14shots/game at 40%
3 turnovers/game for both
4 threes/game at 35% vs 6 three's a game at 30%
5.2 rebounds/game vs 4.4 rebounds/game
1.8 assists/ game vs 4 assists/ game
10million/ year against hudson's 500,000/ year.
edit : this is not a dig on bargnani. But we have to give it to a fringe player who is working hard in his second chance. Same goes for Alan Anderson.
Consider the match up nightmare Bargnani is.
Consider the Raptors performance with and without Bargnani in the lineup.
I recall Sundiata Gaines having some respectable numbers with Utah, Toronto, and New Jersey last year. What has he done this year?
Anyone in the NBA has talent. Anyone in the NBA can get hot at any time. Anyone in the NBA could be really effective until the scouting report comes out.
In my opinion, this is some superficial thinking at best. Every year a 10-day amazes. A big part of that is "10 days".
Leave a comment:
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostI do find it comical.
The guy is taking 17 shots per game, shooting just 40%. He is taking over 7 three's a game, hitting under 2, and shooting 23%. His turnovers are 3 per game. Unlike the phenomena that was Jeremy Lin, he is not even helping the Cavs win (which is really pissing me off! Come on Cavs, quit tanking! Ummmmm. Pot, Kettle. Kettle, Pot).
Ugh.
Come on people.
The only positive I can spin for him is he gets to the line 5 times again and hits 92%.
Andrea vs Hudson
18 shots/ game shooting 45% as a 7-footer vs hudson's 6-3 with 14shots/game at 40%
3 turnovers/game for both
4 threes/game at 35% vs 6 three's a game at 30%
5.2 rebounds/game vs 4.4 rebounds/game
1.8 assists/ game vs 4 assists/ game
10million/ year against hudson's 500,000/ year.
edit : this is not a dig on bargnani. But we have to give it to a fringe player who is working hard in his second chance. Same goes for Alan Anderson.Last edited by draftedraptor; Thu Apr 12, 2012, 09:31 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
MangoKid wrote: View PostAre we really at that point where we're dissecting the merits of 3rd and 4th string point guards? There's a reason why Hudson was not in the nba this season up until a few weeks ago - because he's not very good. Personally, I want no part of Hudson for next season. We can do a lot better than him.
The guy is taking 17 shots per game, shooting just 40%. He is taking over 7 three's a game, hitting under 2, and shooting 23%. His turnovers are 3 per game. Unlike the phenomena that was Jeremy Lin, he is not even helping the Cavs win (which is really pissing me off! Come on Cavs, quit tanking! Ummmmm. Pot, Kettle. Kettle, Pot).
Ugh.
Come on people.
The only positive I can spin for him is he gets to the line 5 times again and hits 92%.
Leave a comment:
-
Are we really at that point where we're dissecting the merits of 3rd and 4th string point guards? There's a reason why Hudson was not in the nba this season up until a few weeks ago - because he's not very good. Personally, I want no part of Hudson for next season. We can do a lot better than him.
Leave a comment:
-
Raptorsss wrote: View PostSorry, I prefer Uzoh to Hudson.
Leave a comment:
-
c_bcm wrote: View PostFair enough. I might be willing to hang on to him if we can sign him on the cheap. Or sign as trade bait to plump up an offer for a more talented player at one of our positions of concern. Either way I don't see getting rid of him only to be replaced by someone older, less experienced, and therefore cheaper. Doesn't make sense if we are to "hit the ground running" next season.
Leave a comment:
-
Soft Euro wrote: View PostBecause he will be a rfa and might be gone as hopefully we won't make the qualifying offer. Bayless' quality as a pg has been discussed elsewhere, clearly I'm in the he'a-not-very-good-camp.
Leave a comment:
-
c_bcm wrote: View PostWhy do we need a good and cheap replacement for Bayless again? ...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: