Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fitting in Lowry with Calderon, Fields and DeRozan, What to do with Ed and JJ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mapko
    replied
    knowledgep wrote: View Post
    too early, a long way to go and a lot of time for BC to make additional changes
    Jonas's play will likely determine how much Gray plays.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mapko
    replied
    Lark Benson wrote: View Post
    All of this assumes the one near-impossibility for any team: a season without injuries. It also assumes that every game will see the same rotations despite matchups. Depth is a good thing, even if on paper there aren't enough minutes to go around.
    Injuries!! Excellent point. Last year we finished the season with 2 D-Leaguers as starters. That should not be an issue due to a lot more depth.
    -Also, players not getting a lot of minutes -if not happy about it -PUSH the starters. Competition is good.

    Leave a comment:


  • knowledgep
    replied
    too early, a long way to go and a lot of time for BC to make additional changes

    Leave a comment:


  • Quirk
    replied
    Prime wrote: View Post
    Dragic. Brooks plays for the Suns
    I was looking at 10-11.

    http://www.82games.com/1011/1011HOU2.HTM

    Leave a comment:


  • minks77
    replied
    Hugmenot wrote: View Post
    The thought of Gray playing 24 minutes per game is really depressing to me. I am OK with him as the 5th big but not in a major (12+ mpg) contributor.

    I agree. If A 2 the G has much more of a role than Jamaal had last year I'm going to throw a fit.

    Frontcourt:
    4: AB/ED/Amir
    5: JV/AJ/AG/ED

    JV would do well to be able to stay on the floor 24 minutes per. His biggest problem I've seen is he fouls like, well, an aggressive 19 year old with more length than sense. I don't think it'll be a long term issue or anything but I bet he struggles with fouls his rookie year.

    Leave a comment:


  • BallaBalla
    replied
    CalgaryRapsFan wrote: View Post
    I totally agree. Ideally a team has 8 core players (5 starters, backup PG, backup wing who is usually the 6th man/sparkplug scorer off the bench, and backup big), with another 2-3 secondary rotation players who are used situationally and/or based on matchups.

    The biggest problem with the logjams the Raps have at various positions right now, is that there aren't clearly defined roles. The Raps are deep in secondary rotation players, but are lacking legit starters.
    Agree, and this has been our problem off on and on for about 12 years, and definitely for the last 5
    Its why some games players like kleiza play well and others he sux. Its like any job. When you come to work, if someone kept changing your responsibilities, promoting you, demoting you, etc. you would find it difficult to be consistent and contribute.

    Leave a comment:


  • CNOTE
    replied
    "10.pancit from manila
    So d12 staying till trade deadline 2013 is the big move of orl? Will u give your opinion who will be a better pro jV of tor or myers leonard of portland? Thanks

    ◦Joel Brigham
    I’ve been signing the praises of Jonas Valanciunas for the better part of the last year. We get a lot of Raptors questions, so I’ve been keeping up with him here and there throughout the year. He tends to dominate his competition, and his skill set at his height should translate well to the NBA game. I think he and Kyle Lowry save the Raptors, honestly. Really looking forward to seeing how much they improve next season.

    Nowhere near as sold on Meyers Leonard. He’s a big boy, and freakishly fast and athletic for a guy that size, but I’ve talked to scouts who said his attitude isn’t great and his teammates didn’t really like him at U of I. Players similar to Leonard have been painfully average at best in the past, so I’d rather put my money on Valanciunas. I think he’ll be the better pro by a mile."

    Nice praise from a non toronto writer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugmenot
    replied
    Quirk wrote: View Post
    Add in Aaron gray and JV splitting 48 minutes, for 24 each at the 1.
    We disagree on this one has I have serious doubts Gray and JV will average 32 minutes between them, even when both are healthy.

    The thought of Gray playing 24 minutes per game is really depressing to me. I am OK with him as the 5th big but not in a major (12+ mpg) contributor.

    Leave a comment:


  • tucas
    replied
    I feel like this is one of those threads that was made entirely too early. It's the beginning of the offseason and the roster we see now will be a lot different (hopefully) than the one on opening night. I think the front office sees the log jams and will find a way to fix it before the season starts to a point where we have the 8 or 9 man rotation that we need.

    Leave a comment:


  • CalgaryRapsFan
    replied
    Nilanka wrote: View Post
    Yup. The pecking order is one of the aspects I'll be following closest coming out of training camp. I'm all for internal competition, but if we're approaching the all-star break, and we still have 5 wing players "battling" for a spot in the 8-man rotation, we'll be in trouble.

    The sooner Casey gets his rotation down, the better. Players need to know their roles, and expectations need to be kept in check.
    That's just it - how can guys properly develop, if they aren't getting sufficient and consistent playing time? And how can Casey get the most out of this team and have his guys develop on-court chemistry, if there isn't a consistent lineup and rotation?

    It's in the best interest of the team and to all the players involved, to clear the PF and wing logjams. The only other option is to declare a "winner" of the positional battles coming out of training camp and sticking to the decision, which would leave one PF (Amir or Davis, plus Acy) and one wing (JJ or Kleiza) firmly glued to the bench; no more sharing of backup duties. How would that help the player's individual development or be in the best interest of the team? How could that possibly be a better strategy than trading the unused assets for a better, useable player that would actually contribute to the team on the court??

    Leave a comment:


  • Nilanka
    replied
    CalgaryRapsFan wrote: View Post
    I totally agree. Ideally a team has 8 core players (5 starters, backup PG, backup wing who is usually the 6th man/sparkplug scorer off the bench, and backup big), with another 2-3 secondary rotation players who are used situationally and/or based on matchups.

    The biggest problem with the logjams the Raps have at various positions right now, is that there aren't clearly defined roles. The Raps are deep in secondary rotation players, but are lacking legit starters.
    Yup. The pecking order is one of the aspects I'll be following closest coming out of training camp. I'm all for internal competition, but if we're approaching the all-star break, and we still have 5 wing players "battling" for a spot in the 8-man rotation, we'll be in trouble.

    The sooner Casey gets his rotation down, the better. Players need to know their roles, and expectations need to be kept in check.

    Leave a comment:


  • CalgaryRapsFan
    replied
    jimmyhunter wrote: View Post
    If we successfully sign Fields then he'll be around for the duration of his contract because no teams going to want to acquire his backloaded deal. Ross will be around for this year because he's our pick and his skills fit with our flaws. DeRozan's on a short leash now but he still has room to improve. Klieza is obviously expendable but he might be valuable for Jonas' transition. James Johnson is our best defender but there are reports that there's now chance he returns. 1 or 2 of these wings are expendable assuming we're getting a wing back in a transaction. Jose and/or a PF can be included also. What we'd need in return is a proven, high-performance starting SF and a backup PG, maybe a big too. I feel like we're fairly secure at the PG,SG,PF and perhaps C positions for the future. SF definitely could be improved and I'm thinking we have the assets to improve right now.
    +1

    If reports of Gray returning are accurate, then we'd appear to be set at backup C. I assume Magloire has the inside track on returning as the veteran 3rd C, though it could be interesting to see how Daniel Orton does with the team in summer league.

    There are plenty of veteran backup PG type players on the market this offseason and, when combined with the fact that Calderon turns 31 before the start of next season and is an expiring contract, it would seem like the perfect time to utilize Calderon in a package of players (ie: Davis/Amir, JJ and possibly DD) to acquire a significantly upgraded starting SF.

    Leave a comment:


  • jimmyhunter
    replied
    If we successfully sign Fields then he'll be around for the duration of his contract because no teams going to want to acquire his backloaded deal. Ross will be around for this year because he's our pick and his skills fit with our flaws. DeRozan's on a short leash now but he still has room to improve. Klieza is obviously expendable but he might be valuable for Jonas' transition. James Johnson is our best defender but there are reports that there's now chance he returns. 1 or 2 of these wings are expendable assuming we're getting a wing back in a transaction. Jose and/or a PF can be included also. What we'd need in return is a proven, high-performance starting SF and a backup PG, maybe a big too. I feel like we're fairly secure at the PG,SG,PF and perhaps C positions for the future. SF definitely could be improved and I'm thinking we have the assets to improve right now.

    Leave a comment:


  • CalgaryRapsFan
    replied
    Nilanka wrote: View Post
    I agree 150%

    The concept that we should be 2 deep at every position isn't realistic. Instead, we want our 5 starters playing 30+ minutes per night, with a backup PG, a backup wing (preferably someone who could play both SG and SF), and a backup big (preferably someone who could play both PF and C). That's it. Maybe add another miscellaneous bench player at any position where appropriate.

    Anything more than this is too crowded (in terms of everyday rotations).
    I totally agree. Ideally a team has 8 core players (5 starters, backup PG, backup wing who is usually the 6th man/sparkplug scorer off the bench, and backup big), with another 2-3 secondary rotation players who are used situationally and/or based on matchups.

    The biggest problem with the logjams the Raps have at various positions right now, is that there aren't clearly defined roles. The Raps are deep in secondary rotation players, but are lacking legit starters.

    Leave a comment:


  • BallaBalla
    replied
    Nilanka wrote: View Post
    I agree 150%

    The concept that we should be 2 deep at every position isn't realistic. Instead, we want our 5 starters playing 30+ minutes per night, with a backup PG, a backup wing (preferably someone who could play both SG and SF), and a backup big (preferably someone who could play both PF and C). That's it. Maybe add another miscellaneous bench player at any position where appropriate.

    Anything more than this is too crowded (in terms of everyday rotations).
    +1

    That's just how basketball is played. Not only do the main guys want to play 30 + minutes, in most cases they need to in order to be at their most effective. All of the playoff teams have a heirarchy on their team, where there is no question who should be on the floor for most occasions in the 4th. We will be a better team if a top 9 can establish themselves and we go 10-11 deep only on back to backs or in special match-ups.

    I think we all agree on the starters. Jose, T-Ross, and Amir should be in the top 8. That last spot will probably be rotated between Ed, Klieza and JJ depending on the matchups or how they are playing.

    I can see JJ working his way into the regular rotation a lot easier because of the fact that he plays SF, but generally our success will depend on how well Lowry plays with AB, and how good JoVal is (because if he ends up sucking...well then, we know how the story goes).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X