Hollinger always seemed to have Colangelo and the Raptors pegged. Maybe that's why he's not popular with some on this forum. Though not foolproof, Hollinger is the very best at evaluating NCAA talent for the NBA draft.
I can't help but feel that the Grizzlies are much better off with Hollinger on board.
Basketball is slowly going the way of baseball where you need to have strong scouting and analytics groups if you want to be successful. With the harder cap coming, being creative and innovative is going to be crucial.
Basketball is slowly going the way of baseball where you need to have strong scouting and analytics groups if you want to be successful. With the harder cap coming, being creative and innovative is going to be crucial.
I found his numbers only truly worked to show the impact that star players had and did a piss poor job on middle tier guys, but I'm also of the school that believes basketball is one of those sports that can't be quantified with numbers and that the roles that are necessary on a team don't allow it to be properly analyzed with pure stats the way you could in baseball for example.
Comment