Jrice9 wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
#FireCasey
Collapse
X
-
Wild-ling#1 wrote: View PostBut why focus on some bad passes in the first half rather than that neither they, nor their coach, could break us down sufficiently in the fourth?
Or that they had one player ailing (but dressed) and we have two starters out?
Oh, right. Because you "have eyes". Okay, then.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostThe problem is this season we've shown no ability to blow out lesser teams. We let bad teams stay in games, which keeps the minutes high on DeMar and Lowry. Chris Paul's historical minutes are not a good comparison, as Paul also has faced criticism for wearing down in the playoffs at times.
Also in terms of semi blowouts where Casey didnt unleash the bench early enough the Bucks and Clippers games remind me
Comment
-
Chicago's struggles have a lot to do with Derrick Rose's unfortunate situation. The organization is paying him a lot of money and really wants to see him return to form or at least become a tradeable asset, but he's just not that player anymore. He was never a great shooter, and lost a lot of his athleticism through injury, and now he doesn't have a lot to contribute. That hurts the Bulls in a lot of ways.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
white men can't jump wrote: View PostBecause they still easily outplayed us in the fourth. As in, had we not created a gap in the first half, where their carelessness with the ball basically made the gap, we very likely lose, even with our hot shooting and kawhi being a no show.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Jrice9 wrote: View PostWhich recent playoff series has Chris Paul worn down in? I thought his thing and I could check some numbers was he always took it to the next level in the playoffs.
Also in terms of semi blowouts where Casey didnt unleash the bench early enough the Bucks and Clippers games remind metwitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Wild-ling#1 wrote: View PostPlease - If they'd outplayed us "easily" in the fourth, don't you think they would have won???
And going back...yes I have eyes. As do Jack and Leo, who both commented on how uncharacteristically sloppy the spurs were with the ball and how it was the big reason we were leading.
I honestly don't even know what you're arguing.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
white men can't jump wrote: View PostYou know the score counts all halves right? We outplayed them in the first half, but the difference was due to their sloppiness. The fact that they were unable to close a double digit gap doesn't mean they didnt outplay us down the stretch.
And going back...yes I have eyes. As do Jack and Leo, who both commented on how uncharacteristically sloppy the spurs were with the ball and how it was the big reason we were leading.
I honestly don't even know what you're arguing.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Now if you want to see a game where the Spurs outplayed someone "easily", I'd recommend their previous game with Philly. Not our game.
And as for your classy insinuation that I'm not making a coherent or consistent argument - What can I say? ... "Thanks - but no thanks".Last edited by Wild-ling#1; Thu Dec 10, 2015, 03:06 PM.
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View PostYep this is why if you're firing a coach you've really got to try your best to make sure you're getting someone elite or it's the same old story.
Comment
-
Wild-ling#1 wrote: View PostYeah, they count the scores from both halves. Good one.
They also got to within three points with (about) 5 minutes left ... and fell short.
Now if you want to see a game where the Spurs outplayed someone "easily", I'd recommend their previous game with Philly. Not our game.
And as for your classy insinuation that I'm not making a coherent or consistent argument - What can I say? ... "Thanks but no thanks".
So yeah, you seem to be playing the contrarian with no real point to make.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
white men can't jump wrote: View PostBecause they still easily outplayed us in the fourth. As in, had we not created a gap in the first half, where their carelessness with the ball basically made the gap, we very likely lose, even with our hot shooting and kawhi being a no show.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
white men can't jump wrote: View PostWell you're not making.g an argument. You seem to be sying if the spurs are so good, why couldn't they complete a comeback? Or that them sucking for a half wasn't them sucking, but the raptors maybe....dominating them? When anyone who's seen the Spurs play for the last near 20 years coming ld see they had a bad half especially turning it over....
So yeah, you seem to be playing the contrarian with no real point to make.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Save this -
(There ... let's call it "even")
Last edited by Wild-ling#1; Thu Dec 10, 2015, 03:15 PM.
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostThat's why their the Spurs. Everyone knew a run was coming in the fourth but, what we didn't know is how the raps would handle it.
They played like the spurs for a quarter and almost beat us. We played about as well as we could especially with two starters out, and still depended on them basically gifting us the lead we built in the first half.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Comment
-
white men can't jump wrote: View PostYou know the score counts all halves right? We outplayed them in the first half, but the difference was due to their sloppiness. The fact that they were unable to close a double digit gap doesn't mean they didnt outplay us down the stretch.
And going back...yes I have eyes. As do Jack and Leo, who both commented on how uncharacteristically sloppy the spurs were with the ball and how it was the big reason we were leading.
I honestly don't even know what you're arguing.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
By the way we won every quarter but the 4TH.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
Comment