I don't think Boston is interested either. They really don/t need to make a trade at this point, they're pretty well set with what they have. If anything they need to tweak the front court a little but reports are they are staying put.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything 2018 Off Season
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
KeonClark wrote: View PostI don't think philly and Boston are all that interested in taking a big risk/home run cut at this juncture and I get why. Magic and lebron don't seem interested in using assets right now. West and the clippers don't see a need to bid right now. I think the Knicks are drunk or stoned right now.
It leaves 3 teams at very similar junctures that would seem to want to add to their core and go all in: Portland, Washington and Toronto
Comment
-
KeonClark wrote: View PostI don't think philly and Boston are all that interested in taking a big risk/home run cut at this juncture and I get why. Magic and lebron don't seem interested in using assets right now. West and the clippers don't see a need to bid right now. I think the Knicks are drunk or stoned right now.
It leaves 3 teams at very similar junctures that would seem to want to add to their core and go all in: Portland, Washington and Toronto
Portland, Washington and us are in similar situations where we've basically maxed out our cores and can afford to take a risk to get better. Of those 3 we can put together by far the best asset package.
Comment
-
Mindlessness wrote: View PostSure, but I think they probably try to be objective?
And yeah, the prospects/picks that Philly would be offering, even if they offer only some of them... would be better than ours.
Outside of Simmons, Embiid, and Fultz. I think Saric is the only prospect better than OG, Siakam, Wright and Poeltl....and I'm thinking of that objectively Dan.
So if Simmons, Embiid, and Fultz are off limits, they're not offering much more than what we can offer.
Boston could blow us out of the water.
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostI agree that those teams don't want to take a big risk - but with their excess of assets, outbidding the Raptors' best prospect offers isn't actually a big risk - and allowing the Raptors to win Kawhi's services and maybe retain him long term could be just as big a risk.That is a normal collar. Move on, find a new slant.
Comment
-
saints91 wrote: View PostIt's fact that Phili receives the lesser of their two 1st round picks next year (Between their own and Sacramento's), and they have a ton of second round picks coming to them (which are valuable)
Outside of Simmons, Embiid, and Fultz. I think Saric is the only prospect better than OG, Siakam, Wright and Poeltl....and I'm thinking of that objectively Dan.
So if Simmons, Embiid, and Fultz are off limits, they're not offering much more than what we can offer.
Boston could blow us out of the water.
Comment
-
Shaolin Fantastic wrote: View PostNot unless they involve Jaylen Brown or some of their highly valuable future picks in the trade, at which point they'd be making it very hard for themselves to acquire Anthony Davis later.
Comment
-
saints91 wrote: View PostJaylen Brown is movable, they have Tatum, and they could offer their picks for the next two years as they have Sacs and Memphis's next year. They are set up really well to make this trade
Comment
-
if that's all it takes then they should pull the trigger. I would move Jaylen Brown, 2 picks and a larger contract for Kawhi. Even if Kawhi leaves they still have the assets to be as much of a contender as anyone else in the league.
Comment
-
on tsn 1050: Oddly enough Windhorst just said the Spurs are in control. Says he thinks the spurs have a good offer from the raptors, but not sure the spurs will pull the trigger (may wait for a better offer). Claims the spurs want young prospects. Says he won't name who he's heard is included in the trade bc its dangerous (but should be obvious to fans). Thinks it will be a genuine risk trade (raps won't get good look at him).Last edited by rebelrouser89; Tue Jul 17, 2018, 05:47 PM.
Comment
-
Shaolin Fantastic wrote: View PostThat's what I'm wondering, because all the reports so far seem to conflict with that idea.
It also doesn't really fit Masai's M.O. as Scraptor outlined.
I actually think it's more likely Masai just cashes in JV and almost all his prospect chips in the deal instead. Windhorst also seems to be the most connected here and said OG has to be in the deal when Lowe proposed a DeMar-centered one.
Now, San Antonio has had success with the "Twin Towers" approach with Robinson and Duncan - but that was in a different offensive era.
Comment
Comment