Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Game #17: Toronto Raptors 103 - Golden State Warriors 112

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Axel
    replied
    What's sad is that if these players cared nearly as much as we do, there'd be no question of their efforts on the glass and on defence. All the athleticism in the world but without the will to be great.

    They can talk all they want about wanting to win but until they show the will to go out and do what's necessary to be great then they are fair game for all the criticism.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcHAPPY
    replied
    p00ka wrote: View Post
    Sad man, sad, that so many raptor fans have become so jaded as to spend so much time going out of their way to downgrade the best player on their team, who is still so young and still showing that he puts in the time and effort to improve on his weaknesses, and is of such high character and commitment, and on such a reasonable contract,,,, when there's so much else to whine and bitch about. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, but I want, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, I want, I want, I want, I want, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
    That is one way to look at it.

    Another way to look at it might be that after 18 years so many Raptor fans continue to act as cattle blindly herded to the slaughter without an ounce of resistance. It is great DeRozan is an awesome young man. But he is not contributing to wins in Toronto.

    I respect your opinion p00ka but I'm want to see this team win.... waaaaa waaaa waaaaa.
    DeRozan has been a part of losing for 5 years now..... waaaaaa waaaaa waaaa.
    After 5 years, time for everyone to move on..... waaaa waaaaaa waaaaa.

    Leave a comment:


  • p00ka
    replied
    CalgaryRapsFan wrote: View Post
    Isn't the fact that the Raptors' best players (Gay & DeRozan) are so flawed (not to mention making nearly half the total salary cap between them), precisely the reason so many fans are clamoring for a legitimate rebuild? That's also why this team just isn't very good. It's not a knock against any particular player (certainly not on a personal level), but rather an admission that this BC-constructed frankenteam needs an extreme overhaul, if it wants to be considered a true contender going forward.

    As a fan, I want to root for a team that I know will be a perennial contender. I know this roster will never become that team. Therefore, I want to see the roster rebuilt so that it can become that team I can cheer for. I don't hate any players, but I do hate the dismal state of this franchise.

    DeRozan is all those things you mentioned. What he isn't - and should never have been asked to be - is a #1/#2 type player asked to carry a team on his back. The problem is that with the current roster (given the CBA), there's no way to improve the team around him (and Gay), so that he/they can slide back into the appropriate slots. Therefore, we either evaluate him/them in the position they're in, or we request the team to be rebuilt so that appropriately talented players can be assigned to each slot. Bottom line is something's gotta give.
    I needed to see more than some, but I've come to fully accept that this team is far more flawed than I hoped, as long as Gay is a part of it, but justifying incessant criticism of DeMar individually, by lumping him in with Gay as a package, is flawed. Yes, something has got to give, but this anti-DD bitching is like trying to argue with a bunch of PMSing chicks. It's so over the top that eventually the only way to quiet it down is to say "I'm wrong, you're right, I'm sorry",,,,,,,, but even then people come out of the woodwork to taunt those that support DeMar, over possibly the lowest denominator in a team collapse. It's sick, man.

    Leave a comment:


  • special1
    replied
    CalgaryRapsFan wrote: View Post
    Isn't the fact that the Raptors' best players (Gay & DeRozan) are so flawed (not to mention making nearly half the total salary cap between them), precisely the reason so many fans are clamoring for a legitimate rebuild? That's also why this team just isn't very good. It's not a knock against any particular player (certainly not on a personal level), but rather an admission that this BC-constructed frankenteam needs an extreme overhaul, if it wants to be considered a true contender going forward.

    As a fan, I want to root for a team that I know will be a perennial contender. I know this roster will never become that team. Therefore, I want to see the roster rebuilt so that it can become that team I can cheer for. I don't hate any players, but I do hate the dismal state of this franchise.

    DeRozan is all those things you mentioned. What he isn't - and should never have been asked to be - is a #1/#2 type player asked to carry a team on his back. The problem is that with the current roster (given the CBA), there's no way to improve the team around him (and Gay), so that he/they can slide back into the appropriate slots. Therefore, we either evaluate him/them in the position they're in, or we request the team to be rebuilt so that appropriately talented players can be assigned to each slot. Bottom line is something's gotta give.
    Is not JV one of our better players? Is he not also flawed? I mean, if he was more consistent, maybe they would give him the ball more. If he could get a decent post position, i'm sure he'd get more touches.

    Also, I don't understand why posters keep lumping Gay and Derozan together. Get out of here with that BS. We all know who should go between the two. Gay makes twice as much as Demar. 9.5 million is a bargain for what Demar Brings! 19 million is ridiculous for what Rudy brings. No need to lump them together.

    Truth is, I argued with you guys for months that Rudy Gay wasn't any better than Demar. Now you have him and you pretend like you weren't pleading for BC to pull the trigger....lol fans

    Leave a comment:


  • special1
    replied
    planetmars wrote: View Post
    I personally think he's peaked. Most NBA players peak at 24 especially the athletic ones. The question is whether or not he can sustain it. But history tells you that at age 24 is when most NBA players are their most productive and then it goes down hill from there.

    If he remains a Raptor I hope he proves me wrong.
    He's proven you wrong before, so my bet is he will again. Let's be honest....its not that hard to prove you wrong. Your players peaking at 24 is ridiculous . Most NBA players are coming out of school at 20-22 years old. It usually takes players a while to get it all together. The age is much closer to 27 or 28.

    edit: it wasn't the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard...
    Last edited by special1; Wed Dec 4, 2013, 05:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • octothorp
    replied
    planetmars wrote: View Post
    I personally think he's peaked. Most NBA players peak at 24 especially the athletic ones. The question is whether or not he can sustain it. But history tells you that at age 24 is when most NBA players are their most productive and then it goes down hill from there.

    If he remains a Raptor I hope he proves me wrong.
    While I don't disagree with this, I think guys typically continue to get smarter through their career for a number of years after their physical and statistical peak. My optimistic view of DeRozan is that yeah, he's probably near the peak of his physical game and his statistical production too, but can he continue to improve in the relatively unmeasurable ways that contribute to winning? History also tells us that championship teams don't aren't loaded with athletic 24-year-olds. I'd happily the numbers DeRozan is currently putting up, wrapped in a more cerebral overall game. Heck, I'd give him a raise if that's what he brought to the table.

    Leave a comment:


  • CalgaryRapsFan
    replied
    p00ka wrote: View Post
    Sad man, sad, that so many raptor fans have become so jaded as to spend so much time going out of their way to downgrade the best player on their team, who is still so young and still showing that he puts in the time and effort to improve on his weaknesses, and is of such high character and commitment, and on such a reasonable contract,,,, when there's so much else to whine and bitch about. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, but I want, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, I want, I want, I want, I want, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
    Isn't the fact that the Raptors' best players (Gay & DeRozan) are so flawed (not to mention making nearly half the total salary cap between them), precisely the reason so many fans are clamoring for a legitimate rebuild? That's also why this team just isn't very good. It's not a knock against any particular player (certainly not on a personal level), but rather an admission that this BC-constructed frankenteam needs an extreme overhaul, if it wants to be considered a true contender going forward.

    As a fan, I want to root for a team that I know will be a perennial contender. I know this roster will never become that team. Therefore, I want to see the roster rebuilt so that it can become that team I can cheer for. I don't hate any players, but I do hate the dismal state of this franchise.

    DeRozan is all those things you mentioned. What he isn't - and should never have been asked to be - is a #1/#2 type player asked to carry a team on his back. The problem is that with the current roster (given the CBA), there's no way to improve the team around him (and Gay), so that he/they can slide back into the appropriate slots. Therefore, we either evaluate him/them in the position they're in, or we request the team to be rebuilt so that appropriately talented players can be assigned to each slot. Bottom line is something's gotta give.

    Leave a comment:


  • p00ka
    replied
    slaw wrote: View Post
    Depends what you mean by "production". If I take 20 shots to get 20 points am I as productive as a player who takes 12 shots to get 20 points? The process is very different and process is certainly part of measuring productivity, isn't it?

    Looking at PPG, AstPG or RPG tells us something about a player, definitely but those numbers don't tell us much about efficiency, productivity or value. You have to look beyond the box score. I think it's called context or something....
    Does context encompass different roles, within different systems, on different teams, with different mix of players/talent? Where can I find that in the bean counting context?

    Leave a comment:


  • KeonClark
    replied
    planetmars wrote: View Post
    I personally think he's peaked. Most NBA players peak at 24 especially the athletic ones. The question is whether or not he can sustain it. But history tells you that at age 24 is when most NBA players are their most productive and then it goes down hill from there.

    If he remains a Raptor I hope he proves me wrong.
    Right and wrong. Derozan has likely peaked, although his ball handling is much stronger this year. He is averaging a 3 pt spike on his last 3 year average, which is a direct result of his new ability to hit a 3 pointer per game.

    However, history actually tells us players true "complete game" peak at 26-29, where they actually are at their best when it comes to contributing to winning basketball. Bird, Jordan and James are all a testament to this. Obscure examples, I know.

    Leave a comment:


  • JimiCliff
    replied
    enlightenment wrote: View Post


    At least this happened.
    He even stared him down for a second afterwards!

    I watched the start of the first quarter; JV scores 6 points quickly and easily. Then I went to bed.

    I wake up, look at the box: JV has 8 points total.

    Shaking my damn head.

    Leave a comment:


  • slaw
    replied
    special1 wrote: View Post
    Your production is your production. Per game is only a shady statistic when it doesn't fit your narrative huh?
    Depends what you mean by "production". If I take 20 shots to get 20 points am I as productive as a player who takes 12 shots to get 20 points? The process is very different and process is certainly part of measuring productivity, isn't it?

    Looking at PPG, AstPG or RPG tells us something about a player, definitely but those numbers don't tell us much about efficiency, productivity or value. You have to look beyond the box score. I think it's called context or something....

    Leave a comment:


  • p00ka
    replied
    Sad man, sad, that so many raptor fans have become so jaded as to spend so much time going out of their way to downgrade the best player on their team, who is still so young and still showing that he puts in the time and effort to improve on his weaknesses, and is of such high character and commitment, and on such a reasonable contract,,,, when there's so much else to whine and bitch about. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, but I want, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, I want, I want, I want, I want, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    Leave a comment:


  • planetmars
    replied
    special1 wrote: View Post
    Consistency? You can say that about every single NBA player not named Lebron/Durant/Paul.....

    No one is saying that the 24 year old is in his prime or is even a finished product! He HAS been a lot more consistent this year than past years. However, not enough to persuade you guys from saying the same stuff from past years.

    I'm just waiting for you to turn on JV. How, at JV's size and ability is he 18th in rebounding at 7.6 rpg for centers? Isn't that below average (30 starting centers)?

    Drummond is 2nd in the league in rebounding at 12.5 rpg for centers. Same years in the league.....No excuses. Don't you think its time you focused your attention on someone else? *patiently waiting*
    I personally think he's peaked. Most NBA players peak at 24 especially the athletic ones. The question is whether or not he can sustain it. But history tells you that at age 24 is when most NBA players are their most productive and then it goes down hill from there.

    If he remains a Raptor I hope he proves me wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • Axel
    replied
    special1 wrote: View Post
    http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/pl...hooting-guards

    Demar is 11th in rebounds per game for shooting guards. Out of 47 players he's 11th best in rebounds per game. That is a fact. No per 36 numbers just fact.
    Now I know why your stats are BS, you're using the ESPN filter of "qualified", which is removing players like D Wade, Jimmy Butler, JR Smith, James Harden, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • enlightenment
    replied


    At least this happened.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X