KazanTheMan wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TANK vs ANTI TANK - SUPER THREAD - The Because I Can't Keep Track Edition
Collapse
X
-
Who do you think is more frustrated right now?
1. Kevin Garnett, who was traded to a (relatively) big market team, where ownership has spent a gazillion dollars, and expectations are through the roof, and the home crowd is chanting "Garnett sucks!"
OR
2. Rudy Gay?
In any given year, there are going to be good teams and bad teams regardless of management's intentions. My advice to the players: suck it up and play.
Comment
-
ball4life wrote: View PostTheres only 2 direction from noman's land one can go....
1, chase the victory flag
2, run towards the tank in hopes of landing as a winner
the victory flag is about 50,000 miles away for the Raps whereas the tank on the other hand...... hmmm
Comment
-
peanutwoozle wrote: View Postthe tank on the other hand may be a little closer, but there are a lot of barriers in between that might let us through, or might not.
1. Losing with current roster and no cap flexibility.
2. Losing with young (to be drafted) roster and tons of flexibility.
Neither are guarantees of future success. But to the pro-tanking crowd, only #2 has an even remote possibility of future success.Last edited by Nilanka; Fri Dec 6, 2013, 10:52 AM.
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostWho do you think is more frustrated right now?
1. Kevin Garnett, who was traded to a (relatively) big market team, where ownership has spent a gazillion dollars, and expectations are through the roof, and the home crowd is chanting "Garnett sucks!"
OR
2. Rudy Gay?
In any given year, there are going to be good teams and bad teams regardless of management's intentions. My advice to the players: suck it up and play.
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostI realize both arguments are a little more complicated than what I described below, but it really comes down to:
1. Losing with current roster and no cap flexibility.
2. Losing with young (to be drafted) roster and tons of flexibility.
Neither are guarantees of future success. But to the pro-tanking crowd, only #1 has an even remote possibility of future success.
Comment
-
-
peanutwoozle wrote: View Posta remote possibility of future success, ok, but a high possibility of future failure, not looking too good to me.
Staying the course most definitely does not.
Comment
-
-
peanutwoozle wrote: View Postdon't count on that core to stay then.
our Bad Rapport with players is just going to get worse.
You're not really this naive.
Comment
Comment