Scraptor wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
#kl/dd/jj/pp/jv
Collapse
X
-
More support for the People's Lineup (maybe a mod could retitle the thread, I had a hell of a time finding it lol)
Take a look at how @Raptors frontcourts pair up with guards/wings... should Patman start with JJ? #RTZ #WeTheNorth pic.twitter.com/ulD1BoyWzX
— Joe Vicious (@joeviciousnba) February 27, 2015
Leave a comment:
-
Well, still don't have the dream lineup but I'll definitely take JJ > Ross or (shudder) Vasquez.
Leave a comment:
-
iblastoff wrote: View Posti remember watching part of the game and even with JV on the floor, we were losing a lot of defensive rebounds.
JV dominated the defensive boards last night
Leave a comment:
-
planetmars wrote: View PostI'm more impressed that JJ was there in the crucial moments of the 4th instead of GV or Lou. I don't personally care who starts. It's always about who finishes.
And despite the use of this line up.. JV still wasn't there in the dying moments. Could have used him to grab some boards. How many opportunities did the Spurs get? Could have easily been a loss.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm more impressed that JJ was there in the crucial moments of the 4th instead of GV or Lou. I don't personally care who starts. It's always about who finishes.
And despite the use of this line up.. JV still wasn't there in the dying moments. Could have used him to grab some boards. How many opportunities did the Spurs get? Could have easily been a loss.
Leave a comment:
-
As long as JJ is in the starting lineup and Vasquez and Ross are not i'm good.
Leave a comment:
-
nubreed000 wrote: View Postyup!
I'd like to see these guys play more. Last night they worked well but there were some stupid careless turnovers courtesy of Lowry and Demar. I think if they played more and ironed out a few things this line up could be lethal.
Honestly that rumoured trade about green, plumlee & Ennis would be perfect ; atleast as a filler while we work Bruno and Bebe into backups.
Leave a comment:
-
big boi wrote: View PostWe prob would have waited a while longer to see any meaningful minutes for this lineup if Amir hadn't picked up a couple o quick fouls a few minutes in.
I'd like to see these guys play more. Last night they worked well but there were some stupid careless turnovers courtesy of Lowry and Demar. I think if they played more and ironed out a few things this line up could be lethal.
Leave a comment:
-
CalgaryRapsFan wrote: View PostThe lineup looked good, as did the 2nd unit with Amir... chalk up another decent idea from us posters.
Even if Amir starts, I like him being subbed-out early for Patterson, to give some continuity while avoiding the straight 5-for-5 hockey line change. Ross winds up being the 4th/5th sub brought on, allowing him to remain on the floor as the starters come back on, ensuring there is always at least one floor-spacer on the court, after setting the tone defensively for the first 4-5 minutes.
Leave a comment:
-
The lineup looked good, as did the 2nd unit with Amir... chalk up another decent idea from us posters.
Even if Amir starts, I like him being subbed-out early for Patterson, to give some continuity while avoiding the straight 5-for-5 hockey line change. Ross winds up being the 4th/5th sub brought on, allowing him to remain on the floor as the starters come back on, ensuring there is always at least one floor-spacer on the court, after setting the tone defensively for the first 4-5 minutes.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: