Jclaw wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game #68 - Boston Celtics 91 - Toronto Raptors 105
Collapse
X
-
Nice game! That first Q was fun, with vintage Scola popping up out of nowhere. Then the first half of the second Q, I really liked the three bigs, Thompson, PP and BeBe, who saw time and we're all very active. We won't talk about the end of the 2nd Q.
We got the usually Scola in the 3rd, so the game got more interesting.
And then that Thompson/PP frontline was in there while the team blew it open again. Helped that Lowry decided it was time to win.
Nice win overall. Lots of good contributions across the board.
Comment
-
-
Barolt wrote: View PostFor sure, but while we're in the regular season let's pay attention to how we win, because wins and losses aren't the best indicator of playoff success, how you win is sometimes a better indicator than whether you win.
Comment
-
Day One wrote: View Postno, no man, not at all. the words you put together here are inaccurate, I get it that it may be your opinion but i feel the need to let you know that its wrong. like ingnorently wrong, almost to the point that one could argue thats its intentionally purposefully insinuateingly wrong. yeah thats right i made up a word.
But if you don't think he's right it would be better if you showed some evidence rather than throw accusations. Would certainly go further in convincing me.
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostWell, I mean, he's right though. For example, point differential is more predictive of future wins than win percentage is.
But if you don't think he's right it would be better if you showed some evidence rather than throw accusations. Would certainly go further in convincing me.
Comment
-
Day One wrote: View Post"how you win is sometime a better indicator then whether you win" this implys that good loss can be better then a bad win, and I find that ridiculous. but yes i am sure some stats can prove otherwise as always.
didn't you watch what happened to this team just last year?
Comment
-
-
DanH wrote: View PostWell, I mean, he's right though. For example, point differential is more predictive of future wins than win percentage is.
But if you don't think he's right it would be better if you showed some evidence rather than throw accusations. Would certainly go further in convincing me.I relish negativity and disappointment. It is not healthy. Somebody buy me a pony.
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View Post5th in point differential. 4th in win percentage.I relish negativity and disappointment. It is not healthy. Somebody buy me a pony.
Comment
-
Day One wrote: View Postno, no man, not at all. the words you put together here are inaccurate, I get it that it may be your opinion but i feel the need to let you know that its wrong. like ingnorently wrong, almost to the point that one could argue thats its intentionally purposefully insinuateingly wrong. yeah thats right i made up a word.
Comment
Comment