Multipaul wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Raps 2010-2011 Starting C and PF
Collapse
X
-
If playing the PF makes Bargnani play closer to the rim, then I'm all for it, but I don't think it matters. If he wasn't able to use his quickness against the C's in this league over the last three years, then he sure as hell won't do it against the PFs.
Re: Rebounding
He can't box out his own shadow, maybe his height advantage will yield him more rebounds (since PFs are usually shorter), but since he doesn't jump and other PFs do, even that's questionable.
Comment
-
ruined is a harsh word though
so what if bargs' reb numbers are better than cb's this year? can we come back to this thread and swith the word ruined with 'enhanced'?
davis will be an all star soon enuff, so all the cb fanboys wont need to sh** the bed anymore. dude has skillz.
Comment
-
Multipaul wrote: View Postruined is a harsh word though
so what if bargs' reb numbers are better than cb's this year? can we come back to this thread and swith the word ruined with 'enhanced'?
davis will be an all star soon enuff, so all the cb fanboys wont need to sh** the bed anymore. dude has skillz.
Comment
-
Multipaul wrote: View PostThe point of what I was saying is that Amir and Davis will probably REB better than him.
Davis and Johnson will both be better rebounders than CB4, so will Bargs.
And since offensive rebounding is generally only a small percentage of a player's rebounding total, where he plays on offense doesn't matter. Loads of perimeter big men don't have trouble grabbing boards. Only Bargnani.Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
Comment
-
Brasky wrote: View PostBargs is best when guarding the opposing team's larger power based interior player who tries to isolate and back him down. Conversely, many PFs are just too quick and athletic for him to handle. I think that has been the consensus for quite some time.
Amir, on the other hand, is best when guarding quick PFs.
Bargs is going to suck at rebounding regardless of whether he's at PF or C. His lack of defensive awareness and understanding of team & weakside defense, while perhaps a bigger issue at C, will still remain a problem at PF. He's also going to struggle with transition defense no matter what 'position' he's playing.
On offense, you want to force the other team's C into a matchup with Bargnani, since he is usually no match for Bargnani's shooting range and first step.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, there is absolutely no difference between the 4 and the 4 and 5 on the offensive end and what people need to start saying is not, "move Bargs to the four" and instead say, 'move Bargs into the high post". I'm pretty sure that is what most people mean when they talk about Bargs as a power forward."Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival."
-Churchill
Comment
Comment