planetmars wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BC: "We will be in a unique position with $12 million in cap space before the draft"
Collapse
X
-
I am not ashamed to admit I didn't watch a single Bucks game this year. So does anyone know if Ilyasova can play the 3? If so, he might be a good target. Plus he is 24 years old. That puts him in line with the rest of our mediocre core.
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostInteresting suggestion in Reddick. He's only got 1 year left on his deal. Wonder if Orlando would be willing to deal. He certainly fits the "shooter" requirement that Casey talked about.
id look at ray allen in the offseason if hed be willing to come here for less then 5mill.Last edited by DoNDaDDa; Thu May 3, 2012, 01:03 PM.
Comment
-
Gorlitzer wrote: View PostI am not ashamed to admit I didn't watch a single Bucks game this year. So does anyone know if Ilyasova can play the 3? If so, he might be a good target. Plus he is 24 years old. That puts him in line with the rest of our mediocre core.
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostI'm not sure if I'd be willing to trade our pick without getting another 1st rounder back, even if it's outside the lottery.
Comment
-
I would say that Danny Granger probably makes the most sense out of all the options, especially if the Pacers feel that Paul George is a forward and only a forward. Financially, they're in great shape for the long-term, so re-signing Hibbert/George/Collison won't be an issue anyway, but... if they want to acquire a big name SG to pair with George (Eric Gordon, Kevin Martin, etc.), then moving Granger might enter into their minds.
Ed Davis, James Johnson, 2012 pick might be enough... I don't think we would sacrifice DD in this scenario.
As for the others...- Josh Smith is probably the 2nd most likely option, although he doesn't really satisfy the 3-point shooting criterion that BC/DC are looking for from the 3 spot.
- Rudy Gay is wayyy too valuable for the Grizz IMO.
- Ditto for Deng.
- Ditto for Parker.
- Iguodala might work, but I just don't see much incentive for the Sixers. (And like Smith, shooting is not his strong suit.)
After that, I don't think anyone else in their salary bracket is really worth trading for.
Comment
-
-
c_bcm wrote: View PostI would have to go through a thorough list of NBA salaries to know who is reasonable to go after. But from your list the only one I'd be interested in is Rudy Gay. I highly doubt he is gettable.
I would consider going after Ilyasova, but that wouldn't require a trade. Signing Ersan would also allow us to maintain some level of financial flexibility, which can never be a bad thing for this rebuilding process.
Comment
-
Bouncepass wrote: View Postditto. I don't see great value in most of these with a player and a lottery pick. Even though the Raptors are likely drafting at #8, they might well be able to get a player that has significant upside, and will be inexpensive for a while. Interesting that Casey is looking for shooters. In the draft, Beal, Barnes, Lamb and maybe Rivers would provide a deep threat (maybe Lillard too?)
Barnes 36%
Beal 34%
Lamb 34%
Rivers 36%
Comment
-
jrdyck wrote: View PostI would say that Danny Granger probably makes the most sense out of all the options, especially if the Pacers feel that Paul George is a forward and only a forward. Financially, they're in great shape for the long-term, so re-signing Hibbert/George/Collison won't be an issue anyway, but... if they want to acquire a big name SG to pair with George (Eric Gordon, Kevin Martin, etc.), then moving Granger might enter into their minds.
Ed Davis, James Johnson, 2012 pick might be enough... I don't think we would sacrifice DD in this scenario.
As for the others...- Josh Smith is probably the 2nd most likely option, although he doesn't really satisfy the 3-point shooting criterion that BC/DC are looking for from the 3 spot.
- Rudy Gay is wayyy too valuable for the Grizz IMO.
- Ditto for Deng.
- Ditto for Parker.
- Iguodala might work, but I just don't see much incentive for the Sixers. (And like Smith, shooting is not his strong suit.)
After that, I don't think anyone else in their salary bracket is really worth trading for.
If a sign and trade happens with Gordon going to Indiana, I think Danny Granger is the money piece being sent in return.
Comment
-
If our biggest potential move this summer is to trade for Reddick I'll be very disappointed. As BC said, we'll be in a unique position so let's get everything what's possible, not only one shooter from the bench. I'm not against Reddick, but I hope to see more action from Raptors management(Sorry for poor English )
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostInteresting suggestion in Reddick. He's only got 1 year left on his deal. Wonder if Orlando would be willing to deal. He certainly fits the "shooter" requirement that Casey talked about.
I like the Josh Smith idea but no Smith trade ever seems to work cause of his salary and the value he has to Atlanta. I don't see how that works without moving Bargnani and I can't see Atlanta necessarily even wanting Bargs. Granger also seems possible but really tough to say what the Pacers would want back. Again, short of Bargnani, don't know what the Raps could offer that would interest Indiana and beat other potential offers.
Comment
Comment