Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ESPN rankings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vykis
    replied
    tucas wrote: View Post
    +1 he's a top 5 defending pg in the league. Throw in distributor and scorer he's definitely a top 50 player
    Dont agree about his scoring ability, but i might have overreacted about his placing in the rankings, i still think he should be a bit lower, but it seems fair

    Leave a comment:


  • Ajar
    replied
    I moved to Minneapolis last year, and got to see Wolves-Mavs before Rubio's injury. He was pretty crazy to watch. Of course, so was Dirk.

    (And yes, even though I don't personally hate Vince, I booed him on behalf of Raptor fans.)

    The Raptors play the Wolves here next April, so I'm definitely going to go to that game. Being able to walk to the venue is pretty nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • tucas
    replied
    Soft Euro wrote: View Post
    Don't know about you, but I think defending is a skill too.
    +1 he's a top 5 defending pg in the league. Throw in distributor and scorer he's definitely a top 50 player

    Leave a comment:


  • Soft Euro
    replied
    Vykis wrote: View Post
    He's a great distributor/floor general and thats what a young team needs, but does that alone make a player top 50 worthy, maybe they're looking into the upcoming season. All his other skills (except for stealing) are average
    Don't know about you, but I think defending is a skill too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vykis
    replied
    He's a great distributor/floor general and thats what a young team needs, but does that alone make a player top 50 worthy, maybe they're looking into the upcoming season. All his other skills (except for stealing) are average

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugmenot
    replied
    Vykis wrote: View Post
    Ricky"35%FG"Rubio@47 that's just some ignorant bitch shit...
    Considering the Timberwolves were 18-13 with Rubio starting, 3-7 with him on the bench, and 5-20 with no Rubio, ESPN may have underrated Rubio.

    I believe he has a good chance to become a franchise player.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vykis
    replied
    Ricky"35%FG"Rubio@47 that's just some ignorant bitch shit...

    Leave a comment:


  • pillowmint
    replied
    OnTheRightTrack wrote: View Post
    ESPN thinks that Ryan Anderson is better than every player on the Raptors......WTF are they smoking?
    +100

    It's getting out of hand there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nilanka
    replied
    OnTheRightTrack wrote: View Post
    ESPN thinks that Ryan Anderson is better than every player on the Raptors......WTF are they smoking?
    I can't wait for someone to nab Anderson early in my fantasy league. Life without Dwight is going to be tough...

    Leave a comment:


  • OnTheRightTrack
    replied
    ESPN thinks that Ryan Anderson is better than every player on the Raptors......WTF are they smoking?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nilanka
    replied
    AlienOverlord wrote: View Post
    They're are meaningless in terms of what our team needs to do this year, but they are somewhat meaningful as a tool to measure the value of our players. At the least it tells us how others view our players talent level and therefore what they are worth in a trade. Of course, this list compiled by all the GMs would be much more meaningful.
    That's just it. These rankings reflect what a bunch of ESPN bloggers think, not necessarily what GMs think. I personally don't think they're accurate measures of anything.

    But that's just me. The only "rankings" that I pay attention to are the standings.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joey
    replied
    This thread is from Last year, but its worth reading how far some have come/regressed in just one year.

    Leave a comment:


  • pillowmint
    replied
    Nilanka wrote: View Post
    +1

    These rankings are meaningless.
    I enjoy the rankings, stupid but fun. I don't have any clue how Galinari ranked higher than Bargnani...thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • AlienOverlord
    replied
    Nilanka wrote: View Post
    +1

    These rankings are meaningless.
    They're are meaningless in terms of what our team needs to do this year, but they are somewhat meaningful as a tool to measure the value of our players. At the least it tells us how others view our players talent level and therefore what they are worth in a trade. Of course, this list compiled by all the GMs would be much more meaningful.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nilanka
    replied
    Mack North wrote: View Post
    None of these rankings mean jack squat, I'm a little surprised people take them so seriously.
    +1

    These rankings are meaningless.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X