DanH wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything Bismack Biyombo
Collapse
X
-
DanH wrote: View PostWhy's that?
With a cap of 100M+, and a contender typically paying close to the tax (~120M+), that means 24M per position. C's are more expensive. If you assume 16M for JV and 11M for BB that's 27M, plus whatever rookie scale/min contract is sitting in the third string. Not bad at all, actually.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostThan you have to include 50 mill for our starting backcourt. Also a high salaried starting PF upgrade.
PG: 20M, 7M (27M)
SG: 25M, 10M (35M)
SF: 14M (14M)
PF: 20M, 6M (26M)
C: 16M, 11M (27M)
That makes 129M, plus minimum/rookie scale deals to fill out the rest of our depth (6 spots x ~2M means 12M) - 141M. That's WITH a big upgrade at PF AND a big deal for Lowry AND a max deal for DD AND a big deal for Biyombo.
Average tax level is about 125M over the next few years. So it's like having a 96M team salary this year, in terms of salary relative to the tax.
Golden State is at 96M. CLE at 107M. LAC at 96M. Thunder at 94M. Spurs are 87M. Seems like if you want to be a contender, that's just the price you pay.
Comment
-
Plus that ignores that we probably lose PP and Ross (~16M) in any deal to bring in a 20M+ PF, so we probably end up with a few more minimum/MLE level deals instead, bringing the total even lower.
Comment
-
-
1. I think it's really wishful thinking that Masai will get BB to sign for a 2-yr MLE. The dude is probably going to command at minimum 3yrs-$30mm+ and probably more than that in guaranteed money.
2. If Masai wants to keep BB that badly I think there's a good chance we move JV if we can extract good value.
3. If Masai wants to keep both guys at the prices they'll likely be paid I once again have no idea what the long-term strategy is here.
Comment
-
This seems just like Tristan Thompson/Kevin Love scenario. Look how well that's workout. I can also see Biz having a huge rebounding streak in the playoffs just like TT did. Which forced Cleveland's hand to pay him.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostAssuming a big name PF and a raise for Lowry:
PG: 20M, 7M (27M)
SG: 25M, 10M (35M)
SF: 14M (14M)
PF: 20M, 6M (26M)
C: 16M, 11M (27M)
That makes 129M, plus minimum/rookie scale deals to fill out the rest of our depth (6 spots x ~2M means 12M) - 141M. That's WITH a big upgrade at PF AND a big deal for Lowry AND a max deal for DD AND a big deal for Biyombo.
Average tax level is about 125M over the next few years. So it's like having a 96M team salary this year, in terms of salary relative to the tax.
Golden State is at 96M. CLE at 107M. LAC at 96M. Thunder at 94M. Spurs are 87M. Seems like if you want to be a contender, that's just the price you pay.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Only situation I can see where it would make sense to trade JV is if you're pilfering a superstar from someone. Maybe something like JV+Ross+Clips 1st to the Kings for Cousins I'd be ok with. That would leave you enough room under the cap to re-sign Biyombo easily, start him at the 5, Cousins at the 4 and Bebe as backup center.
In that case Biyombo might actually work as a long-term starting 5 since you'd be getting so much offense from Lowry-DD-Cousins that you wouldn't really need your center to score.
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostYou really think Lowry will take less than DD? I think they both end up with 25 a piece.
Comment
-
Scraptor wrote: View Post1. I think it's really wishful thinking that Masai will get BB to sign for a 2-yr MLE. The dude is probably going to command at minimum 3yrs-$30mm+ and probably more than that in guaranteed money.
2. If Masai wants to keep BB that badly I think there's a good chance we move JV if we can extract good value.
3. If Masai wants to keep both guys at the prices they'll likely be paid I once again have no idea what the long-term strategy is here.
Regarding point 1---I think you're probably right however if biz accepts the mle and opts out a year later we can then offer him 10-11 per year with his early bird rights. So he'd be missing out on 4.5 million next year in exchange for staying in a good situation. Now obviously the guaranteed money is a huge factor but hopefully we can make it happen.
It's wishful thinking but you never know. He saw first hand in Charlotte what happens when you're not put in a good situation.
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View PostOnly situation I can see where it would make sense to trade JV is if you're pilfering a superstar from someone. Maybe something like JV+Ross+Clips 1st to the Kings for Cousins I'd be ok with. That would leave you enough room under the cap to re-sign Biyombo easily, start him at the 5, Cousins at the 4 and Bebe as backup center.
In that case Biyombo might actually work as a long-term starting 5 since you'd be getting so much offense from Lowry-DD-Cousins that you wouldn't really need your center to score.@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View PostOnly situation I can see where it would make sense to trade JV is if you're pilfering a superstar from someone. Maybe something like JV+Ross+Clips 1st to the Kings for Cousins I'd be ok with. That would leave you enough room under the cap to re-sign Biyombo easily, start him at the 5, Cousins at the 4 and Bebe as backup center.
In that case Biyombo might actually work as a long-term starting 5 since you'd be getting so much offense from Lowry-DD-Cousins that you wouldn't really need your center to score."Stop eating your sushi."
"I do actually have a pair of Uggs."
"I've had three cups of green tea tonight. I'm wired. I'm absolutely wired."
- Jack Armstrong
Comment
-
JimiCliff wrote: View PostMan it would be fascinating to see how the Cousins/Casey relationship would play out. I have absolutely no idea.
What I'm worried about if we get Cousins, is whether or not Casey would be able to use him correctly. You can tell me all you like about how he's a superstar, I'll just point to Kevin Love - who still isn't being used correctly though he has the potential for ridiculously high game impact.
And I'm not sure Casey's as good an X and O's guy as either Lue or Blatt.
Comment
Comment