Barolt wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything Derozan
Collapse
X
-
Gambino wrote: View PostHow can you use TMac as a barometer when he started having major injury problems in 2007 that basically ruined the rest of his career? And Vince was still a highly productive player as a starter until he was like 33.
Comment
-
Gambino wrote: View PostHow can you use TMac as a barometer when he started having major injury problems in 2007 that basically ruined the rest of his career? And Vince was still a highly productive player as a starter until he was like 33.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
And before someone brings it up, I really don't buy DeMar's 3pt improvement this season. Hot Jan+Feb, rest of year 23/93(24.7%). 4/26 in playoffs.
So he had two good months, but was awful before and after those months.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Mess wrote: View PostYou can make it your #1 priority to lose weight but not be willing to starve yourself to do it.
You need to track your marcos, higher your protein intake, lower your carbs.
You can EASILY lose weight while eating 2250 plus calories.
So in other words, Demar DeChosen is coming backAbbas wrote:
First of all i was my own source
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostIt's really hard to find any comparables for DeMar, because high usage guards who don't shoot the 3 tend to either peak WAY higher than DeMar(McGrady, Kobe, Jordan), or way lower. Spent some time looking for historical comparables, and found it's really difficult. Big one is, there just aren't any post-30 seasons of >25% usage, <35% 3FG that were good, that don't belong to Hall of Fame guys.
If we give DeRozan a 5 year deal we're paying for age 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31. Most likely DeRozan's play could drop off in the last 1 or 2 years of that deal, at which point it doesn't really matter since he'd be expiring.
Comment
-
Everything Demar Derozan
Atothe wrote: View PostWasn't trying to come off bitter but your man-love victory for DeMar is premature. I got a question for you. If DeMar is offered 20 million a year to stay here but he has to be give up 5-8 shots per game and shoot more threes or go to L.A for the same price to do whatever he wants. Which do you think he chooses?
I do think he should take more 3s.
But to answer your question I think Demar chooses to stay here because Demar wants to win. I don't think he wants to be apart of another rebuild, especially after tasting the East Finals.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkLast edited by special1; Mon May 30, 2016, 03:22 PM.
Comment
-
Billy103 wrote: View PostWhat are the chances Derozan becomes a legitimate 3 point shooter?
Can he shoot 1-2 3s a game at 30-35%? Sure.
Will he ever be a 3-4+ 3s per game, 40+% guy? Not a chance.
Indicators are awful for him ever becoming truly good. His midrange game sucks, and doesn't show a lot of signs of improvement.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Demar should do all he can do take as many pages out of the Paul Pierce book.. I think he has a really good chance of becoming a Paul Pierce type of guy if he can be threat from the 3 point line and learn to flop a little bit on the defensive side.
Comment
-
ball4life wrote: View PostDemar should do all he can do take as many pages out of the Paul Pierce book.. I think he has a really good chance of becoming a Paul Pierce type of guy if he can be threat from the 3 point line and learn to flop a little bit on the defensive side.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...3=&p4=&p5=&p6=
What DeMar does better: Turns it over less. Takes more shots. Better FT percentage(85% vs. 82.2%). Slightly better assist rate.(20.8% vs. 20.3%)
What Pierce does better: Shots(from floor and 3), rebounds, steals, blocks, lower usage, better DBPM and DWS, better at drawing fouls.
Pierce in playoffs: +29 net rating, 65.1% true shooting, .301 WS/48.
DeMar in playoffs: Not going to bother.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostDeMar's 7th season vs. Pierce's 7th season:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...3=&p4=&p5=&p6=
What DeMar does better: Turns it over less. Takes more shots. Better FT percentage(85% vs. 82.2%). Slightly better assist rate.(20.8% vs. 20.3%)
What Pierce does better: Shots(from floor and 3), rebounds, steals, blocks, lower usage, better DBPM and DWS, better at drawing fouls.
Pierce in playoffs: +29 net rating, 65.1% true shooting, .301 WS/48.
DeMar in playoffs: Not going to bother.
Comment
-
ball4life wrote: View PostDemar should do all he can do take as many pages out of the Paul Pierce book.. I think he has a really good chance of becoming a Paul Pierce type of guy if he can be threat from the 3 point line and learn to flop a little bit on the defensive side.I'm back. I no longer worship joe johnson
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostDeMar's 7th season vs. Pierce's 7th season:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...3=&p4=&p5=&p6=
What DeMar does better: Turns it over less. Takes more shots. Better FT percentage(85% vs. 82.2%). Slightly better assist rate.(20.8% vs. 20.3%)
What Pierce does better: Shots(from floor and 3), rebounds, steals, blocks, lower usage, better DBPM and DWS, better at drawing fouls.
Pierce in playoffs: +29 net rating, 65.1% true shooting, .301 WS/48.
DeMar in playoffs: Not going to bother.
I said he has a chance to mold his game to a Paul Pierce type and he should, I didnt say he is Paul Pierce.
Comment
Comment